Cited by 31Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

A New Taxonomy for Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Interventions: Results of an Umbrella Review

Open access
Greenwood, Deborah A., Litchman, Michelle L., Isaacs, Diana, Blanchette, Julia E., Dickinson, Jane K., Hughes, Allyson, Colicchio, Vanessa D., Ye, Jiancheng +3 more·2022·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background: A 2017 umbrella review defined the technology-enabled self-management (TES) feedback loop associated with a significant reduction in A1C. The purpose of this 2021 review was to develop a taxonomy of intervention attributes in technology-enabled interventions; review recent, high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses to determine if the TES framework was described and if elements contribute to improved diabetes outcomes; and to identify gaps in the literature. Methods: We identified key technology attributes needed to describe the active ingredients of TES interventions. We searched multiple databases for English language reviews published between April 2017 and April 2020, focused on PwD (population) receiving diabetes care and education (intervention) using technology-enabled self-management (comparator) in a randomized controlled trial, that impact glycemic, behavioral/psychosocial, and other diabetes self-management outcomes. AMSTAR-2 guidelines were used to assess 50 studies for methodological quality including risk of bias. Results: The TES Taxonomy was developed to standardize the description of technology-enabled interventions; and ensure research uses the taxonomy for replication and evaluation. Of the 26 included reviews, most evaluated smartphones, mobile applications, texting, internet, and telehealth. Twenty-one meta-analyses with the TES feedback loop significantly lowered A1C. Conclusions: Technology-enabled diabetes self-management interventions continue to be associated with improved clinical outcomes. The ongoing rapid adoption and engagement of technology makes it important to focus on uniform measures for behavioral/psychosocial outcomes to highlight healthy coping. Using the TES Taxonomy as a standard approach to describe technology-enabled interventions will support understanding of the impact technology has on diabetes outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19322968211036430

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An umbrella review of technology-enabled diabetes self-management proposed a new taxonomy for digital interventions, including a distinction between synchronous and asynchronous feedback modes, but noted poor reporting on this issue in the reviewed studies.

    “In an umbrella review of technology-enabled diabetes self-management [50], a new taxonomy for digital interventions was proposed. This taxonomy includes a distinction between synchronous and asynchronous feedback modes, but the authors noted poor reporting on this issue in the reviewed studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenwood, D. A., Litchman, M. L., Isaacs, D., Blanchette, J. E., Dickinson, J. K., Hughes, A., Colicchio, V. D., Ye, J., Yehl, K., Todd, A., & Peeples, M. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • T1D Exchange (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, Chicago, IL, USA
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Welldoc, Columbia, MD, USA
Corresponding author
Greenwood, Deborah A.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2021-08-11
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
812-824
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3193087508
Cited by
31
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Association of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists (None)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes self-management interventions, glycemic control, HbA1c reduction, mobile health, telemedicine, text messaging, psychosocial outcomes, behavioral effects
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Technology, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review