Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functions of oral monologic tasks: Effects of topic familiarity on L2 speaking performance

Qiu, Xuyan·2020·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

Tasks with different design factors may dissimilarly affect oral production, and thus can be adopted for different pedagogical purposes. However, the functions of task types are not fully explored. To address this gap, this study investigates the influence of content familiarity and task repetition on sixty English as a foreign language learners’ speaking performance, in terms of complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF). Participants twice performed four monologic tasks, and received stimulated recall interviews. The findings indicate that participants produced structurally more complex speech under familiar conditions, and increased their CAF in task repetition. Furthermore, content familiarity and task repetition may facilitate conceptualization. Task repetition may also direct participants’ attention towards lexical choices and grammatical encoding. Moreover, repeating unfamiliar topics effectively increased CAF. The findings suggest content familiarity and task repetition are two dimensions of topic familiarity, and that teachers might consider implementing task repetition when presenting unfamiliar topics to learners.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168819829021

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00012-4 · DOI
  2. Baker J., 2003, Essential speaking skills, 10.5040/9781350933958 · doi:10.5040/9781350933958
  3. 10.1177/1362168816656650 · DOI
  4. Bui H.Y.G., 2014, Processing perspectives on task performance: Volume 5, 63
  5. Bygate M., 2001, Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing, 23
  6. 10.2307/3586498 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  9. 10.1093/applin/13.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/026553229200900206 · DOI
  11. Ellis R., 2003, Task-based language learning and teaching
  12. 10.1002/9781118271643 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/applin/21.3.354 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Guiraud P., 1954, Les caractères statistiques du vocabulaire [The statistical characteristics of vocabulary]
  15. Holm S., 1979, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65
  16. 10.2307/3587952 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1177/0265532215595666 · DOI
  18. Kormos J., 2006, Speech production and second language acquisition
  19. 10.1075/tblt.2.06ch2 · DOI
  20. Lambert C., 2014, Task sequencing and instructed second language learning, 207
  21. 10.1515/applirev-2012-0009 · doi:10.1515/applirev-2012-0009
  22. 10.1017/S0272263104040033 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/S0272263104261022 · DOI
  24. Levelt W.J.M., 1999, The neurocognition of language, 83
  25. Long M.H., 2015, Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching
  26. 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00060.x · DOI
  27. 10.1075/tblt.4.06mal · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00563.x · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1362168816683561 · DOI
  30. 10.1515/iral-2016-9995 · DOI
  31. Qiu X., 2018, Language Teaching Research, 21, 681
  32. Raatz U., 1981, Practice and problems in language testing: Proceedings of the Fourth International Language Testing Symposium of the Interuniversitäre Sprachtestgruppe, 113
  33. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.012 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1075/tblt.2 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1515/iral-2016-9991 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/applin/17.1.38 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1075/tblt.5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.4324/9781315629766 · DOI
  39. 10.1075/lllt.11.12ske · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1515/iral-2016-9992 · DOI

Cited by

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Qiu, X.
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2019-02-13
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
745-764
ISSN
  • 1362-1688
  • 1477-0954
Cited by
40
References
9
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.