The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?
Open accessAbstract
Researchers are often confused about what can be inferred from significance tests. One problem occurs when people apply Bayesian intuitions to significance testing—two approaches that must be firmly separated. This article presents some common situations in which the approaches come to different conclusions; you can see where your intuitions initially lie. The situations include multiple testing, deciding when to stop running participants, and when a theory was thought of relative to finding out results. The interpretation of nonsignificant results has also been persistently problematic in a way that Bayesian inference can clarify. The Bayesian and orthodox approaches are placed in the context of different notions of rationality, and I accuse myself and others as having been irrational in the way we have been using statistics on a key notion of rationality. The reader is shown how to apply Bayesian inference in practice, using free online software, to allow more coherent inferences from data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In terms of statistics, a Bayesian approach might be more appropriate than Fisherian statistics [56] as the Fisher approach is not appropriate with limited data [48].”
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
Probability theory the logic of science
Jaynes, E. T., & Bretthorst, G. L. (2003) · Cited by 4,600
Probability Theory: The Logic of Science
Jaynes, E. T. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790423 · Cited by 4,045
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688 · cited 3×
“For a p value, if the null is true, any value in the interval 0 to 1 is equally likely no matter how much data you collect (Rouder et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodVannieuwenhoven, N. (2020) · McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvw1d7dg.9 · Cited by 3,370
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers
Lakatos, I. (1978) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621123 · Cited by 3,045
Alexander, P. F. (1963) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1963.tb00798.x · Cited by 2,859
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230 · Cited by 2,736
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M. I.-C., & Burrows, L. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.230 · Cited by 2,646
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194105 · Cited by 2,490 · cited 1×
“For this reason, sooner or later, you are guaranteed to get a significant result if you run subjects long enough and stop when you get the p value you want (e.g., Wagenmakers, 2007).”
BackgroundHARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known
Kerr, N. L. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 · Cited by 1,989
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Blume J. D., Handbook of the philosophy of statistics
- Jeffreys H., 1961, The theory of probability
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
Dienes, Z. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781 · Cited by 1,998
“…with orthodox statistics, unless pre-specified as possible by one’s stopping rule (Armitage et al., 1969); by contrast, with Bayes, one can always collect more participants until the data are sensitive enough, that is, B < 1/3 or B > 3; see e.g., Berger and Wolpert (1988), Dienes (2008, 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP
Wagenmakers, E., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., boutin, B., et al. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7 · Cited by 1,788
“…(i.e., Bayesian model averaging in regression, Clyde, 2016), the informative model comparison approach (e.g., Gu, Mulder, Decovi´c, & Hoijtink, 2014; Gu, 2016; Mulder, 2014, 2016), and a more flexible and subjective prior specification approach (e.g., Dienes, 2011, 2014, 2016; Gronau et al., 2017).”
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications
Wagenmakers, E., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., et al. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3 · Cited by 1,767
Bayesian estimation supersedes the t-test
Kruschke, J. K. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0029146 · Cited by 1,530
“Dienes (2008, 2011) provided another analytical solution, with a corresponding online calculator.”
BackgroundMethod(2013) · Cited by 1,351
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Landis, S. C., Amara, S. G., Asadullah, K., Austin, C. P., Blumenstein, R., Bradley, E. W., Crystal, R. G., Darnell, R. B., Ferrante, R. J., Fillit, H., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11556 · Cited by 1,196
What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors
Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014) · The Journal of Problem Solving · doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1167 · Cited by 1,101
“, Edwards, Lindman, & Savage, 1963), and recently there has been a growing movement towards alternative analyses that overcome some of the shortcomings of null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and the associated p-values (Dienes, 2011; Gallistel, 2009; Johnson, 2013; Nuzzo, 2014).”
BackgroundAn Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612463078 · Cited by 1,042
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests
Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611406923 · Cited by 945
“The measure takes the form of an odds ratio: It is the probability of the data under one hypothesis relative to that under another (Dienes, 2011; Kass & Raftery, 1995; Lee & Wagenmakers, 2005).”
BackgroundBayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y · Cited by 810
“It is important to note that, in contrast to NHST, the inference drawn from the actual data set is entirely independent from the planning stage (Berger & Wolpert, 1988; Wagenmakers et al., 2014; Dienes, 2011).”
MethodMorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis
Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0 · Cited by 701
“…analysis of posterior probabilities for H 0 versus H 1 is poised to emerge as a widely used alternative to NHST in psychological research (e.g., Dienes, 2011; Kruschke, 2011; Masson, 2011; Raftery, 1995; Wagenmakers, 2007; Wetzels et al., 2011; see also Dixon, 2003; Glover & Dixon, 2004, for…”
MethodThe fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals
Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8 · Cited by 577
“scope of this paper; see Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey, and Iverson (2009), Wagenmakers, Lee, Lodewyckx, and Iverson (2008), or Dienes (2011) for accessible accounts.”
BackgroundSequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences.
Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2015) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000061 · Cited by 599
Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide
Kievit, R. A., Frankenhuis, W. E., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513 · Cited by 542
“Bayesian techniques that quantify the proportional evidence for or against independence or clustering (e.g., computing a Bayes factor, e.g., Dienes, 2011) can also be used for this purpose. null hypothesis that men and women were equally likely to be admitted is not tenable, with more men than…”
Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison
Kruschke, J. K. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611406925 · Cited by 488
“For an overview of corrections for multiple comparisons in NHST, see Maxwell and Delaney (2004, chapter 5), and for a discussion of contrasting intuitions in multiple testing, see Dienes (2011).”
Kruschke, J. K., Aguinis, H., & Joo, H. (2012) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112457829 · Cited by 478
“Because research design and scientific reasoning make the sampling and testing intentions irrelevant, a researcher’s intuitions about data analysis match Bayesian interpretation, not frequentism (Dienes, 2011).”
BackgroundImproving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist.
Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000065 · Cited by 448
“Second, many scholars prefer Bayesian statistics because they believe population parameters should be viewed as random (see, e.g., Dienes, 2011; van de Schoot et al., 2011).”
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals
Hoekstra, R., Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3 · Cited by 425
“It has been suggested that the common misinterpretations of NHST arise in part because its results are erroneously given a Bayesian interpretation, such as when the pvalue is misinterpreted as the probability that the null hypothesis is true (e.g., Cohen, 1994; Dienes, 2011; Falk & Greenbaum, 1995).”
BackgroundIntroduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving
Körber, M., Baseler, E., & Bengler, K. (2018) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006 · Cited by 418
Bayesian data analysis for newcomers
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1 · Cited by 439
“edu/bayesfactor and by Dienes at http://tinyurl.com/DienesBayesFactor.10 Downloadable software for Bayes factors in the R language is available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/ index.html, authored by Morey, Rouder, & Jamil. A package for frequentist and Bayesian analyses with pull-down menus, ca…”
MethodInfluentialQuintana, D. S., & Williams, D. R. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4 · Cited by 451
“Unlike classical inferential frameworks, Bayesian inference can incorporate such prior knowledge [17].”
BackgroundHow Bayes factors change scientific practice
Dienes, Z. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003 · Cited by 365
“The paradoxes mean that inferential outcome depends on more than the actual data obtained, and may depend on things which are in practice unknowable (the intentions and thoughts of experimenters; see Dienes, 2011 for explanation).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationAddressing the theory crisis in psychology
Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2 · Cited by 462
“These priors should depend on how strongly each hypothesis follows from a theory, and not on how many hypotheses a researcher plans to test in the same data set (Dienes, 2011).”
BackgroundThe self-consistency model of subjective confidence.
Koriat, A. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0025648 · Cited by 355
Bayesian tests to quantify the result of a replication attempt.
Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0036731 · Cited by 287
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108993647.010 · Cited by 279
Statistical methods for linguistic research: Foundational Ideas—Part II
Nicenboim, B., & Vasishth, S. (2016) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12207 · Cited by 285
Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2017) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405629.2016.1259614 · Cited by 267
Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning
Vadillo, M. A., Konstantinidis, E., & Shanks, D. R. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0892-6 · Cited by 255
“Appendix 1”
BackgroundChevallier, C., Parish‐Morris, J., McVey, A., Rump, K. M., Sasson, N. J., Herrington, J. D., & Schultz, R. T. (2015) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1479 · Cited by 256
“…is considered to provide substantial evidence against the null, a BF of less than 1/3 is considered to provide substantial evidence in favor of the null, and a BF in between 1/3 and 3 indicates data insensitivity [see Dienes, 2008, 2011, for explanations of Bayes Factors and free online software].”
BackgroundPriming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon
Shanks, D. R., Newell, B. R., Lee, E. H., Balakrishnan, D., Ekelund, L., Cenac, Z., Kavvadia, F., & Moore, C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056515 · Cited by 263
“In response to these concerns, Bayesian approaches have been developed which regard the experimental and null hypotheses as on an identical footing in terms of their ability to be evidentially supported or disconfirmed and which, of particular importance, allow one to evaluate evidence for the null hypothesis from a g…”
BackgroundTen common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript
Makin, T. R., & Orban de Xivry, J.-J. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.48175 · Cited by 238
“Moreover, there is usually more than one way to solve each of these mistakes: for example, we focus on frequentist parametric statistics in our solutions, but there are often Bayesian solutions that we do not discuss (Dienes, 2011; Etz and Vandekerckhove, 2016).”
BackgroundAgile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world
Hekler, E. B., Klasnja, P., Riley, W. T., Buman, M. P., Huberty, J., Rivera, D. E., & Martin, C. A. (2016) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-016-0395-7 · Cited by 208
“In terms of statistics, a Bayesian approach might be more appropriate than Fisherian statistics [56] as the Fisher approach is not appropriate with limited data [48].”
MethodRigorous Large-Scale Educational RCTs Are Often Uninformative: Should We Be Concerned?
Lortie-Forgues, H., & Inglis, M. (2019) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x19832850 · Cited by 234
“Bayes Factor For each trial we calculated a Bayes factor, following the method suggested by Dienes, Coulton and Heather (2017). This quantified how likely the data were under the null hypothesis compared to the alternative hypothesis, which was defined to be an effect size taken from a half normal distribution with me…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMotor contributions to the temporal precision of auditory attention
Morillon, B., Schroeder, C. E., & Wyart, V. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6255 · Cited by 242
“…statistics are usually not considered in terms of thresholds, it is generally assumed that a Bayes Factor below 1/3 corresponds to substantial evidence in favour of the ‘null’ hypothesis, whereas a Bayes Factor above 3 corresponds to substantial evidence in favour of the ‘effect’ hypothesis 57 .”
Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology
Francis, G. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0322-y · Cited by 243
D. Chambers, C., 1 Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, S. O. P., Feredoes, E., D. Muthukumaraswamy, S., & J. Etchells, P. (2014) · AIMS Neuroscience · doi:10.3934/neuroscience.2014.1.4 · Cited by 213
The Pace of Technologic Change
Patrick, K., Hekler, E. B., Estrin, D., Mohr, D. C., Riper, H., Crane, D., Godino, J., & Riley, W. T. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001 · Cited by 169
“The accumulation of knowledge includes both discovery and confirmation, and thus the Bayesian style of statistics may become more useful than frequentist or null hypothesis statistical testing approaches.(23,51) A Bayesian approach, by design, supports incremental model building via the use of “priors” knowledge.”
MethodStatistical treatment of looking-time data.
Csibra, G., Hernik, M., Mascaro, O., Tatone, D., & Lengyel, M. (2016) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000083 · Cited by 213
“While the method of expanding the sample size until a desirable effect is found (“preferential stopping”) would invalidate conventional “frequentists” statistical analyses, it is permissible with Bayesian analysis (Dienes, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialde Groot, A. D. (2014) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001 · Cited by 165
Nalborczyk, L., Batailler, C., Lœvenbruck, H., Vilain, A., & Bürkner, P. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2018_jslhr-s-18-0006 · Cited by 183
Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration
Hardwicke, T. E., & Wagenmakers, E. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01497-2 · Cited by 205
Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review
Sterzer, P., Stein, T., Ludwig, K., Rothkirch, M., & Hesselmann, G. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00453 · Cited by 167
“In that case the test just has no result, that is, the evidence is not sufficient to support a conclusion(Dienes,2011).”
BackgroundThe Replication Crisis Has Led to Positive Structural, Procedural, and Community Changes
Korbmacher, M., Azevedo, F., Pennington, C. R., Hartmann, H., Pownall, M., Schmidt, K., Elsherif, M., Breznau, N., Robertson, O., Kalandadze, T., et al. (2023) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2 · Cited by 137
“In this context, equivalence testing 111 or Bayesian analyses 112 have been proposed as suitable approaches to directly assess evidence for the alternative hypothesis against evidence for the null hypothesis 113 .”
MethodTesting Equivalence in Communication Research: Theory and Application
Weber, R., & Popova, L. (2012) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.703834 · Cited by 135
“…recent publications in the field of Psychology suggest using a Bayesian approach, and particularly a Bayes Factor Analysis, for the test of alternative theoretical models that may include a null-model, i.e., a model that predicts effects that are inconsequential on practical grounds (Dienes, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodThe representational dynamics of visual objects in rapid serial visual processing streams
Grootswagers, T., Robinson, A. K., & Carlson, T. A. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.046 · Cited by 136
“Statistical inference In this study, we used Bayes factors (Dienes, 2011; Jeffreys, 1998; Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey, & Iverson, 2009; Wagenmakers, 2007) to determine the evidence for the null and alternative hypotheses.”
MethodGroundwater vulnerability assessment: A review including new statistical and hybrid methods
Taghavi, N., Niven, R. K., Paull, D. J., & Kramer, M. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153486 · Cited by 132
Default “Gunel and Dickey” Bayes factors for contingency tables
Jamil, T., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., Love, J., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0739-8 · Cited by 136
“Unfortunately, all p-value inference is plagued by the same conceptual and practical problems (e.g., Dienes, 2011; Wagenmakers, 2007; Wagenmakers, Lee, Lodewyckx, & Iverson, 2008; Wagenmakers et al., in press; Wagenmakers et al., 2016; Wagenmakers, Morey, & Lee, in press).”
BackgroundMechanisms underlying training-induced cognitive change
von Bastian, C. C., Belleville, S., Udale, R. C., Reinhartz, A., Essounni, M., & Strobach, T. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00001-3 · Cited by 147
Multisensory Integration in Complete Unawareness: Evidence From Audiovisual Congruency Priming
Faivre, N., Mudrik, L., Schwartz, N., & Koch, C. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614547916 · Cited by 127
“…assess whether the lack of priming stemmed from insufficient sensitivity of our experimental design or from a genuine lack of effect, we computed Bayes factors (referred to as B hereafter; see Jeffreys, 1961; Dienes, 2011; 0.33 < B < 3 suggests insensitivity, and B < 0.33 implies no effect).”
MethodInfluentialDoes self-control improve with practice? Evidence from a six-week training program.
Miles, E., Sheeran, P., Baird, H. M., Macdonald, I. A., Webb, T. L., & Harris, P. R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000185 · Cited by 136
“Bayesian analyses allow conclusions to be drawn about whether non-significant results provide conclusive support for the null hypothesis, relative to a pre-existing theory (Dienes, 2011).”
What Took Them So Long? Explaining PhD Delays among Doctoral Candidates
van de Schoot, R., Yerkes, M. A., Mouw, J. M., & Sonneveld, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068839 · Cited by 175
“Bayesian statistics are becoming more common in academic research [28].”
Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated
Genschow, O., van Den Bossche, S., Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Rigoni, D., & Brass, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183784 · Cited by 115
An Ethical Approach to Peeking at Data
Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614528214 · Cited by 121
How Bayesian statistics are needed to determine whether mental states are unconscious
Dienes, Z. P. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688890.003.0012 · Cited by 111
Self-citationReplicability Crisis in Social Psychology: Looking at the Past to Find New Pathways for the Future
Świątkowski, W., & Dompnier, B. (2017) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.66 · Cited by 132
“…neither evidence for nor against the null hypothesis, and even when the latter is true, the p-value can take almost any value ( Cumming, 2012; Dienes, 2011).4 Thus, even when a theory lacks empirical support and when failed attempts at replication accumulate, it is still hardly possible to…”
BackgroundHow to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list
Etz, A. J., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., Edelsbrunner, P. A., & Baribault, B. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5 · Cited by 120
“A natural follow-up to our third highlighted source (Dienes, 2011).”
InfluentialAn Appeal for a Methodological Fusion of Conversation Analysis and Experimental Psychology
de Ruiter, J. P., & Albert, S. (2017) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351813.2017.1262050 · Cited by 119
“Alternative paradigms such as Bayesian statistics (see, e.g., Dienes, 2011; Wagenmakers, 2007) in combination with a higher threshold for the minimal amount of required evidence (e.g., Etz & Vandekerckhove, 2016) would largely remedy this problem but are still controversial because of the…”
BackgroundUnderstanding hypnosis metacognitively: rTMS applied to left DLPFC increases hypnotic suggestibility
Dienes, Z., & Hutton, S. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.07.009 · Cited by 106
“Notice the 95% CI includes a 6% difference, so in fact nothing follows from the non-significant result: It is as consistent with there being a relevant effect as with there being none.2 2 Non-significant results can also usefully be interpreted with Bayes Factors (Dienes, 2008, 2011).”
Self-citationCategorical encoding of color in the brain
Bird, C. M., Berens, S. C., Horner, A. J., & Franklin, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1315275111 · Cited by 104
“75 would indicate a weak effect (32, 33)], and a Bayes factor in support of the null hypothesis over 3 indicates substantial support for the null (32).”
BackgroundIs There a Free Lunch in Inference?
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, J., Province, J. M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12214 · Cited by 111
Lin, H.-Y., Tseng, W.-Y. I., Lai, M.-C., Matsuo, K., & Gau, S. S.-F. (2015) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561771500020x · Cited by 102
“The probability of our hypothesis being true given the observations (data) on these connectivity-behavior correlations was tested by a Bayesian approach (Dienes, 2008, 2011).”
MethodKujala, J., Jung, J., Bouvard, S., Lecaignard, F., Lothe, A., Bouet, R., Ciumas, C., Ryvlin, P., & Jerbi, K. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16347 · Cited by 108
Adams, R. C., Lawrence, N., Verbruggen, F., & Chambers, C. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.014 · Cited by 105
Resting GABA and glutamate concentrations do not predict visual gamma frequency or amplitude
Cousijn, H., Haegens, S., Wallis, G., Near, J., Stokes, M. G., Harrison, P. J., & Nobre, A. C. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1321072111 · Cited by 113
“3 is seen as providing evidence in favor of the null hypothesis and a BF >3 as strong evidence against it (17).”
BackgroundMethodNieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E., & van Rijn, H. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003144 · Cited by 105
“One approach that offers an elegant means to do so is the computation of a Bayes factor (e.g., Dienes, 2008; Dienes, 2011; Jeffreys, 1961; Morey & Rouder, 5 Assuming an effect size d = .218, as found by Strick et al. (2011) in their meta-analysis, the power for the statistical test of this…”
Subliminal understanding of negation: Unconscious control by subliminal processing of word pairs
Armstrong, A.-M., & Dienes, Z. P. (2013) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.06.010 · Cited by 97
Self-citationUnconscious avoidance of eye contact in autism spectrum disorder
Madipakkam, A. R., Rothkirch, M., Dziobek, I., & Sterzer, P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13945-5 · Cited by 106
Kopiske, K. K., Bruno, N., Hesse, C., Schenk, T., & Franz, V. H. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.020 · Cited by 96
A Choice Mind-Set Increases the Acceptance and Maintenance of Wealth Inequality
Savani, K., & Rattan, A. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611434540 · Cited by 93
“Across the six studies, all Bayes factors estimated the null hypothesis against an alternative hypothesis described by a half-normal distribution, with both the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between conditions equal to 0.5 units (see Dienes, 2011, p. 287).”
InfluentialStatistical Methods for Linguistic Research: Foundational Ideas - Part I
Nicenboim, B., & Vasishth, S. (2016) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12201 · Cited by 249
Strengthening statistical usage in marine ecology
Beninger, P., Boldina, I., & Katsanevakis, S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2012.05.020 · Cited by 85
“The same process of successive strengthening of belief or factual congruency can be applied to ecological problems, and it is often far more appropriate than classical approaches (Dienes, 2011).”
BackgroundUsing priors to formalize theory: Optimal attention and the generalized context model
Vanpaemel, W., & Lee, M. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0300-4 · Cited by 138
“It is widely recognized in statistics (Gelman, Carlin, Stern &Rubin, 2004; Jaynes, 2003) and, increasingly, in psychology (Dienes, 2011; Kruschke, 2010, 2011; Lee & Wagenmakers, 2005) that the Bayesian approach offers a complete and coherent framework for making inferences using models and data.”
BackgroundPang, C., Li, W., Zhou, Y., Gao, T.-Y., & Han, S.-H. (2023) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsad008 · Cited by 101
“To further verify the null results obtained in the bootstrap analyses, we conducted the Bayes factor (BF) analysis (Dienes, 2011) to assess the likelihood of data-driven alternative hypothesis over the likelihood of data-driven null hypothesis (BF10) or the reverse (BF01) with default priors for paired t-test design (…”
MethodThe cognitive reflection test revisited: exploring the ways individuals solve the test
Szászi, B., Szollosi, A., Pálfi, B., & Aczél, B. (2017) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1292954 · Cited by 100
Savani, K., Stephens, N. M., & Markus, H. R. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611407928 · Cited by 89
Only giving orders? An experimental study of the sense of agency when giving or receiving commands
Caspar, É. A., Axel Cleeremans, B., & Haggard, P. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204027 · Cited by 88
Gucciardi, D. F., & Jackson, B. (2013) · Journal of science and medicine in sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.11.011 · Cited by 105
Neural Mechanisms of Human Perceptual Choice Under Focused and Divided Attention
Wyart, V., Myers, N. E., & Summerfield, C. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3276-14.2015 · Cited by 85
“When reporting nonsignificant differences, we complemented standard “frequentist” tests with Bayes factors to distinguish between an insensitive test (not providing evidence in favor or against the null hypothesis) and a genuine absence of difference (Dienes, 2011).”
MethodUnconscious or underpowered? Probabilistic cuing of visual attention.
Vadillo, M. A., Linssen, D., Orgaz, C. J., Parsons, S., & Shanks, D. R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000632 · Cited by 95
“…Wicherts, & van Assen, 2017), perhaps even more so, given that Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST), as regularly implemented in psychological research, is poorly suited to assess the plausibility of the null hypothesis (Dienes, 2011, 2015; Hoekstra, Finch, Kiers, & Johnson, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodPostretrieval new learning does not reliably induce human memory updating via reconsolidation
Hardwicke, T. E., Taqi, M., & Shanks, D. R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1601440113 · Cited by 90
“As the inherent limitations of null-hypothesis significance testing constrain the degree to which one can determine the strength of evidence in favor of the null hypothesis (34), we also conducted a Bayesian analysis that enabled us to quantify the evidence in favor of the null hypothesis H0 (RS = 0) relative to the r…”
MethodResearch Design in Clinical Psychology
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108993647 · Cited by 240
Poisson regression for linguists: A tutorial introduction to modelling count data with brms
Winter, B., & Bürkner, P. (2021) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12439 · Cited by 98
Effect of mindfulness meditation on brain–computer interface performance
Tan, L. F., Dienes, Z. P., Jansari, A. S., & Goh, S.-Y. (2013) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.010 · Cited by 84
“evidence for the null hypothesis; and a Bayes Factor in between 1/3 and 3 indicates data insensitivity (Dienes, 2011).”
Self-citationStatistical learning leads to persistent memory: Evidence for one-year consolidation
Kóbor, A., Janacsek, K., Takács, Á., & Németh, D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00807-3 · Cited by 83
Fact learning in complex arithmetic—the role of the angular gyrus revisited
Bloechle, J., Huber, S., Bahnmueller, J., Rennig, J., Willmes, K., Cavdaroglu, S., Moeller, K., & Klein, E. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23226 · Cited by 78
“This value is above 3, which is considered to indicate substantial evidence in favor of the null hypothesis [Dienes, 2011, 2014].”
BackgroundPerforming Contrast Analysis in Factorial Designs: From NHST to Confidence Intervals and Beyond
Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M. E. (2016) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164416668950 · Cited by 87
“In Bayesian inference, credible intervals represent the combination of prior beliefs and likelihood into final beliefs (Dienes, 2011).”
BackgroundJackson, J. B., Rich, A. N., Williams, M., & Woolgar, A. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01039 · Cited by 83
“This procedure was repeated until there was no difference in RT between the two task contexts, as assessed with Bayes factor (BF) analysis (Love et al., 2015) in each participant separately (BF < 1 taken as evidence for no difference between conditions; Dienes 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEnvironmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation
Keinath, A. T., Julian, J. B., Epstein, R. A., & Muzzio, I. A. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.046 · Cited by 75
“To further test this claim, we calculated the Bayes factor [41, 42] comparing the null hypothesis that best-match rotations were randomly distributed to the alternative hypothesis that best-match rotations were more often consistent with chamber geometry (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures).”
MethodFrom specific examples to general knowledge in language learning
Tamminen, J., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2015) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.03.003 · Cited by 79
Fiori, F., Chiappini, E., & Avenanti, A. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.002 · Cited by 74
The influence of image masking on object representations during rapid serial visual presentation
Robinson, A. K., Grootswagers, T., & Carlson, T. A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.050 · Cited by 73
Krypotos, A., Jahfari, S., van Ast, V. A., Kindt, M., & Forstmann, B. U. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00278 · Cited by 85
“to Dienes (2011), Rouder et al.”
Co-Increasing Neuronal Noise and Beta Power in the Developing BrainPreprint
He, W., Donoghue, T., Sowman, P. F., Seymour, R. A., Brock, J., Crain, S., Voytek, B., & Hillebrand, A. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/839258 · Cited by 75
“In addition, Bayes Factors (alternative BF/null BF; Wagenmakers, 2007; Dienes, 2011) were estimated in JASP v0.”
MethodRethinking statistical analysis methods for CHI
Kaptein, M. C., & Robertson, J. (2012) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208557 · Cited by 72
“Critics of the traditional statistical inference method of significance testing argue that “it is time for researchers to consider foundational issues in inference” [10, p.274].”
MethodYoris, A., Abrevaya, S., Esteves, S., Salamone, P., Lori, N., Martorell, M., Legaz, A., Alifano, F., Petroni, A., Sánchez, R., et al. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23933 · Cited by 66
“We performed Bayes tests for all results yielding non-significant differences (Dienes, 2011, 2014; Dienes, Coulton, & Heather, 2017; Dienes & Mclatchie, 2017).”
MethodThe elusive nature of the blocking effect: 15 failures to replicate.
Maes, E., Boddez, Y., Alfei, J. M., Krypotos, A., D’Hooge, R., Houwer, J. D., & Beckers, T. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000200 · Cited by 80
“A BF quantifies the relative probability of the data under, e.g., the null versus the alternative hypothesis (Dienes, 2011; Gallistel, 2009; Morey, 2015; Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey, & Iverson, 2009).”
BackgroundThe P600 as a correlate of ventral attention network reorientation
Sassenhagen, J., & Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, I. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.019 · Cited by 68
Confidence in masked orientation judgments is informed by both evidence and visibility
Rausch, M., Hellmann, S., & Zehetleitner, M. (2017) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1431-5 · Cited by 74
“Group-level statisticsAll statistical analysis at the group level was based on Bayesian statistics (Dienes, 2011; Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey, & Iverson, 2009; Wetzels et al., 2011) using the R library BayesFactor (Morey & Rouder, 2014).”
MethodNovel procedure for generating continuous flash suppression: Seurat meets Mondrian
Cha, O., Son, G., Chong, S. C., Tovar, D. A., & Blake, R. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.14.1 · Cited by 71
“…govern our sample size, knowing that the Bayes factor becomes progressively smaller with increasing sample size in cases where the null hypothesis becomes more and more likely than one’s alternative hypothesis (Dienes, 2011; Rouder, 2014; Schönbrodt, Wagenmakers, Zehetleitner, & Perugini, 2017).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Dienes, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dienes, Zoltan
- ORCID
- Dienes, Zoltan
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 274-290
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2055754299
- Cited by
- 938
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- Bayesian inference, significance testing, null hypothesis significance testing, multiple comparisons, stopping rules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review