The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time
Abstract
Disagreements about the optimal level of wealth inequality underlie policy debates ranging from taxation to welfare. We attempt to insert the desires of "regular" Americans into these debates, by asking a nationally representative online panel to estimate the current distribution of wealth in the United States and to "build a better America" by constructing distributions with their ideal level of inequality. First, respondents dramatically underestimated the current level of wealth inequality. Second, respondents constructed ideal wealth distributions that were far more equitable than even their erroneously low estimates of the actual distribution. Most important from a policy perspective, we observed a surprising level of consensus: All demographic groups-even those not usually associated with wealth redistribution such as Republicans and the wealthy-desired a more equal distribution of wealth than the status quo.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Using the same measure, another study found that both groups are about equally divided in their beliefs and ideals about income inequality (Norton and Ariely, 2011).”
From Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans: source or epiphenomenon of ideological and affective polarization? (2024) · cites this paper as Norton and Ariely, 2011
In the citing paper
“their preferred distribution of wealth among citizens was closer to equality than even their own incorrect estimations of the distribution”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Norton and Ariely (2011)
In the citing paper
“respondents greatly underestimated the degree of wealth inequality in the United States, believing that the wealthiest 20% of the population owned 59% of the wealth, where the actual figure is 84%”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Norton and Ariely (2011)
In the citing paper
“This also held for wealthy respondents and Republican voters – albeit to a lesser extent than their poorer and Democrat counterparts.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Norton and Ariely (2011)
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Polarized America: the dance of ideology and unequal riches
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-3551 · Cited by 1,793
Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G.-M. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828054825655 · Cited by 1,521
The spirit level: why greater equality makes societies stronger
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5973 · Cited by 1,387
Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics
Piketty, T. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2946692 · Cited by 1,337
Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis
Bénabou, R., & Ok, E. A. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530151144078 · Cited by 1,227
Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution
Fong, C. M. (2001) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00141-9 · Cited by 1,120
Beliefs About Inequality: American's Views of What Is and What Ought To Be
Alwin, D. F., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1987) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2071506 · Cited by 960
Inequality in America: what role for human capital policies?
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6647 · Cited by 740
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2017) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2100 · Cited by 43
Heiserman, N., Simpson, B., & Willer, R. (2020) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023120959547 · Cited by 44
Reference points and redistributive preferences: Experimental evidence
Charité, J., Fisman, R. J., Kuziemko, I., & Zhang, K. (2022) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104761 · Cited by 41
Political Action in the Age of High‐Economic Inequality: A Multilevel Approach
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., & McKee, S. E. (2017) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12032 · Cited by 45
Welfare spending and political conflict in Latin America, 1970–2010
Justino, P., & Martorano, B. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.005 · Cited by 44
Economic Issues Are Moral Issues: The Moral Underpinnings of the Desire to Reduce Wealth Inequality
Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550618772821 · Cited by 41
Browman, A. S., Destin, M., & Miele, D. B. (2021) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12481 · Cited by 39
Is higher inequality less legitimate? Depends on How You Frame it!
Bruckmüller, S., Reese, G., & Martiny, S. E. (2017) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12202 · Cited by 38
Hoyt, C. L., Moss, A. J., Burnette, J. L., Schieffelin, A., & Goethals, A. (2017) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2289 · Cited by 38
Folk economics and its role in Trump’s presidential campaign: an exploratory study
Swedberg, R. (2018) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-018-9308-8 · Cited by 38
Deciding Who Gets What, Fairly
Shaddy, F., & Shah, A. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy029 · Cited by 38
Frank, D. H., Wertenbroch, K., & Maddux, W. W. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.04.001 · Cited by 38
Social-class differences in self-concept clarity and their implications for well-being
Na, J., Chan, M. Y., Lodi‐Smith, J., & Park, D. C. (2016) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105316643597 · Cited by 43
Becker, B. (2020) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-019-00343-7 · Cited by 37
Wisman, J. D. (2013) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.2753/jei0021-3624470406 · Cited by 37
Mayer, A., & Smith, E. K. (2016) · Social Currents · doi:10.1177/2329496516670185 · Cited by 37
Decent living standards, prosperity, and excessive consumption in the Lorenz curve
Pauliuk, S. (2024) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108161 · Cited by 31
Yardsticks of inequality: Preferences for redistribution in advanced democracies
Kevins, A., Horn, A., Jensen, C., & van Kersbergen, K. (2018) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928717753579 · Cited by 36
García‐Castro, J. D., González, R., Frigolett, C., Jiménez‐Moya, G., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2022) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2021.2006126 · Cited by 35
Perceptions of inequality and social mobility in Mexico
Campos-Vázquez, R. M., Krozer, A., Ramírez-Álvarez, A. A., de la Torre, R., & Vélez-Grajales, R. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105778 · Cited by 40
Du, H., Liang, Y., Chi, P., & King, R. B. (2021) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12771 · Cited by 36
Your Place in the World: Relative Income and Global Inequality
Fehr, D., Möllerström, J., & Truglia, R. N. P. (2022) · American Economic Journal Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20200343 · Cited by 35
Bak, H., & Yi, Y. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21369 · Cited by 34
ECONOMIC FREEDOM & HAPPINESS INEQUALITY: FRIENDS OR FOES?
Bennett, D., & Nikolaev, B. (2016) · Contemporary Economic Policy · doi:10.1111/coep.12190 · Cited by 34
The Distributional Preferences of Americans
Fisman, R. J., Jakiela, P., & Kariv, S. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20145 · Cited by 34
Your Place in the World: Relative Income and Global Inequality
Fehr, D., Möllerström, J., & Truglia, R. N. P. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26555 · Cited by 34
Corporate social responsibility and the executive-employee pay disparity
D’Mello, R., Kwon, S., & Toscano, F. (2024) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107154 · Cited by 33
A psychology of power that is embedded in societal structures
Kraus, M. W., & Torrez, B. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.018 · Cited by 35
Economic inequality and socioeconomic ranking inform attitudes toward redistribution
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., & McKee, S. E. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104180 · Cited by 33
The developmental origins and behavioral consequences of attributions for inequality
Gonzalez, A. M., Macchia, L., & Whillans, A. V. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104329 · Cited by 33
The economic inequality as normative information model (EINIM)
Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Á., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2023) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2022.2160555 · Cited by 33
Social-Class Differences in Consumer Choices
Na, J., McDonough, I. M., Chan, M. Y., & Park, D. C. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216634043 · Cited by 37
Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
Hauser, O., Kraft‐Todd, G., Rand, D. G., Nowak, M. A., & Norton, M. I. (2019) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2019.4 · Cited by 33
Self-citationHanel, P. H. P., Wolfradt, U., Maio, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.002 · Cited by 32
An Evaluation of Common Explanations for the Impact of Income Inequality on Life Satisfaction
Schalembier, B. (2018) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-018-9970-6 · Cited by 32
The social psychology of economic inequality
Easterbrook, M. J. (2021) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2021/981-5 · Cited by 32
Jung, Y. (2015) · The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society · doi:10.1080/10632921.2015.1103672 · Cited by 32
Beyond a Minimum Threshold: The Right to Social Equality
MacNaughton, G. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139235600.014 · Cited by 31
Anderson, J., Stuart, A., & Rossen, I. (2015) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajpy.12085 · Cited by 31
American’s desire for less wealth inequality does not depend on how you ask them
Norton, M. I., & Dan Ariely, C. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006069 · Cited by 31
Self-citationIncome Inequality Reduces Civic Honesty
Du, H., Chen, A., Chi, P., & King, R. B. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620929495 · Cited by 31
Buchel, O., Luijkx, R., & Achterberg, P. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12707 · Cited by 31
Koo, H. J., Piff, P. K., & Shariff, A. (2022) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506221098921 · Cited by 31
The empirical evidence against neoclassical utility theory: a review of the literature
Karaçuka, M., & Zaman, A. (2012) · International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education · doi:10.1504/ijpee.2012.052695 · Cited by 31
An evolutionary contractualist theory of moralityPreprint
André, J., Fitouchi, L., Debove, S., & Baumard, N. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2hxgu · Cited by 37
Fatke, M. (2018) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc8040099 · Cited by 30
Laurin, K., Engstrom, H. R., & Alic, A. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618788875 · Cited by 34
The Inequality of Politics: Social Class Rank and Political ParticipationPreprint
Kraus, M. W., Anderson, C. P., & Callaghan, B. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2600107 · Cited by 32
Du, H., Huang, Y., Ma, L., Chen, X., Chi, P., & King, R. B. (2023) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12467 · Cited by 34
Yu, K., Zhang, Y., Zou, H., & Wang, C. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16142597 · Cited by 29
Redistributive preferences: Why actual income is ultimately more important than perceived income
Weisstanner, D., & Armingeon, K. (2021) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/09589287211037912 · Cited by 28
Castillo, J. C., García‐Castro, J. D., & Venegas, M. (2022) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1080/02134748.2021.2009275 · Cited by 28
Marinucci, M., Riva, P., Lenzi, M., Lasagna, C., Waldeck, D., Tyndall, I. T., & Volpato, C. (2023) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12657 · Cited by 32
Luccasen, R. A., Thomas, M. K., & Grossman, P. J. (2017) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-017-1070-8 · Cited by 28
Post-extractivismo: entre el discurso y la praxis. Algunas reflexiones gruesas para la acción
Acosta, A. (2016) · Ciencia Política · doi:10.15446/cp.v11n21.60297 · Cited by 28
Herrmann, S. D., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022118761107 · Cited by 30
A Sociological Approach to Health Determinants
Schofield, T. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316178713 · Cited by 28
Rosenfeld, D. L., Balcetis, E., Bastian, B. B., Berkman, E. T., Bosson, J. K., Brannon, T. N., Burrow, A. L., Cameron, D., Chen, S., Cook, J. E., et al. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6gjfm · Cited by 31
Weiss, D. J., Greve, W., & Kunzmann, U. (2022) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/01650254221089615 · Cited by 27
Perceptions and preferences for redistribution
Stantcheva, S. (2023) · Oxford Open Economics · doi:10.1093/ooec/odad038 · Cited by 27
Do inequalities predict fear of crime? Empirical evidence from Mexico
Clément, M., & Piaser, L. (2020) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105354 · Cited by 27
Nadler, J., Day, M. V., Beshai, S., & Mishra, S. (2020) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2020.39.10.897 · Cited by 29
Temporal discounting mediates the relationship between socio-economic status and social trust
Guillou, L., Grandin, A., & Chevallier, C. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.202104 · Cited by 27
Inequality: A Matter of Justice?
Hegtvedt, K. A., & Isom, D. A. (2014) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4_4 · Cited by 28
Moral Psychological Perspectives on Distributive Justice and Societal Inequalities
Arsenio, W. F. (2015) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12115 · Cited by 27
Socioeconomic Inequality and Giftedness: Suppression and Distortion of High Ability
Ambrose, D. (2013) · Roeper Review · doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.766960 · Cited by 27
Mistry, R. S., Nenadal, L., Griffin, K. M., Zimmerman, F. J., Cochran, H. A., Thomas, C., & Wilson, C. D. (2016) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12193 · Cited by 31
The Misperception of Racial Economic InequalityPreprint
Kraus, M. W., Onyeador, I. N., Daumeyer, N. M., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zu3bq · Cited by 30
Fewer but poorer: Benevolent partiality in prosocial preferences
Paolacci, G., & Williams, G. Y. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007324 · Cited by 26
Hanna, R., & Karlan, D. (2017) · Handbook of economic field experiments · doi:10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.07.002 · Cited by 31
Health inequity in workers of Latin America and the Caribbean
Silva-Peñaherrera, M., López-Ruiz, M., Merino-Salazar, P., Gómez-García, A. R., & Benavides, F. G. (2020) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-020-01228-x · Cited by 26
Choi, G. (2021) · The Journal of Economic Inequality · doi:10.1007/s10888-020-09471-6 · Cited by 26
Toolis, E. E. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13137256 · Cited by 27
Americans Misperceive Racial Disparities in Economic Mobility
Davidai, S., & Walker, J. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211024115 · Cited by 28
Guardino, M. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.001.0001 · Cited by 26
Casara, B. G. S., Filippi, S., Suitner, C., Dollani, E., & Maass, A. (2022) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12555 · Cited by 26
Are fairness perceptions shaped by income inequality? evidence from Latin America
Reyes, G., & Gasparini, L. (2022) · The Journal of Economic Inequality · doi:10.1007/s10888-022-09526-w · Cited by 26
Heterogeneity in background fitness acts as a suppressor of selection
Hauser, O., Traulsen, A., & Nowak, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.10.013 · Cited by 27
Why do we overestimate others’ willingness to pay?
Matthews, W. J., Gheorghiu, A. I., & Callan, M. J. (2016) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007567 · Cited by 26
Paulus, M., & Essler, S. (2020) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2020.100933 · Cited by 30
Cullen, Z. N. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31060 · Cited by 26
Political distrust: the seed and fruit of popular empowerment
Zeineddine, F. B., & Pratto, F. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139565417.010 · Cited by 25
Goubin, S., Hooghe, M., Okolikj, M., & Stiers, D. (2020) · Comparative European Politics · doi:10.1057/s41295-020-00209-2 · Cited by 25
García‐Sánchez, E., Castillo, J. C., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2022) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2022.773378 · Cited by 32
Are Progressives in Denial About Progress? Yes, but So Is Almost Everyone Else
Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2022) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026221114315 · Cited by 25
The Wealth of Nations: International Judgments Regarding Actual and Ideal Resource Distributions
Arsenio, W. F. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721418762377 · Cited by 25
Framing, Context, and the Misperception of Black–White Wealth Inequality
Kraus, M. W., Hudson, S. T. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211020910 · Cited by 25
Lee, D., Chang, C. Y., & Hur, H. (2021) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-021-00371-2 · Cited by 26
Norton, M. I. (2013) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2013.794689 · Cited by 25
Self-citationChild Welfare as Justice: Why Are We Not Effectively Addressing Inequalities?
Davidson, G., Bunting, L., Bywaters, P., Featherstone, B., & McCartan, C. J. (2017) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx094 · Cited by 25
Coppini, D., Alvarez, G., & Rojas, H. (2018) · International journal of communication · Cited by 24
People from lower social classes elicit greater prosociality: Compassion and deservingness matter
Doesum, N. J. V., Lange, P. A. M. V., Tybur, J. M., Leal, A. L., & van Dijk, E. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220982072 · Cited by 24
The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality
Wisman, J. D. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197575949.001.0001 · Cited by 24
Mobility Optimism in an Age of Rising Inequality
Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (2020) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1080/00380253.2020.1756520 · Cited by 25
Eriksson, K., & Simpson, B. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006070 · Cited by 24
Wai, J., Anderson, S. M., Perina, K., Worrell, F. C., & Chabris, C. F. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03547-8 · Cited by 25
Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., & Horberg, E. J. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316225608.012 · Cited by 25
Zhao, Q., Ma, R., Liu, Z., Wang, T., Sun, X., van Prooijen, J., Dong, M., & Yuan, Y. (2023) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12695 · Cited by 23
Social class and policy preferences: implications for economic inequality and interclass relations
Bullock, H. E. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.021 · Cited by 23
Cooley, E., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Boudreau, C. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619829062 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Norton, Michael I.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-12
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2133875312
- Cited by
- 1,119
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 161.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Issues and Policies
- Keywords
- wealth inequality, public opinion on inequality, partisanship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review