The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time
Abstract
Disagreements about the optimal level of wealth inequality underlie policy debates ranging from taxation to welfare. We attempt to insert the desires of "regular" Americans into these debates, by asking a nationally representative online panel to estimate the current distribution of wealth in the United States and to "build a better America" by constructing distributions with their ideal level of inequality. First, respondents dramatically underestimated the current level of wealth inequality. Second, respondents constructed ideal wealth distributions that were far more equitable than even their erroneously low estimates of the actual distribution. Most important from a policy perspective, we observed a surprising level of consensus: All demographic groups-even those not usually associated with wealth redistribution such as Republicans and the wealthy-desired a more equal distribution of wealth than the status quo.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Using the same measure, another study found that both groups are about equally divided in their beliefs and ideals about income inequality (Norton and Ariely, 2011).”
From Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans: source or epiphenomenon of ideological and affective polarization? (2024) · cites this paper as Norton and Ariely, 2011
In the citing paper
“their preferred distribution of wealth among citizens was closer to equality than even their own incorrect estimations of the distribution”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Norton and Ariely (2011)
In the citing paper
“respondents greatly underestimated the degree of wealth inequality in the United States, believing that the wealthiest 20% of the population owned 59% of the wealth, where the actual figure is 84%”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Norton and Ariely (2011)
In the citing paper
“This also held for wealthy respondents and Republican voters – albeit to a lesser extent than their poorer and Democrat counterparts.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Norton and Ariely (2011)
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Polarized America: the dance of ideology and unequal riches
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-3551 · Cited by 1,793
Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G.-M. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828054825655 · Cited by 1,521
The spirit level: why greater equality makes societies stronger
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5973 · Cited by 1,387
Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics
Piketty, T. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2946692 · Cited by 1,337
Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis
Bénabou, R., & Ok, E. A. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530151144078 · Cited by 1,227
Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution
Fong, C. M. (2001) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00141-9 · Cited by 1,120
Beliefs About Inequality: American's Views of What Is and What Ought To Be
Alwin, D. F., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1987) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2071506 · Cited by 960
Inequality in America: what role for human capital policies?
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6647 · Cited by 740
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Working class conservatism: a system justification perspective
Jost, J. T. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.020 · Cited by 95
Hoy, C., & Mager, F. (2021) · American Economic Journal Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20190276 · Cited by 83
Lichtenberg, J. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139049290 · Cited by 83
Perceptions of U.S. Social Mobility Are Divided (and Distorted) Along Ideological Lines
Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614566657 · Cited by 92
Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality
Waldfogel, H. B., Sheehy-Skeffington, J. A., Hauser, O., Ho, A. K., & Kteily, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2023985118 · Cited by 91
Amis, J., Brickson, S., Haack, P., & Hernandez, M. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2021.0222 · Cited by 80
Hierarchy, Dominance, and Deliberation
Berkel, L. D. V., Crandall, C. S., Eidelman, S., & Blanchar, J. C. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215591961 · Cited by 86
Gründler, K., & Köllner, S. (2016) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2016.10.007 · Cited by 78
How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments
Kuziemko, I., Norton, M. I., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2013) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w18865 · Cited by 78
Self-citationDurkheim on Social Justice: The Argument from “Organic Solidarity”
Herzog, L. M. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305541700048x · Cited by 76
Power, S. A. (2018) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/700679 · Cited by 76
Do people care if men don't care about caring? The asymmetry in support for changing gender roles
Block, K., Croft, A., Souza, L. D., & Schmader, T. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.013 · Cited by 91
Socioeconomic status, time preferences and pro-environmentalism
Grandin, A., Guillou, L., Sater, R. A., Foucault, M., & Chevallier, C. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101720 · Cited by 76
Norton, M. I., Neal, D. T., Govan, C. L., Ariely, D., & Holland, E. (2014) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12058 · Cited by 59
Self-citationWhen Is Inequality Fair? An Experiment on the Effect of Procedural Justice and Agency
Akbaş, M., Dan Ariely, C., & Yüksel, S. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.014 · Cited by 81
Methodological developments in US state-level Genuine Progress Indicators: Toward GPI 2.0
Bagstad, K. J., Berik, G., & Gaddis, E. J. B. (2014) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.005 · Cited by 75
Misperceptions of income distributions: cross-country evidence from a randomized survey experiment
Bublitz, E. (2020) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwaa025 · Cited by 75
Entertaining Beliefs in Economic Mobility
Kim, E. (2022) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12702 · Cited by 87
Du, H., & King, R. B. (2021) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12468 · Cited by 74
Is Income Inequality Related to Tolerance for Inequality?
Schröder, M. (2016) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-016-0276-8 · Cited by 73
Misinterpreting Others and the Fragility of Social Learning
Frick, M., Iijima, R., & Ishii, Y. (2020) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta16981 · Cited by 73
Budging beliefs, nudging behaviour
Hauser, O., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2018) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-019-00200-9 · Cited by 71
Self-citationThe Deterioration of Democratic Political Culture: Consequences of the Perception of Inequality
Loveless, M. (2013) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0198-7 · Cited by 71
Noblesse Oblige? Social Status and Economic Inequality Maintenance among Politicians
Kraus, M. W., & Callaghan, B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085293 · Cited by 74
Li, W., Yang, Y., Wu, J., & Kou, Y. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219893997 · Cited by 73
How does Inequality Hamper Subjective Well-being? The Role of Fairness
Uğur, Z. B. (2021) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02711-w · Cited by 78
Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Á., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez‐Bailón, R. (2017) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12437 · Cited by 77
Misperceptions of Relative Affluence and Support for International Redistribution
Nair, G. (2018) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/696991 · Cited by 68
Inequality aversion in income, health, and income-related health
Hurley, J., Mentzakis, E., & Walli-Attaei, M. (2020) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102276 · Cited by 67
Higher Inequality Increases the Gap in the Perceived Merit of the Rich and Poor
Heiserman, N., & Simpson, B. (2017) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272517711919 · Cited by 66
Kameda, T., Inukai, K., Higuchi, S., Ogawa, A., Kim, H., Matsuda, T., & Sakagami, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602641113 · Cited by 68
Trust in Government and the American Public’s Responsiveness to Rising Inequality
Macdonald, D. (2019) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912919856110 · Cited by 65
Jachimowicz, J., Szászi, B., Lukas, M., Smerdon, D., Prabhu, J. C., & Weber, E. U. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0849-2 · Cited by 64
How Economic Inequality Shapes Thought and Action
Goya‐Tocchetto, D., & Payne, B. K. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1277 · Cited by 70
“Equality Theory” as a Counterbalance to Equity Theory in Human Resource Management
Morand, D. A., & Merriman, K. K. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1435-y · Cited by 69
Arsenio, W. F., & Willems, C. (2017) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000263 · Cited by 67
Rosenfeld, D. L., Balcetis, E., Bastian, B. B., Berkman, E. T., Bosson, J. K., Brannon, T. N., Burrow, A. L., Cameron, C. D., Chen, S., Cook, J., et al. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691621999374 · Cited by 68
Mijs, J. J. B., & Hoy, C. (2020) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa059 · Cited by 62
‘Fair’ inequality, consumption and climate mitigation
Millward-Hopkins, J., & Oswald, Y. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abe14f · Cited by 65
Social Class Competence Stereotypes Are Amplified by Socially Signaled Economic Inequality
Connor, P., Varney, J., Keltner, D. J., & Chen, S. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220916640 · Cited by 61
Alsamawi, A., Murray, J., Lenzen, M., Moran, D. D., & Kanemoto, K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110881 · Cited by 60
Subjective beliefs about the income distribution and preferences for redistribution
Page, L., & Goldstein, D. G. (2016) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-015-0945-9 · Cited by 59
García‐Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., García‐Castro, J. D., Sañudo, J. E. P., Polo-Vargas, J. D., & Pérez, É. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660 · Cited by 59
How should we think about Americans’ beliefs about economic mobility?
Davidai, S., & Gilovich, T. D. (2018) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007737 · Cited by 64
Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., & Tungodden, B. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2879358 · Cited by 61
The Intersection and Accumulation of Racial and Gender Inequality: Black Women's Wealth Trajectories
Brown, T. H. (2011) · The Review of Black Political Economy · doi:10.1007/s12114-011-9100-8 · Cited by 60
Vezzoli, M., Valtorta, R. R., Mari, S., Durante, F., & Volpato, C. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12928 · Cited by 63
Behind the veil of ignorance: Self-serving bias in climate change negotiations
Kriss, P. H., Loewenstein, G. F., Wang, X. S., & Weber, R. A. (2011) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002643 · Cited by 57
Perceived income inequality increases status seeking among low social class individuals
Du, H., Chen, A., Li, Y., Ma, L., Xing, Q., & Nie, Y. (2021) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12455 · Cited by 63
The Perception of Inequality of Opportunity in Europe
Brunori, P. (2016) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/roiw.12259 · Cited by 56
Is increasing inequality harmful? Experimental evidence
Fehr, D. (2017) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2017.11.001 · Cited by 56
Katić, I., & Ingram, P. L. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650317701226 · Cited by 56
The individual (mis-)perception of wage inequality: measurement, correlates and implications
Kühn, A. (2019) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-019-01722-4 · Cited by 56
I Perceive Therefore I Demand: The Formation of Inequality Perceptions and Demand for Redistribution
Bussolo, M., Ada Ferrer-i-carbonell, A., Giolbas, A., & Torre, I. (2021) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/roiw.12497 · Cited by 55
Bobzien, L. (2019) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928719879282 · Cited by 55
Inequality and redistribution behavior in a give-or-take game
Bechtel, M. M., Liesch, R., & Scheve, K. F. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1720457115 · Cited by 55
Fisman, R. J., Kuziemko, I., & Vannutelli, S. (2020) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvaa033 · Cited by 55
The Media’s Role in America’s Exceptional Politics of Inequality
Bell, C. V., & Entman, R. M. (2011) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161211417334 · Cited by 54
Attitudes Toward Economic Inequality: The Illusory Agreement
Pedersen, R. T., & Mutz, D. C. (2019) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.18 · Cited by 54
JUSTICE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF KNOWLEDGE
Kurtulmuş, F., & Irzık, G. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2015.65 · Cited by 54
García‐Sánchez, E., Correia, I. F., Pereira, C. R., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., & Vala, J. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211002366 · Cited by 62
Waste management: How reducing partiality can promote efficient resource allocation.
Choshen‐Hillel, S., Shaw, A., & Caruso, E. M. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000028 · Cited by 55
Who sees an hourglass? Assessing citizens’ perception of local economic inequality
Newman, B. J., Shah, S., & Lauterbach, E. (2018) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168018793974 · Cited by 58
The Signal Value of Crowdfunded Products
Acar, O. A., Dahl, D. W., Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2021) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437211012451 · Cited by 54
Hansen, K. J. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000582 · Cited by 51
Legitimacy Moderates the Relation Between Perceived and Ideal Economic Inequalities
Willis, G. B., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., López‐Rodríguez, L., & García‐Sánchez, E. (2015) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-015-0253-7 · Cited by 51
Callaghan, B., Harouni, L., Dupree, C. H., Kraus, M. W., & Richeson, J. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2108875118 · Cited by 54
How living in economically unequal societies shapes our minds and our social lives
Peters, K., & Jetten, J. (2023) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12632 · Cited by 58
García‐Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., Sañudo, J. E. P., Polo-Vargas, J. D., & Pérez, É. R. (2018) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-018-0317-6 · Cited by 50
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Cooley, E., McKee, S. E., & Hyden, C. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.11.006 · Cited by 50
System Justification Enhances Life Satisfaction of High- and Low-Status People in China
Li, W., Wu, J., & Kou, Y. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619866182 · Cited by 50
Latin American Middle Classes: The Distance between Perception and Reality
Lora, E. A., & Fajardo-González, J. (2013) · Economía · doi:10.1353/eco.2013.a523452 · Cited by 51
Phillips, L. T., Tepper, S. J., Goya‐Tocchetto, D., Davidai, S., Ordabayeva, N., Mirza, M. U., Szászi, B., Day, M. V., Hauser, O., & Jachimowicz, J. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683251352048 · Cited by 65
Reference Points and Redistributive Preferences: Experimental Evidence
Charité, J., Fisman, R. J., & Kuziemko, I. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21009 · Cited by 50
Koechlin, T. (2013) · Challenge · doi:10.2753/0577-5132560201 · Cited by 49
Inequality and Social Rank: Income Increases Buy More Life Satisfaction in More Equal Countries
Quispe-Torreblanca, E. G., Brown, G. D. A., Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., & Jan-emmanuel De Neve, A. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220923853 · Cited by 47
Measuring Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Justice: An Empirical Assessment
Heiserman, N., & Simpson, B. (2021) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-021-00368-x · Cited by 47
Kirman, A. P. (2016) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.54.2.534 · Cited by 47
How Unequal Is the United States? Adolescents’ Images of Social Stratification
Flanagan, C. A., & Kornbluh, M. (2019) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12954 · Cited by 46
Moral Expansiveness Around the World: The Role of Societal Factors Across 36 Countries
Kirkland, K., Crimston, C. R., Jetten, J., Rudnev, M., Acevedo-Triana, C. A., Amiot, C. E., Ausmees, L., Baguma, P., Barry, O., Becker, M., et al. (2022) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506221101767 · Cited by 45
Income Inequality and Political Trust: Do Fairness Perceptions Matter?
Bobzien, L. (2023) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-023-03168-9 · Cited by 45
Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems
Pinsof, D., Sears, D. O., & Haselton, M. G. (2023) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2023.2274433 · Cited by 49
Underestimation of personal carbon footprint inequality in four diverse countries
Nielsen, K. S., Bauer, J. M., Debnath, R., Emogor, C. A., Geiger, S. M., Ghai, S., Gwozdz, W., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2024) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-024-02130-y · Cited by 45
Sengupta, N. K., Greaves, L. M., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2017) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12192 · Cited by 45
The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication
Wiwad, D., Mercier, B., Maraun, M. D., Robinson, A. R., Piff, P. K., Aknin, L. B., & Shariff, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218685 · Cited by 45
Inequality and the erosion of trust among the poor: experimental evidence
Gallego, A. (2016) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mww010 · Cited by 44
Intergenerational Mobility and Support for Redistribution
Alesina, A., Stantcheva, S., & Teso, E. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23027 · Cited by 46
Du, H., Götz, F. M., King, R. B., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2022) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12758 · Cited by 45
Children's and adults' understanding of punishment and the criminal justice system
Dunlea, J. P., & Heiphetz, L. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103913 · Cited by 46
Lergetporer, P., Werner, K., & Woessmann, L. (2018) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104226 · Cited by 43
Economic Inequality and U.S. Public Policy Mood Across Space and Time
Johnston, C. D., & Newman, B. J. (2015) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x15588361 · Cited by 43
Beware of the ‘Bad Guys’: Economic Inequality, Perceived Competition, and Social Vigilance
Cheng, L., Hao, M., & Wang, F. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.497 · Cited by 43
Procedural Justice Shapes Evaluations of Income Inequality: Commentary on Norton and Ariely (2011)
Tyler, T. R. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393981 · Cited by 43
Using the Veil of Ignorance to align AI systems with principles of justice
Weidinger, L., McKee, K. R., Everett, R., Huang, S., Zhu, T., Chadwick, M. J., Summerfield, C., & Gabriel, I. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2213709120 · Cited by 52
How do perceived changes in inequality affect health?
Gugushvili, A., Reeves, A., & Jarosz, E. (2019) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102276 · Cited by 42
Hamilton, K. E., & Hepburn, C. J. (2014) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru010 · Cited by 42
You May Think You’re Right … Young Adults Are More Liberal Than They Realize
Zell, E., & Bernstein, M. J. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550613492825 · Cited by 47
Gimpelson, V. E., & Treisman, D. S. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21174 · Cited by 42
High-Status Exemplars and the Misperception of the Asian-White Wealth Gap
Kuo, E. E., Kraus, M. W., & Richeson, J. A. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619867940 · Cited by 41
Implications of the Biocultural Ethic for Earth Stewardship
Rozzi, R. (2015) · Ecology and ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12133-8_9 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Norton, Michael I.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-12
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2133875312
- Cited by
- 1,119
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 161.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Issues and Policies
- Keywords
- wealth inequality, public opinion on inequality, partisanship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review