Cited by 132

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Behavioural and physiological responses to the emotional and taboo Stroop tasks in native and non-native speakers of English

Eilola, Tiina M., Havelka, Jelena·2011·International Journal of Bilingualism

Abstract

Skin conductance levels (SCLs) of native and non-native English speakers were measured during emotional and taboo Stroop tasks. Significantly slower response times to negative and taboo words when compared to neutral words were found in both groups of participants, but positive words were not found to differ significantly from neutral words. No differences between native and non-native speakers in their behavioural responses were present: the pattern of interference from negative and taboo words was found to be identical in L1 and L2. SCLs, however, did reveal differences between the native and non-native participants: native English speakers responded with significantly higher SCLs to negative and taboo words when compared with neutral and positive words. This difference was not observed in non-native speakers, although there was a trend for taboo words to elicit greater SCLs than positive words. This suggests that, although the two groups responded in a very similar manner on a behavioural level, the level of arousal produced by the negative and taboo words for native English speakers was greater than that for non-native speakers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1367006910379263

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.323 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Altarriba, J., 2004, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 248, 10.1080/01434630408666531 · DOI
  3. Andreassi, J.L., 2000, Psychophysiology: Human behavior and physiological response
  4. 10.1080/02699939408408956 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/02699930341000301 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/S1366728909990125 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.3758/BF03193014 · DOI
  8. Bond, M.H., 1986, Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 179
  9. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5093-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bradley, M.M., 1999, Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical report C-1
  11. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1080/01434630408666529 · DOI
  14. 10.3758/PBR.15.5.961 · DOI
  15. 10.3758/BRM.42.1.134 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/02699930601054109 · DOI
  17. Gonzales-Reigosa, F. ( 1976). The anxiety-arousing effect of taboo words in bilinguals . In C. D. Spielberger & R. Diaz-Guerrero (Eds.), Cross-cultural anxiety (pp. 89-105). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  18. 10.1080/01434630408666530 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S0142716403000286 · DOI
  20. 10.21832/9781853598746-012 · DOI
  21. Hugdahl, K., 2001, Psychophysiology: The mind-body perspective
  22. 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56008-X · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.3758/BF03192770 · DOI
  24. 10.3758/BF03195840 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/BF02686591 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1595 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/CBO9780511584305 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Psychology Software Tools, Inc., 2002, E-Prime
  29. 10.1177/1354067X0064001 · DOI
  30. 10.1348/000712601162293 · DOI
  31. 10.1037/h0054651 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/02699930601054133 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Eilola, T. M., & Havelka, J.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London, UK
  • University of Leeds, UK,
Venue
International Journal of Bilingualism
Published
2010-11-29
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
353-369
ISSN
  • 1367-0069
  • 1756-6878
Cited by
132
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review