Cited by 226Corporate Management and LeadershipLeadership and Management in OrganizationsOrganizational Change and Leadership

Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis

Open access
Tigre, Fernanda Bethlem, Curado, Carla, Henriques, Paulo Lopes·2023·Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

Abstract

Digital disruption has changed organizations in an unprecedented way. The thriving field of digital leadership is expanding fast and few retrospective studies on this evolution have been made so far. This study presents a bibliometric and network analysis combining both Scopus and Web of Science databases to provide fresh insights into the evolution of the digital leadership research field. This study is based on a review of 79 publications from 57 journals, published between 2000 and 2020. The newness of the topic and the range of journals in which it is published confirms that digital leadership has gained interest from several different areas. Bibliometric analysis provides a description of the research field identifying the leading publishing journals, affiliation statistics, and most influential authors and expressive publications in the research field. Network analyses identify keyword evolution over time, co-citation relationships, and research clusters. Content analysis is used to identify key topics in the field with attention paid to interrelations among them. A brief description of each paper in the dataset and its methodological approach is provided. The results suggest that the topic will continue to attract more research, as it has not yet entered its maturity stage. This paper contributes to the literature by analyzing the relationship between digital leadership and e-leadership. This study also identifies the most leading digital leadership capabilities for a fast-changing world. Limitations and future avenues are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15480518221123132

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technologies predicted to play an essential role in future e-leadership practices, such as embedded tracking systems, internet of things, and artificial intelligence, play no role in the current technostress literature on leadership.

    “Technologies that were predicted to play an essential role in future e-leadership practices like embedded tracking systems, internet of things, artificial intelligence (Avolio et al. 2014;Tigre et al. 2023), play no role in the current technostress literature on leadership.”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Tigre et al. 2023

    In Conclusions, Limitations, and Future Work (page unavailable), the paper suggests that artificial intelligence and the internet of things may become a major focus of digital leadership. It does not mention embedded tracking systems or assess whether these technologies play a role in the technostress literature on leadership. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Leadership's impact on technostress presents a perspective that had not yet been addressed in previous reviews or meta-studies of e-leadership or digital leadership.

    “While research on digital leadership deals with the relationship between leadership and ICT on outcomes such as team effectiveness, productivity, or the factors that facilitate ICT adoption (Avolio et al. 2014), leadership's impact on technostress presents a perspective that had not yet been addressed in previous reviews or meta-studies of e-leadership or digital leadership (Avolio et al. 2014;Tig”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Tigre et al. 2023

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies earlier reviews of e-leadership and digital leadership, but does not say whether they addressed leadership’s impact on technostress. Searches for “technostress” and technology-related stress found no passage in our copy establishing the claimed gap in previous reviews or meta-studies. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. Anoye, A. B., & Kouamé, J. S. (2018). Leadership challenges in virtual team environment. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 160-167.
  2. Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K. W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to home- maker? Debiasing word embeddings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29, 4356-4364.
  3. Camps, T. W. A. (2009). Two images of the future: Virtual leadership and leadership in organisation. Journal of Chain and Network Science, 9(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2009.x169 · DOI
  4. DasGupta, P. (2011). Literature review: E-leadership. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4(1), 1-36.
  5. Kane, G. C., Phillips, A. N., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. (2019). How digital leadership is(n't) different. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39.
  6. Kerfoot, K. M. (2010). Listening to see: The key to virtual leader- ship. Nursing Economics, 28(2), 114.
  7. Meghana, J., & Vijaya, R. (2019). E-leadership, psychological contract and real-time performance management: Remotely working professionals. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 16(3), 101-111.
  8. Perizade, B., Eka, D., Widiyanti, M., Adam, M., & Muhtia, F. (2017). Virtual leadership: Concept, expectation and future. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(10), 227-239.
  9. Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A. L., Hren, L. M., Durman, O. L., Bondarchuk, N. V., & Vorobets, V. (2020). Management mechanisms in the context of digitization of all spheres of society. Revista San Gregorio, 42(special edition), 1-9.
  10. Pulley, M. L., Sessa, V., & Malloy, M. (2002). E-leadership: A two-pronged idea. T + D, 56(3), 34-47.
  11. Richardson, J. W., Clemons, J., & Sterrett, W. (2020a). How super- intendents use technology to engage stakeholders. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 5(4), 954-988. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2020.4.1 · DOI
  12. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Morgan & Claypool. https://doi.org/10. 2200/s00688ed1v01y201512vis006. · DOI
  13. Agustina, R., Kamdi, W., Hadi, S., & Nurhadi, D. (2020). Influence of the principal´s digital leadership on the reflective practices of vocational teachers mediated by trust, self efficacy, and work engagement. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(11), 24-40.
  14. Aksal, F. A. (2015). Are headmasters digital leaders in school culture?. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 40(182), 77-86. Non-organizational scope
  15. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K. Y., & Tal, S. A. (2008). E-empowerment: Empowerment by the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1776-1789.
  16. Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2020). Leadership types and digital leadership in higher education: Behavioural data analysis from University of Patras in Greece. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(4), 110-129.
  17. Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2019). Transition from educational leadership to e-leadership: A data analysis report from TEI of Western Greece. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 238-255.
  18. Arain, G. A. (2018). The impact of leadership style on moral identity and subsequent in-role performance: A moderated mediation analysis. Ethics & Behavior, 28(8), 613-627.
  19. Arânik M.Z. (2012). Leadership for learning through the lens of the candidates for headship. Didactica Slovenica -Pedagoska Obzorja, 27(5), 19-35.
  20. Asree, S., Zain, M., & Razalli, M. R. (2010). Influence of leadership competency and organizational culture on responsiveness and performance of firms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(4), 500-526 Search terms missing
  21. Bang, J., Youn, S., Rowean, J., Jennings, M., & Austin, M. (2018). Motivations for and outcomes of participating in research online communities. International Journal of Market Research, 60(3), 238-256.
  22. Blau, I., & Presser, O. (2013). E-Leadership of school principals: Increasing school effectiveness by a school data management system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1000-1011.
  23. Blom, M., & Alvesson, M. (2014). Leadership on demand: Followers as initiators and inhibitors of managerial leadership. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(3), 344-357.
  24. Boon, O. K., Arumugam, V., Safa, M. S., & Bakar, N. A. (2007). HRM and TQM: Association with job involvement. Personnel Review, 36(6), 939-962.
  25. Chang, W. L., & Lee, C. Y. (2013). Virtual team e-leadership: The effects of leadership style and conflict management mode on the online learning performance of students in a business-planning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 986-999.
  26. Chinda, T., & Mohamed, S. (2008). Structural equation model of construction safety culture. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(2), 114-131. Search terms missing (continued) Reference Exclusion reason
  27. Dang, G. P., & Basur, P. (2018). Organic leadership style and employee engagement: the mediating effect of social relevance of work in context of faculty members in higher education. PURUSHARTHA-A Journal of Management, Ethics and Spirituality, 10(1), 107-116.
  28. Day, D. V., Sin, H. P., & Chen, T. T. (2004). Assessing the burdens of leadership: Effects of formal leadership roles on individual performance over time. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 573-605.
  29. de Freitas, S., & Routledge, H. (2013). Designing leadership and soft skills in educational games: The e-leadership and soft skills educational games design model (ELESS). British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 951-968.
  30. de Jonge, W. (2006). Supporting civil society and NGOs in Eastern Europe: Some lessons learned. Helsinki Monitor, 17(4), 307-312.
  31. Dervitsiotis, K. N. (2010). A framework for the assessment of an organisation's innovation excellence. Total Quality Management, 21(9), 903-918.
  32. Dervitsiotis, K. N. (2010). A framework for the assessment of an organisation's innovation excellence. Total Quality Management, 21(9), 903-918.
  33. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teacher's professional development in the United States. Psychology. Society and Education, 7(3), 252-263.
  34. Dimitriadi, Y. (2019). Who You're Gonna Call? The development of university digital leaders: A case study. Media Studies, 10(19), 102-118.
  35. Dubey, R., Singh, T., & Ali, S. S. (2015). The mediating effect of human resource on successful total quality management implementation: An empirical study on SMEs in manufacturing sectors. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(7), 1463-1480.
  36. Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569-574. Search terms missing
  37. Falkenthal, E., & Byrne, A. M. (2021). Distributed leadership in collegiate esports. Simulation & Gaming, 52(2), 185-203.
  38. Flannery, K. B., & McGrath Kato, M. (2017). Implementation of SWPBIS in high school: Why is it different?. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(1), 69-79.
  39. Fryman C., Fei A., Mehta R., Ahmad S. (2018). Jigsaw method for non-technical skills in cardiac arrest: A novel application of this active learning pedagogy. Medical Science Educator, 28(2), 401-405.
  40. Goh, J., Truman, B., & Barber, D. (2019). Exploring individual differences as factors to maximize interactive learning environments for future learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 497-507.
  41. Hai-Jew, S. (2004). Washington online virtual campus: Infusing culture in dispersed web-based higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1-19.
  42. Horwitz, S. K., & Santillan, C. (2012). Knowledge sharing in global virtual team collaboration: Applications of CE and thinklets. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10(4), 342-353.
  43. Hui, R. T. Y., Law, K. K., & Lau, S. C. P. (2021). Online or offline? Coaching media as mediator of the relationship between coaching style and employee work-related outcomes. Australian Journal of Management, 46(2), 326-345.
  44. Ibrahim, M. Y. (2014). Model of e-leadership, intra-team communication and job satisfaction among school leaders in Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1927-1927.
  45. Issahaka, A. W., & Lines, R. (2020). Research literature on leadership of knowledge workers: where are we, and where should we be heading?. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(1), 122-148.
  46. Jackson, N. C., & Dunn-Jensen, L. M. (2021). Leadership succession planning for today's digital transformation economy: Key factors to build for competency and innovation. Business Horizons, 64(2), 273-284.
  47. Jain, V., Pich, C., Ganesh, B. E., & Armannsdottir, G. (2017). Exploring the influences of political branding: a case from the youth in India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 9(3), 190-211.
  48. Jalal, A. N., Bahari, M., Tarofder, A. K., & Musa, W. M. N. M. W. (2019). Factors influencing customer social relationship management implementation and its benefits in healthcare industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 196-205.
  49. Jameson, J. (2013). E-leadership in higher education: The fifth "age" of educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 889-915.
  50. Jameson, J. (2011). Leadership of shared spaces in online learning communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 7(4), 463-477.
  51. Jones, E., Kantak, D. M., Futrell, C. M., & Johnston, M. W. (1996). Leader behavior, work-attitudes, and turnover of salespeople: An integrative study. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 16(2), 13-23. Search terms missing / Year out of search period
  52. Khattak, S. R., Saeed, I., Rehman, S. U., & Fayaz, M. (2020). Impact of fear of COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of nurses in Pakistan. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 6(5), 421-435.
  53. Kidd, W. (2012). Utilising podcasts for learning and teaching: A review and ways forward for e-Learning cultures. Management in Education, 26(2), 52-57.
  54. Kim, Y. M., Newby-Bennett, D., & Song, H. J. (2012). Knowledge sharing and institutionalism in the healthcare industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(3), 480-494. Search terms missing (continued) Reference Exclusion reason
  55. Kociatkiewicz, J., & Kostera, M. (2012). The good manager: An archetypical quest for morally sustainable leadership. Organization Studies, 33(7), 861-878.
  56. Kokkinos, C. M., Charalambous, K., & Davazoglou, A. (2010). Primary school teacher interpersonal behavior through the lens of students' Eysenckian personality traits. Social Psychology of Education, 13(3), 331-349.
  57. Koohang, A., Anderson, J., Nord, J. H., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2019). Building an awareness-centered information security policy compliance model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(1), 231-247.
  58. Koohang, A., Nowak, A., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Nord, J. H. (2020). Information security policy compliance: leadership, trust, role values, and awareness. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(1), 1-8.
  59. Korzynski, P. (2013). Online social networks and leadership: Implications of a new online working environment for leadership. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 975-994.
  60. Kuscu, M., & Arslan, H. (2016). Virtual leadership at distance education teams. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 136-156.
  61. La Rose, T. (2019). Rediscovering social work leaders through YouTube as archive: The CASW oral history project 1983/1984. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(2-3), 93-112.
  62. Lam, P. H. C., & Woodhead, P. (2012). A critical analysis of the challenges facing e-leaders in the 21st Century: A review and comparison of the information and communication technology development of a public school and a public independent school in Hong Kong. International Journal of Learning, 18(3), 131-146.
  63. Park, C. L., & Paiva, E. L. (2018). How do national cultures impact the operations strategy process?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(10), 1937-1963.
  64. Leung, Y. K., Franken, I., Thurik, R., Driessen, M., Kamei, K., Torrès, O., & Verheul, I. (2021). Narcissism and entrepreneurship: Evidence from six datasets. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15, e00216. Search terms missing
  65. Levesque, P. (2012). Virtual leadership in nursing education. Nurse Educator, 37(5), 211-213.
  66. Li, P. P., Bai, Y., & Xi, Y. (2012). The contextual antecedents of organizational trust: A multidimensional cross-level analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8(2), 371-396.
  67. Li, W. D., Li, S., Feng, J. J., Wang, M. O., Zhang, H., Frese, M., & Wu, C. H. (2021). Can becoming a leader change your personality? An investigation with two longitudinal studies from a role-based perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(6), 882-901. Search terms missing / Year out of search period
  68. Lichtenthaler, P. W., & Fischbach, A. (2018). Leadership, job crafting, and employee health and performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 620-632.
  69. Martínez, M. L., Loyola, L. I., & Cumsille, P. (2017). Quality of participation in youth organizations: Relationships with identity and sense of sociopolitical control. Youth & Society, 49(7), 968-993.
  70. McGillivray, D., McPherson, G., Jones, J., & McCandlish, A. (2016). Young people, digital media making and critical digital citizenship. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 724-738.
  71. McGregor, A., Magee, C. A., Caputi, P., & Iverson, D. (2016). A job demands-resources approach to presenteeism. Career Development International, 21(4), 402-418.
  72. McLeod, S. (2015). Facilitating administrators' instructional leadership through the use of a technology integration discussion protocol. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(3), 227-233.
  73. Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., & Litano, M. L. (2017). A multilevel examination of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 379-393.
  74. Mukesh, H. V., Prabhu, N., Koodamara, N. K., Chakraborty, S., & Kamath, P. (2020). Entrepreneurial potential of students of MBA and engineering schools in the Indian context: Roles of leadership and achievement motivation. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 782-810.
  75. Nelson G., Caplan R., MacLeod T., Macnaughton E., Cherner R., Aubry T., Méthot C., Latimer E., Piat M., Plenert E., McCullough S., Zell S., Patterson M., Stergiopoulos V., Goering P. (2017). What happens after the demonstration phase? The sustainability of Canada's at home/chez Soi housing first programs for homeless persons with mental illness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1-2), 144-157.
  76. Obal, M., Morgan, T., & Joseph, G. (2020). Integrating sustainability into new product development: The role of organizational leadership and culture. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 30(1), 43-57. Search terms missing
  77. Obschonka, M., Duckworth, K., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schoon, I. (2012). Social competencies in childhood and adolescence and entrepreneurship in young adulthood: A two-study analysis. International Journal of Developmental Science, 6(3-4), 137-150.
  78. Ooi, K. B., Lin, B., Teh, P. L., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2012). Does TQM support innovation performance in Malaysia's manufacturing industry?. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(2), 366-393. Search terms missing (continued) Reference Exclusion reason
  79. Ooi, K. B., Lin, B., Teh, P. L., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2012). Does TQM support innovation performance in Malaysia's manufacturing industry?. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(2), 366-393.
  80. Park, S. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109-142.
  81. Paunova, M. (2017). Who gets to lead the multinational team? An updated status characteristics perspective. Human Relations, 70(7), 883-907.
  82. Peterson, N. A., Lowe, J. B., Hughey, J., Reid, R. J., Zimmerman, M. A., & Speer, P. W. (2006). Measuring the intrapersonal component of psychological empowerment: Confirmatory factor analysis of the sociopolitical control scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3-4), 287-297.
  83. Phipps, S. A. A. (1991). Family systems functioning, family health roles, and utilization of physical health services. Lifestyles, 12(1), 23-41. Search terms missing / Year out of search period
  84. Pitakkornrat, P., & Pongsiri, P. (2020). A structural equation model of knowledge management strategy to develop best practice for industrial business in Thailand. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(2), 1-13. Search terms missing
  85. Preston, J. P., Moffatt, L., Wiebe, S., McAuley, A., Campbell, B., & Gabriel, M. (2015). The use of technology in Prince Edward Island (Canada) high schools: Perceptions of school leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 989-1005.
  86. Quigley, N. R. (2013). A longitudinal, multilevel study of leadership efficacy development in MBA teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(4), 579-602.
  87. Rennick, L. A., Smedley, C. T., Fisher, D., Wallace, E., & Kim, Y. K. (2013). The effects of spiritual/religious engagement on college students' affective outcomes: Differences by gender and race. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 22(3), 301-322.
  88. Rich, A. B. (1997). Continuous improvement: The key to future success. Quality Progress, 30(6), 33-38. Search terms missing / Year out of search period
  89. Rickard, M. K., Marshall, G. W., & Rutherford, B. N. (2018). Antecedents leading to perceived franchise support. Journal of Marketing Channels, 25(3), 157-169.
  90. Sanders, M. G. (1999). Schools' programs and progress in the national network of partnership schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(4), 220-229. Search terms missing / Year out of search period
  91. Schutte, N., Barkhuizen, N., & Van der Sluis, L. (2016). The development of a human resource management (HRM) professional competence model: A pilot study. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 26(3), 230-236.
  92. Sharpp, T. J., Lovelace, K., Cowan, L. D., & Baker, D. (2019). Perspectives of nurse managers on information communication technology and e-leadership. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(7), 1554-1562.
  93. Slåtten, T., Lien, G., & Svensson, G. (2018). The value of cultivating norms for market orientation in professional service firms. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 10(3), 316-330.
  94. Smith, S. F., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2013). Psychopathy in the workplace: The knowns and unknowns. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 204-218.
  95. Soga, L. R., Vogel, B., Graça, A. M., & Osei-Frimpong, K. (2020). Web 2.0-enabled team relationships: an actor-network perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1-14. Search terms missing
  96. Srimindarti, C., Oktaviani, R. M., Hardiningsih, P., & Udin, U. (2020). Determinants of job satisfaction and performance of auditors: A case study of Indonesia. Calitatea, 21(178), 84-89.
  97. Suutari, V. (1996). Leadership ideologies among European managers: A comparative survey in a multinational company. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 12(4), 389-409. Search terms missing / Year out of search period
  98. Teh, P. L., Yong, C. C., Arumugam, V., & Ooi, K. B. (2009). Does total quality management reduce employees' role conflict?. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(8), 1118-1136.
  99. Tondeur, J., Devos, G., Van Houtte, M., Van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2009). Understanding structural and cultural school characteristics in relation to educational change: the case of ICT integration. Educational Studies, 35(2), 223-235.
  100. Trienekens J., van Velzen M., Lees N., Saunders C., Pascucci S. (2018). Governance of market-oriented fresh food value chains: Export chains from New Zealand. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 21(2), 249-268.
  101. Tuzovic, S; Wirtz, J; Heracleous, L. (2018). How do innovators stay innovative? A longitudinal case analysis. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(1), 34-45. Search terms missing
  102. Valléry G., Leduc S. (2016). Supervision practices and ICT' uses: An example in National gendarmerie. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 22(1), 39-53.
  103. Vázquez E. (2013). Open government and e-leadership in schools mediated by ICT. Croatian Journal of Education, 15(1), 11-41. Non-organizational scope
  104. Wallace D.M., Torres E.M., Zaccaro S.J. (2021). Just what do we think we are doing? Learning outcomes of leader and leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101494. Reference Exclusion reason Westberg K.L., Archambault Jr. F.X. (1997). A multi-site case study of successful classroom practices for high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(1), 42-51. Search terms missing
  105. Wituk S.A., Shepherd M.D., Warren M., Meissen G. (2002). Factors contributing to the survival of self-help groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(3), 349-366.
  106. Wu B., Yu X., Hu Y. (2019). How does principal e-leadership affect ICT transformation across different school stages in K-12 education: Perspectives from teachers in Shanghai. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1210-1225.
  107. Yildirim H., Saygin S. (2011). Effects of owners' leadership style on manufacturing family firms' entrepreneurial orientation in the emerging economies: An emprical investigation in Turkey. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 32, 26-32. Search terms missing
  108. Young A., Wilkins E. (2008). Dispositional statements on student teacher evaluation instruments: Commonalities across institutions. Teacher Educator, 43(3), 198-215.
  109. Yu B., Gerido L., He Z. (2017). Exploring text classification of social support in online health communities for people who are D/deaf and hard of hearing. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 840-841.
  110. Zagorsek H., Stough S.J., Jaklic M. (2006). Analysis of the reliability of the leadership practices inventory in the item response theory framework. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(2), 180-191.
  111. Zieba M., Zieba K. (2014). Knowledge management critical success factors and the innovativeness of KIBS companies. Engineering Economics, 25(4), 458-465. Search terms missing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tigre, F. B., Curado, C., & Henriques, P. L.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Tigre, Fernanda Bethlem
Venue
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Published
2022-09-09
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
40-70
ISSN
  • 1548-0518 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-7089
OpenAlex
W4295066473
Cited by
226
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 1
FWCI
43.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
FCT- Fundação para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (research grant UIDB/04521/2020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
Keywords
digital leadership, digital disruption, research evolution, research trends, co-citation networks, research clusters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review