The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Much (More) Should CEOs Make? A Universal Desire for More Equal Pay
Open accessAbstract
Do people from different countries and different backgrounds have similar preferences for how much more the rich should earn than the poor? Using survey data from 40 countries ( N = 55,238), we compare respondents’ estimates of the wages of people in different occupations—chief executive officers, cabinet ministers, and unskilled workers—to their ideals for what those wages should be. We show that ideal pay gaps between skilled and unskilled workers are significantly smaller than estimated pay gaps and that there is consensus across countries, socioeconomic status, and political beliefs. Moreover, data from 16 countries reveals that people dramatically underestimate actual pay inequality. In the United States—where underestimation was particularly pronounced—the actual pay ratio of CEOs to unskilled workers (354:1) far exceeded the estimated ratio (30:1), which in turn far exceeded the ideal ratio (7:1). In sum, respondents underestimate actual pay gaps, and their ideal pay gaps are even further from reality than those underestimates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“American respondents underestimated the actual difference in income between CEOs and unskilled workers (354:1)”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Kiatpongsan & Norton, 2014
In the citing paper
“their preferences regarding this difference (7:1) were more egalitarian than were their estimates (30:1).”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Kiatpongsan & Norton, 2014
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time
Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393524 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationAnalyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyPreprint
Aberson, C. L. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j2zbe · Cited by 104
The social maximum: American attitudes toward extremely high incomes
Burak, E. (2012) · Research in Social Stratification and Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2012.11.003 · Cited by 18
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- International Labour Organization, 2013, Global Wage Report 2012/13
- Mishel L., 2013, CEO pay in 2012 was extraordinarily high relative to typical workers and other high earners
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831
“It is alsoworth noting that similar findings have been reported in a study of preferences for income inequality (Kiatpongsan & Norton, 2014), where it was found that American respondents underestimated the actual difference in income between CEOs and unskilled workers (354:1), and that their…”
ResultWhy people prefer unequal societies
Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0082 · Cited by 556
(Mis)perceptions of inequality
Hauser, O., & Norton, M. I. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.024 · Cited by 332
Self-citationSigns of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life
Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. X. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616673192 · Cited by 288
Americans misperceive racial economic equality
Kraus, M. W., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707719114 · Cited by 218
Income Mobility Breeds Tolerance for Income Inequality: Cross-National and Experimental Evidence
Shariff, A. F., Wiwad, D., & Aknin, L. B. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616635596 · Cited by 202
Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression: A test of the theory of social deprivation.
Greitemeyer, T., & Sagioglou, C. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000058 · Cited by 202
How Much Does Your Boss Make? The Effects of Salary Comparisons
Cullen, Z. N., & Truglia, R. N. P. (2021) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/717891 · Cited by 176
Davidai, S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.012 · Cited by 190
Unpacking the Inequality Paradox: The Psychological Roots of Inequality and Social Class
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. J. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.10.002 · Cited by 181
Folk-economic beliefs: An evolutionary cognitive model
Boyer, P., & Petersen, M. B. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x17001960 · Cited by 137
Sznycer, D., Seal, M. F. L., Sell, A. N., Lim, J., Porat, R., Shalvi, S., Halperin, E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1703801114 · Cited by 142
Progressive taxation, income inequality, and happiness.
Oishi, S., Kushlev, K., & Schimmack, U. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000166 · Cited by 135
A Big Tent of Dark Personality Traits
Marcus, D. K., & Zeigler‐Hill, V. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12185 · Cited by 129
Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality
García‐Sánchez, E., Osborne, D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez‐Bailón, R. (2019) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12326 · Cited by 132
Jachimowicz, J., Davidai, S., Goya‐Tocchetto, D., Szászi, B., Day, M. V., Tepper, S. J., Phillips, L. T., Mirza, M. U., Ordabayeva, N., & Hauser, O. (2022) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12507 · Cited by 107
Inequality can double the energy required to secure universal decent living
Millward-Hopkins, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32729-8 · Cited by 95
Froehlich, L., Olsson, M. I. T., Dorrough, A. R., & Martiny, S. E. (2020) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12390 · Cited by 98
Power, S. A. (2018) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/700679 · Cited by 76
Budging beliefs, nudging behaviour
Hauser, O., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2018) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-019-00200-9 · Cited by 71
Self-citationConsumers Avoid Buying From Firms With Higher CEO ‐to‐Worker Pay Ratios
Mohan, B., Schlager, T., Deshpandé, R., & Norton, M. I. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1033 · Cited by 70
Self-citationInequality aversion in income, health, and income-related health
Hurley, J., Mentzakis, E., & Walli-Attaei, M. (2020) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102276 · Cited by 67
‘Fair’ inequality, consumption and climate mitigation
Millward-Hopkins, J., & Oswald, Y. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abe14f · Cited by 65
High CEO-to-worker pay ratios negatively impact consumer and employee perceptions of companies
Benedetti, A. H., & Chen, S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.003 · Cited by 60
How does Inequality Hamper Subjective Well-being? The Role of Fairness
Uğur, Z. B. (2021) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02711-w · Cited by 78
Landry, A. T., Kindlein, J., Trépanier, S., Forest, J., Zigarmi, D., Houson, D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2016) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-015-9532-8 · Cited by 74
How should we think about Americans’ beliefs about economic mobility?
Davidai, S., & Gilovich, T. D. (2018) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007737 · Cited by 64
García‐Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., García‐Castro, J. D., Sañudo, J. E. P., Polo-Vargas, J. D., & Pérez, É. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660 · Cited by 59
Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., & Tungodden, B. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2879358 · Cited by 61
Reducing global inequality to secure human wellbeing and climate safety: a modelling study
Millward-Hopkins, J., & Oswald, Y. (2023) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(23)00004-9 · Cited by 67
McGregor, T., Smith, B., & Wills, S. (2019) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grz015 · Cited by 64
Katić, I., & Ingram, P. L. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650317701226 · Cited by 56
Attitudes Toward Economic Inequality: The Illusory Agreement
Pedersen, R. T., & Mutz, D. C. (2019) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.18 · Cited by 54
How Economic Inequality Shapes Thought and Action
Goya‐Tocchetto, D., & Payne, B. K. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1277 · Cited by 70
Legitimacy Moderates the Relation Between Perceived and Ideal Economic Inequalities
Willis, G. B., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., López‐Rodríguez, L., & García‐Sánchez, E. (2015) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-015-0253-7 · Cited by 51
The Realities and Futures of Work
Peetz, D. (2019) · ANU Press eBooks · doi:10.22459/rfw.2019 · Cited by 51
How living in economically unequal societies shapes our minds and our social lives
Peters, K., & Jetten, J. (2023) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12632 · Cited by 58
García‐Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., Sañudo, J. E. P., Polo-Vargas, J. D., & Pérez, É. R. (2018) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-018-0317-6 · Cited by 50
Measuring Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Justice: An Empirical Assessment
Heiserman, N., & Simpson, B. (2021) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-021-00368-x · Cited by 47
Economic Inequality and U.S. Public Policy Mood Across Space and Time
Johnston, C. D., & Newman, B. J. (2015) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x15588361 · Cited by 43
Inequality in People's MindsPreprint
Phillips, L. T., Tepper, S. J., Goya‐Tocchetto, D., Davidai, S., Ordabayeva, N., Mirza, M. U., Szászi, B., Day, M. V., Hauser, O., & Jachimowicz, J. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vawh9 · Cited by 44
Income inequality is unrelated to perceived inequality and support for redistribution
Trump, K. (2023) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13269 · Cited by 43
The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication
Wiwad, D., Mercier, B., Maraun, M. D., Robinson, A. R., Piff, P. K., Aknin, L. B., & Shariff, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218685 · Cited by 45
High-Status Exemplars and the Misperception of the Asian-White Wealth Gap
Kuo, E. E., Kraus, M. W., & Richeson, J. A. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619867940 · Cited by 41
Gimpelson, V. E., & Treisman, D. S. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21174 · Cited by 42
Browman, A. S., Destin, M., & Miele, D. B. (2021) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12481 · Cited by 39
Understanding and mitigating cynicism in the workplace
Scott, K. A., & Zweig, D. (2016) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-01-2015-0023 · Cited by 38
Is higher inequality less legitimate? Depends on How You Frame it!
Bruckmüller, S., Reese, G., & Martiny, S. E. (2017) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12202 · Cited by 38
Economic Issues Are Moral Issues: The Moral Underpinnings of the Desire to Reduce Wealth Inequality
Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550618772821 · Cited by 41
A Matter of Perspective: How Failure Shapes Distributive Preferences
Cassar, L., & Klein, A. H. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3185 · Cited by 38
Heiserman, N., Simpson, B., & Willer, R. (2020) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023120959547 · Cited by 44
How Much Does Your Boss Make? The Effects of Salary Comparisons
Cullen, Z. N., & Truglia, R. N. P. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24841 · Cited by 34
Lynch, J. F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139051576 · Cited by 44
Folk economics and its role in Trump’s presidential campaign: an exploratory study
Swedberg, R. (2018) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-018-9308-8 · Cited by 38
Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
Hauser, O., Kraft‐Todd, G., Rand, D. G., Nowak, M. A., & Norton, M. I. (2019) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2019.4 · Cited by 33
Self-citationA psychology of power that is embedded in societal structures
Kraus, M. W., & Torrez, B. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.018 · Cited by 35
Rekker, R., & Harteveld, E. (2024) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-022-00265-4 · Cited by 32
The influence of CEO compensation on employee engagement
Hendriks, M., Burger, M., & Commandeur, H. R. (2022) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-022-00538-4 · Cited by 32
The social psychology of economic inequality
Easterbrook, M. J. (2021) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2021/981-5 · Cited by 32
Corporate social responsibility and the executive-employee pay disparity
D’Mello, R., Kwon, S., & Toscano, F. (2024) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107154 · Cited by 33
Laurin, K., Engstrom, H. R., & Alic, A. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618788875 · Cited by 34
Yu, K., Zhang, Y., Zou, H., & Wang, C. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16142597 · Cited by 29
An evolutionary contractualist theory of moralityPreprint
André, J., Fitouchi, L., Debove, S., & Baumard, N. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2hxgu · Cited by 37
Fewer but poorer: Benevolent partiality in prosocial preferences
Paolacci, G., & Williams, G. Y. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007324 · Cited by 26
Framing, Context, and the Misperception of Black–White Wealth Inequality
Kraus, M. W., Hudson, S. T. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211020910 · Cited by 25
Poverty Research and Measurement: Making the Case for Consumption Adequacy
Farrell, J. R., & Hill, R. P. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12183 · Cited by 27
Decent living standards, prosperity, and excessive consumption in the Lorenz curve
Pauliuk, S. (2024) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108161 · Cited by 31
Paulus, M., & Essler, S. (2020) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2020.100933 · Cited by 30
Digital Capitalism and Distributive Forces
Pfeiffer, S. (2022) · Xtexte · doi:10.1515/9783839458938 · Cited by 40
Tenhiälä, A., & Laamanen, T. M. M. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2953 · Cited by 24
Cullen, Z. N. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31060 · Cited by 26
Norton, M. I. (2014) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732214550167 · Cited by 20
Self-citationThe redistributive consequences of segregation and misperceptions
Windsteiger, L. (2022) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104073 · Cited by 23
Meindl, P., Iyer, R., & Graham, J. (2019) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1663524 · Cited by 25
Distributing less, redistributing more: Safe and just low-energy futures in the United Kingdom
Millward-Hopkins, J., & Johnson, E. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102915 · Cited by 22
Perceived Inequality and Cross-National Homicide Rates
Rogers, M. L., & Pridemore, W. A. (2020) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2020.1729392 · Cited by 19
García‐Sánchez, E., García‐Castro, J. D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez‐Bailón, R. (2024) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231221310 · Cited by 18
CEO-to-employee pay ratio and CEO diversity
Alan, N. S., Bardos, K. S., & Shelkova, N. Y. (2020) · Managerial Finance · doi:10.1108/mf-03-2020-0107 · Cited by 18
Gobel, M. S., & Carvacho, H. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12875 · Cited by 28
Critical Management Studies in the South African context
A. Goldman, G. (2016) · doi:10.4102/aosis.2016.cmssac08 · Cited by 18
Corporate Sustainability and CEO–Employee Pay Gap—Buster or Booster?
Pascual, F. G.-B., Przychodzeń, W., & Przychodzeń, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11216023 · Cited by 18
Understanding subjective inequality in China
Song, X. (2022) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcac047 · Cited by 17
How Segregation Ruins Inference: A Sociological Simulation of the Inequality Equilibrium
Mijs, J. J. B., & Usmani, A. (2024) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soae033 · Cited by 20
Too Much Redistribution, Too Little or Just Right?
Reiersen, J. (2021) · Forum for Social Economics · doi:10.1080/07360932.2021.2011763 · Cited by 16
Cultural psychology of inequality: Current and future directions
Oishi, S., Bak, H., & Caluori, N. (2022) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12516 · Cited by 19
García‐Sánchez, E., Castillo, J. C., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2022) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2022.773378 · Cited by 32
When CEO Pay Becomes a Brand Problem
Besharat, A., Whitler, K. A., & Kashmiri, S. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05394-0 · Cited by 19
Hitlin, S., & Andersson, M. A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197743867.001.0001 · Cited by 16
Syrovátka, M., & Schlossárek, M. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.032 · Cited by 15
Summers, K., Accominotti, F., Burchardt, T., Hecht, K., Mann, E., & Mijs, J. J. B. (2022) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-022-00389-0 · Cited by 17
Contingencies in the effects of job‐based pay dispersion on employee attitudes
Tenhiälä, A., Kepes, S., & Jokela, M. M. (2023) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22183 · Cited by 16
Low Awareness of Occupational Segregation and the Gender Pay Gap: No Changes Over a 16-year Span
Beyer, S. (2016) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9521-4 · Cited by 15
Paying Up for Fair Pay: Consumers Prefer Firms with Lower CEO-to-Worker Pay RatiosPreprint
Mohan, B., Norton, M. I., & Deshpandé, R. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2611289 · Cited by 14
Self-citationEconomic Inequality Shapes Judgments of Consumption
Hagerty, S. F., Barasz, K., & Norton, M. I. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1275 · Cited by 14
Self-citationThe Political Psychology of Inequality
Osborne, D., Becker, J. C., Bahamondes, J., & García‐Sánchez, E. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.026 · Cited by 13
Filippi, S., Casara, B. G. S., Peters, K., Maass, A., Feraco, T., & Suitner, C. (2024) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2024.2415127 · Cited by 14
Shaping Tomorrow’s Workplace by Integrating Self-Determination Theory
Forest, J., Dubord, M. G., Olafsen, A. H., & Carpentier, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197600047.013.45 · Cited by 14
Temporal change in inequality perceptions and effects on political attitudes
Becker, B. (2020) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2020.1860652 · Cited by 15
Keppeler, F., & Papenfuß, U. (2021) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1942531 · Cited by 13
Mattan, B. D., Barth, D. M., Thompson, A., FeldmanHall, O., Cloutier, J., & Kubota, J. T. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232369 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiatpongsan, S., & Norton, M. I.
- Affiliations
- Chulalongkorn University (TH)
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Norton, Michael I.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 587-593
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2039675961
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 51.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- wage inequality, CEO compensation, wage gap, occupational pay, cabinet ministers, low-skilled workers, cross-national comparison, political beliefs, socioeconomic status
- MeSH terms
- Commerce, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Humans, Income, Political Systems, Politics, United States, Models, Economic, Internationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review