The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland
Abstract
Two studies examined the relationship between collective narcissism—an emotional investment in an unrealistic belief about the greatness of an in-group (Golec de Zavala, Cichocka, Eidelson, & Jayawickreme, 2009) — and anti-Semitism in Poland. The results indicate that this relationship is simultaneously mediated by (a) a belief that the in-group is constantly threatened by hostile intentions of other groups (Polish siege beliefs; Bar-Tal & Antebi, 1992a , 1992b ) and (b) a belief that the Jews are a particularly threatening out-group because they secretly aim to dominate the world (the conspiracy stereotype of Jews; Bergmann, 2008 ; Kofta & Sędek, 2005 ). These results confirm that collective narcissism predicts prejudice against social groups perceived as threatening. Collective narcissists’ sensitivity to intergroup threat is composed of beliefs about vulnerability of the in-group and hostility of the out-group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In addition, research shows that (1) collective narcissism is related to conspiratorial thinking and a conviction that certain outgroups secretly plot against the ingroup,”
From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Golec de Zavala & Cichocka, 2012
In the citing paper
“Jewish conspiracy theory beliefs are related to prejudice and discrimination against Jewish people [25][26][27][28] and several other outgroups [29**].”
From The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 · Cited by 6,552
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Cohen R., 1991, Attitudes toward Jews in Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia. A comparative survey
- Golec de Zavala A., 2007, Paper presented at the ISPP 30th Annual Scientific Meeting
- Kruglanski A. W., 2010, Paper presented at Annual Conference of Society of Experimental Social Psychology
- Krzemiński I., 2004, Antysemityzm w Polsce i na Ukrainie. Raport z badań
- Muthén L. K., 2010, Mplus user’s guide
- Wójcik A., 2008, Różni razem, 256
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12568 · Cited by 1,511
Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698017701615 · Cited by 764
Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain
van Prooijen, J., & Douglas, K. M. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2530 · Cited by 483
Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms
van Prooijen, J.-W., & van Vugt, M. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618774270 · Cited by 414
Cichocka, A. K., Marchlewska, M., & de Zavala, A. G. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615616170 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- Golec de Zavala, A., & Cichocka, A.
- Affiliations
- Middlesex University, UK
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- ORCID
- Cichocka, Aleksandra
- Venue
- Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-10-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-229
- ISSN
- 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7188
- OpenAlex
- W1996818403
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-06-15)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (publishedVersion)
- Goldsmiths Research Online (acceptedVersion)
- Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (acceptedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › European Cultural and National Identity
- Keywords
- collective narcissism, antisemitism, intergroup threat, prejudice, outgroup hostility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
