Cited by 540Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decentering and Related Constructs: A Critical Review and Metacognitive Processes Model

Open access

Abstract

The capacity to shift experiential perspective—from within one’s subjective experience onto that experience—is fundamental to being human. Scholars have long theorized that this metacognitive capacity—which we refer to as decentering—may play an important role in mental health. To help illuminate this mental phenomenon and its links to mental health, we critically examine decentering-related constructs and their respective literatures (e.g., self-distanced perspective, cognitive distancing, cognitive defusion). First, we introduce a novel metacognitive processes model of decentering. Specifically, we propose that, to varying degrees, decentering-related constructs reflect a common mental phenomenon subserved by three interrelated metacognitive processes: meta-awareness, disidentification from internal experience, and reduced reactivity to thought content. Second, we examine extant research linking decentering-related constructs and their underlying metacognitive processes to mental health. We conclude by proposing future directions for research that transcends decentering-related constructs in an effort to advance the field’s understanding of this facet of human experience and its role in (mal)adaptation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691615594577

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 134 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Anālayo B., 2003, Satipatthāna: The direct path to realization
  2. Foody M., 2013, International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 13, 373
  3. Goleman D., 1980, Beyond ego, 141
  4. Luciano C., 2011, International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11, 165
  5. Moore R. G., Hayhurst H., Teasdale J. D. (1996). Measure of Awareness and Coping in Autobiographical Memory: Instructions for administering and coding. Unpublished manuscript. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  6. Sakairi Y., 2004, The relevance of the wisdom traditions in contemporary society: The challenge to psychology, 199
  7. Thanissaro B., 1996, The wings to awakening
  8. Wells A., 2000, Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 540

Metadata

Authors
Bernstein, A., Hadash, Y., Lichtash, Y., Tanay, G., Shepherd, K., & Fresco, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bernstein, Amit
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2015-09
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
599-617
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2337549616
Cited by
539
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 2
FWCI
38.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL119977)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
decentering, metacognition, cognitive distancing, cognitive defusion, meta-awareness, mental health
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Humans, Mental Health, Models, Psychological, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review