The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning
Abstract
Task-based methodology is particularly suited to teaching languages for specific purposes, because of its affinity to behavioural objectives. Doubts have been expressed as to whether learners actually learn language through doing tasks, and if they do, exactly what they learn. This paper reports the preliminary results of an ongoing study of the benefits of building repetition into a communicative task in an English for Specific Purposes course. We compare the performances of two learners at markedly different levels of English proficiency and find that both benefited from the opportunity to recycle communicative content as they repeated complex tasks. This suggests that task repetition of the type reported here may be a useful pedagogic procedure and that the same task can help different learners develop different areas of their interlanguage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Across previous empirical studies, the intervals between same-task repetitions vary considerably, such as massed (immediate) repetition (e.g., Lambert et al., 2017;Lynch & Maclean, 2000), across a few days (e.g., Ahmadian & Tavakoli, 2011;Gass et al., 1999;Kim & Tracy-Ventura, 2013), weeks (e.g., Fukuta, 2016), or months (e.g., Bygate, 2001).”
From MASSED TASK REPETITION IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT: AN EFL CLASSROOM STUDY (2022) · cites this paper as Lynch & Maclean, 2000
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning
Garcia, P., & Skehan, P. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587891 · Cited by 3,489
A Framework for Task-Based Learning
Yuan, F., & Willis, J. R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588204 · Cited by 1,970
A Framework for the Implementation of Task-based Instruction
SKEHAN, P. (1996) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/17.1.38 · Cited by 1,547
(2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,333
The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100015047 · Cited by 1,147 · cited 2×
“Where time has been investigated, it has been the time available to learners at the pre-task stage, e.g. as time for planning or rehearsal (for example Ellis, 1987; Crookes, 1989; Foster and Skehan, 1996) rather than time allowed during the task itself.”
BackgroundThree Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866 · cited 1×
“Pedagogic tasks are derived from real-world tasks to ‘provide a vehicle for the presentation of appropriate target language samples to learners – input which they will inevitably reshape via application of general cognitive processing capacities’ (Long and Crookes, 1992: 43).”
BackgroundTask type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216889700100302 · Cited by 723
Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice
Crookes, G. V., & Gass, S. M. (1993) · Cited by 607
Challenge and Change in Language Teaching
Willis, J. R., & Willis, D. (1996) · Cited by 564
A Classroom Perspective on the Negotiation of Meaning
FOSTER, P. (1998) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/19.1.1 · Cited by 437
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Brown, G., 1986, Spoken language, 3
- Brown, G., 1984, Teaching talk
- Foster, P., 1997, Thames Valley Working Papers in ELT, 4, 38
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 257
Chapter 10. Formative, task-based oral assessments in an advanced Chinese-language class
Winke, P. M. (2014) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.6.10win · Cited by 9
Shachter, J. (2023) · Journal of Silence Studies in Education · doi:10.31763/jsse.v2i2.68 · Cited by 8
“This meaning most likely was reinforced by established pedagogical principles such as routine creation and repetition (Krashen & Scarcella, 1978; Lynch & Maclean, 2000).”
BackgroundMuhammadpour, M., Hassanzadeh-Taleshi, M., & Salehi-Amiri, F. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103933 · Cited by 10
Chapter 5. Task modality effects on Spanish learners’ interlanguage pragmatic development
Reagan, D., & Payant, C. (2018) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.10.05rea · Cited by 4
SIGNIFICANCE OF SOCIAL APPLICATIONS ON A MOBILE PHONE FOR ENGLISH TASK-BASED LANGUAGE LEARNING
Ahmad, A., & Farrukh, F. (2015) · Teaching English With Technology · Cited by 8
Task, task performance, and writing development
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M. (2014) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.7.11byr · Cited by 8
Whitehead, G. E. K., Ramos, I. D. D., & Coates, A. (2019) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.12.178 · Cited by 9
“In consideration of the existing expertise of the teacher trainees, an output-to-input approach was used (Lynch & Maclean, 2000), which pushed the trainees to the limits of their current ability and aimed to find which aspects of their English classroom language most required improvement.”
BackgroundMethodAndrade, J. M. D. S., Leonardo, M. E. M., & Torres, T. D. L. (2015) · Americanae (AECID Library) · doi:10.23925/2176-901x.2015v18i4p09-27 · Cited by 7
Promoting Self-Efficacy Through an Effective Human-Powered Nonvisual Smartphone Task Assistant
Rodrigues, A., Santos, A. J. D., Montague, K., & Guerreiro, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449188 · Cited by 7
“One of the arguments against task-based learning in second language learning is the difculty in creating tasks that are representative of the real world [26, 39].”
BackgroundHassanzadeh-Taleshi, M., Yaqubi, B., & Bozorgian, H. (2021) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2021.1901967 · Cited by 5
“…to the timing of subsequent performance(s) (Ahmadian and Tavakoli 2010; Bei 2013; Boers 2014; Bygate 2001, 2018; Fukuta 2016; Lambert et al. 2017; Lynch and Maclean 2000, 2001; Sample and Michel 2014; Thai and Boers 2016; Wang 2014), but the development of accuracy and complexity have been found…”
BackgroundKhezrlou, S. (2021) · Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.51751/dujal9458 · Cited by 9
“…with a one-day interval Explicit instruction Explicit instruction led to immediate and delayed explicit knowledge and delayed implicit knowledge gains Lynch and Maclean (2000) 14 learners in an ESP context Fluency (number of words per minute), accuracy (correct English structure use) Poster…”
BackgroundPonce, E. E. G., Lengeling, M. M., Pablo, I. M., & Arroyo, L. M. C. (2023) · Íkala Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura · doi:10.17533/udea.ikala.v28n1a04 · Cited by 11
“This finding aligns with the studies of Khezrlou (2020), Lambert et al. (2017), and Lynch and Maclean (2000, 2001), which all showed that task repetition increased both fluency and accuracy.”
ResultCommunicative Interaction in Language Learning Tasks among EFL Learners
Bagheri, M. S., Rahimi, F., & Riasati, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.4304/jltr.3.5.948-952 · Cited by 7
“Some studies with adult learners have explored the effects of repeating interactive tasks (Plough and Gass, 1993; Platt and Brooks, 1994; Brooks et al., 1997; Lynch and Maclean, 2000, 2001).”
BackgroundThe relationship between task repetition and language proficiency
Mojavezi, A. (2014) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 7
Hunter, A.-M. (2023) · TESOL Quarterly (Print) · doi:10.1002/tesq.3257 · Cited by 8
Enhancing young EFL learners’ written skills: the role of repeated pre-task planning
Gómez, J. G., Orcasitas-Vicandi, M., & Kopinska, M. (2024) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2023-0144 · Cited by 8
Assessing EFL learners’ written performance: The case of task repetition
Ajabshir, Z. F., & Poorebrahim, F. (2021) · Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies · doi:10.2989/16073614.2021.1942098 · Cited by 7
“The efficacy of task repetition in providing opportunities to practise novel linguistic features confirms the findings of some previous studies (e.g. Lynch and Maclean 2000; Ahmadian and Tavakoli 2010; Kim and Tracy-Ventura 2013).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRóg, T., & Krawiec, M. (2024) · TASK Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1075/task.00034.rog · Cited by 4
Effects of Different Types of Text-Based Chat on Korean EFL Students’ Writing Performance
Kim, N. (2017) · Korean Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.18855/lisoko.2017.42.3.003 · Cited by 6
Sirisatit, R. (2010) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 6
Preparing an L2 Role-play: How Students Manage L2 Deficits
Edstrom, A. M. (2013) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.1555 · Cited by 6
“Teachers can select some of the supplementary vocabulary incorporated into the role-plays, particularly high-frequency, non-specialized words, and recycle them in subsequent activities to help learners maintain them longer term (Lynch & Maclean, 2000; Webb, 2007).”
BackgroundType and amount of input-based practice in CALI: The revelations of a triangulated research design
Cerezo, L. (2016) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44448 · Cited by 6
“One group investigated the effects of amount of practice separately (Adams, 2003; Ahmadian, 2011; Ahmadian & Tavakoli, 2011; Bygate, 1996, 2001; Gass, Mackey, Fernández, & Álvarez-Torres, 1999; Lynch & Maclean, 2000, 2001; Wang, 2009).”
Textual Integrity and Coherence in the Qur'an: Repetition and Narrative Structure in Surat al-Baqara
El-Tahry, N. R. (2010) · Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · Cited by 6
Moussa, W. S., Louge, N., Pauwelyn, L., Contreras-Gomez, R., & Cao, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102290 · Cited by 5
Amiryousefi, M. (2016) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 5
Gan, Q., & Ma, L. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231186857 · Cited by 5
“…tasks (Dudley, 2007; Riggenbach, 1999), pre-task planning (Tavakoli & Skehan, 2005; Yuan & Ellis, 2003), task repetition (Ahmadian & Tavakoli, 2011; Lynch & Maclean, 2000), the 4/3/2 technique (Boers, 2014; Thai & Boers, 2016; Tran & Saito, 2021), and instructions on formulaic chunks or lexical…”
Cognitive computational model reveals repetition bias in a sequential decision-making task
Legler, E., Rivera, D. C., Schwöbel, S., Wagner, B., & Kiebel, S. J. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00271-0 · Cited by 7
“Itimproveslanguagelearning 10 ,likely through increased word-familiarity 11 and better learning of multiword expressions 12 .”
Research on language teaching and learning: 2000
Johnstone, R. (2001) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444800014312 · Cited by 5
Arredondo-Tapia, D. I., & García-Ponce, E. E. (2021) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2021.11202 · Cited by 5
Do young EFL learners benefit from task repetition?
Aaj, A., Maftoon, P., & Siyyari, M. (2023) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2023.2213706 · Cited by 4
“…times) and the time interval between the repeat performances (also known as spacing e ff ect) ranging from no time interval between the performances (Baleghiza-deh and Shahri 2017; Lambert, Kormos, and Minn 2016; Lynch and Maclean 2000) to several months (Azkarai and García Mayo 2017; Bygate 2001).”
The Effects Of Task based Learning On Male And Female Learners’ Proficiency And Noticing
Yaylı, Y. D. D. D. (2006) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 4
Yu, W.-T., & van Heuven, V. V. (2013) · Linguistics in the Netherlands · doi:10.1075/avt.30.15yu · Cited by 6
“Bygate’s (1996, 2001) studies on task repetition have revived the research into the area of task repetition and its pedagogical value in L2 oral proficiency (see for instance Lynch & Maclean 2000, 2001; Ahmadian & Tavakoli 2010; de Jong & Perfetti 2011).”
BackgroundZaccaron, R. (2018) · Domínios de Lingu gem · doi:10.14393/dl35-v12n3a2018-2 · Cited by 4
Factors Affecting Learner Collaboration in 3D Virtual Worlds
Kozlova, I. (2018) · Advances in linguistics and communication studies · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7286-2.ch002 · Cited by 4
Fahim, M., Nourzadeh, S., & Fathi, J. (2011) · International Journal of Education · doi:10.5296/ije.v3i2.1281 · Cited by 5
The Impact of Mixed Planning on the Accuracy of Iranian Learners’ Oral Performance
Seifoori, Z., & Birjandi, P. (2008) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 4
Ostovar‐Namaghi, S., & Gholami, M. (2018) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v11n3p60 · Cited by 6
Aref, G. S., & Mojavezi, A. (2019) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.1002.09 · Cited by 4
Effects of task repetition with the aid of direct and indirect written corrective feedback
Amelohina, V., Nicolás‐Conesa, F., & Manchón, R. M. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.56.07ame · Cited by 4
Selvi, A. F. (2012) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · Cited by 4
Cavicchio, F., & Busà, M. G. (2023) · Language Interaction and Acquisition · doi:10.1075/lia.22023.cav · Cited by 4
Albayrak, F., & Serin, N. (2022) · Psycho-Educational Research Reviews · doi:10.52963/perr_biruni_v11.n1.26 · Cited by 5
Chan, H. (2022) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12440 · Cited by 5
THE IMPACTS OF TASK-BASED LANGUAGE LEARNING ON ACCURACY OF EFL LEARNERS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCES
Quoc, P. D., Trang, N. T. T., & Thanh, C. V. (2023) · European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies · doi:10.46827/ejals.v6i1.431 · Cited by 3
Mostafaei-Alaei, M., & Mansouri, A. (2024) · International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2023-0066 · Cited by 3
Samaranayake, S. W. (2021) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3952986 · Cited by 6
Nagasaki, M., Armitage, K., & Orimoto, S. (2020) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220901348 · Cited by 3
“…is effective to improve some specific grammatical forms or vocabulary (Keck et al. 2006; Mackey and Goo, 2007), or accuracy of learners’ utterances (Lynch and Maclean, 2000; Lynch and Maclean, 2001), this study was able to reveal that it contributes to developing overall communication ability…”
BackgroundWeber, T. (2020) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2020.1741665 · Cited by 3
“Authentic texts would be gradually introduced and regularly ‘recycled’ (Lynch and Maclean 2000), ultimately enabling students to conduct their own studies on the materials.”
BackgroundSydorenko, T. (2011) · Michigan State University Libraries · doi:10.25335/m5rr1pt59 · Cited by 3
Jong, Y. O. (2026) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · doi:10.82444/warw.33491674 · Cited by 3
Sytch, M. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780197665183.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Task-based Learning Research and the Cognition Hypothesis: The Case of Task Complexity
Mohammadi, E. G., Yousefi, M. H., & Afghari, A. (2012) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.4304/tpls.2.12.2593-2602 · Cited by 2
Oral production A2+ in Italian as foreign language: autonomy and repetition tasks
Regagliolo, A. (2022) · Forum Filologiczne Ateneum · doi:10.36575/2353-2912/1(10)2022.215 · Cited by 2
Task Complexity and Its Implication for Pedagogy
Yousefi, M. H., Mohammadi, E. G., & Koosha, M. (2012) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.4304/tpls.2.7.1436-1444 · Cited by 2
“Furthermore, according to a more SLA perspective to advocacy of TBT, issues such as learnability, the order of acquisition of particular L2 structures, and the implications of the input, interaction and output hypothesis are central issues (Lynch & MacLean, 2000).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Task Repetition and Task Recycling on EFL Learners' Oral Performance
Baleghizadeh, S., & Asadı, R. (2013) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 2
Los procesos metodológicos de la enseñanza-aprendizaje de lenguas mediante tareas
Livingstone, K. A. (2010) · Cited by 2
Portugal, J. C. A. (2017) · Ikala: Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura · doi:10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n03a03 · Cited by 7
Defining and Assessing Chinese Syntactic Complexity via TC-Units
Yu, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Chinese linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5241-9 · Cited by 2
Fang, S. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.211215.024 · Cited by 2
“In 2000, Lynch and Maclean [13] conducted a communication-oriented study based on TR in an ESP (English for Specific Purposes) teaching context.”
BackgroundSchneider, C. (2023) · Ludic Language Pedagogy · doi:10.55853/llp_v5art2 · Cited by 2
Kos, T. (2024) · Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language--TESL-EJ · doi:10.55593/ej.28110a2 · Cited by 6
Song, H. J. (2008) · Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · Cited by 2
Assessing Speaking on the Duolingo English Test
Park, Y., Cardwell, R. L., Goodwin, S., Naismith, B., LaFlair, G. T., Lo, K.-L., & Yancey, K. (2023) · doi:10.46999/djiy3654 · Cited by 4
“Despite mixed empirical findings (see Kim & Tracy-Ventura, 2013), it has been argued that procedural repetition—repeating the same task but with different content—may facilitate some aspects of language proficiency while speaking (Bygate, 2001; Lynch & Maclean, 2000).”
BackgroundFocuses and Trends of the Research on Task-based Language Teaching (1998-2022)
Yu, P. G. (2023) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v16n9p102 · Cited by 1
“Lynch and Maclean (2000) found that task repetition could improve fluency and accuracy; Thai and Boers (2016) examined the repetition of monologue tasks and found a significant positive correlation between task repetition and fluency.”
Oral task repetition research via videoconferencing
Kakitani, J. (2025) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100232 · Cited by 3
Mansouri, M., Tavakoli, M., & Amirian, Z. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2579714 · Cited by 1
“For instance, Lynch and Maclean (2000), investigated the effects of task rehearsal on students ’ global accuracy and fluency, using a ‘ poster carousel ’ task.”
Singtong, S., Khemanuwong, T., Phairot, E., Srimanee, J., & Jitpanich, T. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2588056 · Cited by 1
“Notably, Ellis ’ post-task ‘ repeat performance ’ component has been shown to enhance both language complexity and accuracy (Lynch & Maclean, 2000).”
A scoping review of oral task repetition: Evolving concepts for speaking skills development
Hanzawa, K., Suzuki, Y., Yanagisawa, A., & Fukuta, J. (2026) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100292 · Cited by 1
Effects of translanguaging and task rehearsal on L2 speaking performance
Cheng, Z., & Sun, P. P. (2026) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2025-0057 · Cited by 1
“This is probably because task rehearsal, focusing on procedure rather than content, encourages students to use more concise language to achieve the same communicative goal and thereby improves accuracy in vocabulary, syntax, and pronunciation (Lynch and Maclean 2000).”
DEKEYSER, R. M. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667275.003 · Cited by 1
Task-based language teaching in a research perspective
Min, L. S., & MinDeokGi (2010) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2010.9.3.181 · Cited by 1
Translation in the UK language classroom
Barnes, K. (2020) · Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts · doi:10.1075/ttmc.00065.bar · Cited by 1
Iravani, N. (2023) · Educational Considerations · doi:10.4148/0146-9282.2354 · Cited by 1
“According to Lynch and Maclean (2000), a useful way to improve English learning is by setting up classroom tasks that reflect, as far as possible, the real-world tasks which the learners will perform.”
BackgroundSobhanifar, H., & Ranjbaran, F. (2023) · Journal of Contemporary Language Research · doi:10.58803/jclr.v2i2.67 · Cited by 1
Towards a Human-centered Tutorial Design for the Nautilus Cluster
Weekley, J. D., & Kurniawan, S. (2023) · Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing · doi:10.1145/3569951.3597601 · Cited by 1
“A task-based methodology is particularly well suited to teaching languages for specific purposes, such as learning the language of K8s control and YAML configuration used on Nautilus[4] [12].”
MethodPayant, C. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/3092374 · Cited by 1
Yläkoulun S2-oppilaiden transitiivi-ilmausten käyttö Eurooppalaisen viitekehyksen taitotasoilla
Reiman, N. (2014) · Lähivõrdlusi Lähivertailuja · doi:10.5128/lv24.07 · Cited by 1
Ansari, E., & Shafiee, S. (2018) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v8n6p148 · Cited by 1
“…results failed to show a statistically significant effect which seemed to run counter to the results of the studies such as Bygate (1996, 2001), Lynch and Maclean (2000) with regard to fluency, yet our results of fluency were compatible with some other previous studies like Yuan and Ellis’s…”
ResultUtjecaj ponavljanja zadatka na brzinu govorne izvedbe
Kovač, M. M. (2022) · Govor/Speech · doi:10.22210/govor.2022.39.01 · Cited by 1
Skuse, G. (2026) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · doi:10.82444/warw.33765046 · Cited by 1
Communicative Approaches in Teaching Spoken English Pre-service Teacher Education in EFL Contexts
Jang, H. (2014) · ELT Worldwide Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.26858/eltww.v1i1.839
“Task interaction improves comprehension of input through the negotiation of meaning (Pica et al., 1987) and task repetition also promotes speech development through input enhancement (Bygate, 2006; Lynch & Maclean, 2000).”
BackgroundManning, S. J. (2014) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17007418.v1
“Lynch and Maclean (Lynch & Maclean, 2000, 2001) developed and reported on a poster carousel activity for use with medical students learning English.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffects of Rehearsal on ESL Learners’ Responses to Test Tasks
Lavolette, B. (2013)
In other journals — a challenge!
Broady, E. (2002) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571730285200121
Learners' awareness of the role of input and task repetition on L2 speech production
Nishikawa, S. (2014) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Using Free Online Materials as the Basis of an Upper-Level IEP Listening and Speaking Course
Sheppard, B. (2014) · The CATESOL journal. · doi:10.5070/b5.36128
“For example, Lynch and Maclean (2000) found some improvements in both fluency and accuracy through task repetition alone and recommended an approach that included task repetition along with noticing activities and The CATESOL Journal 25.1 • 2013/2014 • 125 guidance from an instructor.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Comparative Effect of Personal and Narrative Tasks On EFL Learners' Speaking
Beitsayah, E. (2013)
Improving Learner Performance in Producing Grammatical Structures
Beh-Afarin, S. R., Asl, K. S., & Khayyer, M. (2011) · Journal of Universal Language
AN EXPLORATORY RESEARCH STUDY INTO CLASSROOM-BASED TASK REPETITION
Moser, J. S. (2008)
Curriculum and tasks in citizenship and language education
Murphy, D. F. (2015) · Ideas
D'Amico, M. (2014) · JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN LINGUISTICS · doi:10.24297/jal.v4i2.2142
Task-Based Approach as an Effective Tool in Developing Pragmatic Competence
Rayon, L. D. (2017) · JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.7719/jpair.v27i1.461
박부남 (2008) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.17936/pkelt.2008.20.4.011
Examining fluency practices: an interactional study of stuttering
Choo, A. L. (2013) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
The Effect of Output-based Task Repetition on EFL Learners’ Speech Act Production
Ahmadi, H., Ghaemi, F., & Birjandi, P. (2016) · Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.29252/ijal.19.2.1
Public engagement with a twist
Stevenson, E., Lynch, T., & Palfrey, J. G. (2016) · New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences · doi:10.29311/ndtps.v0i5.446
Self-citationDrood, P., & Asl, H. D. (2015) · Journal of applied linguistics and language research
The timing of explicit form-focused instruction and its impact on task outcomes
Hawkes, M. (2018) · Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) · doi:10.48780/publications.aston.ac.uk.00039074
عامر, ع. ا. م. م. (2019) · التربية (الأزهر) مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية) · doi:10.21608/jsrep.2019.64831
Effects of Preparation and Use of Keyword Lists on a Classroom Story-Retelling Test
Saito, H. (2017) · JALT Journal · doi:10.37546/jaltjj39.1-1
“…acquisition (SLA) have consistently shown that repeated practice improves the learner’s speaking performance on a task (Arevart & Nation, 1991; Bygate, 2001; Bygate & Samuda, 2005; Gass, Mackey, Alvarez-Torres, & FernándezGarcía, 1999; Kawauchi, 2005; Lynch & Maclean, 2000; Williams, 1992).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lynch, Tony
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-250
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2100519114
- Semantic Scholar
- 0f6c43b29fdd612672c59fda833d338675428a91
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- task repetition, task-based language teaching, English for specific purposes, interlanguage, learner proficiency level, communicative tasks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review