Cited by 45Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Treatment

Translation and validation of Simplified Chinese version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in chronic pain patients: Education may matter

Open access
Shen, Bangli, Wu, Bo, Abdullah, Taha B, Zhan, Gonghao, Lian, Qingquan, Vania Apkarian, Apkar, Huang, Lejian·2018·Molecular Pain

Abstract

Objective: Pain catastrophizing is linked to many aspects of pain perception and defines a unique dimension in predicting pain intensity and physical disability. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is an effective, validated,self-report measure, commonly used in clinical trials. Here, we present a Simplified Chinese PCS (SC-PCS) version developed in Chinese patients suffering from chronic pain. Methods: The SC-PCS was generated in five steps and tested on an initial patient cohort (N = 30). A convenience sample (N = 200) of in-hospital patients with non-malignant pain lasting for more than 12 weeks were recruited for the study, of which 81 completed 5 additional pain questionnaires. A subset (N = 24) of the patients completed an additional SC-PCS, 10 days after the initial query to assess test–retest validation. Results: Intra-class correlations coefficient indicated high reproducibility and temporal consistency, (0.97), for the total score. Cronbach’s alpha determined high internal consistency across the SC-PCS total score and its three subscales (0.87, 0.85, 0.62, and 0.65). The SC-PCS total score moderately or weakly (R = −0.2 to 0.49), but significantly, correlated with other measurements, such as pain Visual Analog Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scales, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and education. We used exploratory factor analysis to examine the dimensionality of the SC-PCS, which indicated instability of the current three-factor model. However, a confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the three-factor model had the best goodness-fitting. Conclusions: We demonstrate the successful translational adaptation from English to Simplified Chinese as well as the reliability and validity of SC-PCS. An important discovery was education level significantly correlated with SC-PCS, identifying a future consideration for other cross-cultural development of self-reported measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1744806918755283

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All the measures employed have excellent or good internal consistency and test-retest reliability and are widely used as outcome measures in chronic pain services.

    “All the measures employed have excellent or good internal consistency and test-retest reliability 9,10,14 -16 and are widely used as outcome measures in chronic pain services.”

    From A service evaluation to examine the effectiveness of chronic pain management programmes delivered using video conferencing technology compared to in-person (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Abstract (Results; page unavailable) reports good internal consistency for the Simplified Chinese Pain Catastrophizing Scale total score (α = 0.87) and excellent test–retest reproducibility (ICC = 0.97). The paper does not establish these properties for all measures employed: two SC-PCS subscales had lower internal consistency (α = 0.62 and 0.65). It also does not establish that the measures are widely used as outcomes in chronic pain services. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Published reliable change values were not found for the PSEQ, CPAQ and PCS questionnaires, so Criterion A on the Leeds RCI calculator, which uses Cronbach's alpha as a reliability measure, was used with values from several large studies: PSEQ = 0.94, CPAQ = 0.90 and PCS = 0.87.

    “Published reliable change values were not found for the PSEQ, CPAQ and PCS questionnaires. Therefore, we used Criterion A on the Leeds RCI calculator which uses Cronbach ' s alpha as a reliability measure, and were found from several large studies as follows: PSEQ = 0.94, 11 CPAQ = 0.90, 15 and PCS = 0.87. 16”
  • Pain catastrophizing will be assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).

    “Pain catastrophizing will be assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). PCS consists of 13 items, and each item will be answered with a numeric value between 0 and 4; 0 corresponded to “not at all,” and 4 corresponded to “all the time.” Higher scores indicate a higher level of pain catastrophizing [30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, B., Wu, B., Abdullah, T. B., Zhan, G., Lian, Q., Vania Apkarian, A., & Huang, L.
Affiliations
  • Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • China-USA Neuroimaging Research Institute, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Corresponding author
Huang, Lejian
Venue
Molecular Pain
Published
2018-01
Volume
14
Pages
1744806918755283-1744806918755283
ISSN
1744-8069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2784690968
Cited by
44
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Pain (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wenzhou Medical University
  • Wenzhou University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, cross-cultural adaptation, chronic pain, test-retest reliability, factor structure, educational attainment, self-report measures, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Demography, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review