The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is Basic about Basic Emotions? Lasting Lessons from Affective Neuroscience
Abstract
A cross-species affective neuroscience strategy for understanding the primary-process (basic) emotions is defended. The need for analyzing the brain and mind in terms of evolutionary stratification of functions into at least primary (instinctual), secondary (learned), and tertiary (thought-related) processes is advanced. When viewed in this context, the contentious battles between basic-emotion theorists and dimensional-constructivist approaches can be seen to be largely nonsubstantial differences among investigators working at different levels of analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind
Searle, J. R. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173452 · Cited by 4,575
Barrett, L. F. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x · Cited by 1,859
Affective consciousness: core emotional feelings in animals and humans.
Panksepp, J. (2005) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.004 · Cited by 1,217
Self-citationDeep Brain Stimulation to Reward Circuitry Alleviates Anhedonia in Refractory Major Depression
Schlaepfer, T. E., Cohen, M. X., Frick, C., Kosel, M., Brodesser, D., Axmacher, N., Joe, A. Y., Kreft, M., Lenartz, D., & Sturm, V. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301408 · Cited by 1,027
Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions
Panksepp, J. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00012759 · Cited by 999
depue, R. A., & morrone-strupinsky, J. V. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000063 · Cited by 958
The archaeology of mind: neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-3555 · Cited by 794
Self-citationNelson, E. E., & Panksepp, J. (1998) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00052-3 · Cited by 688
Cited by
The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000446 · Cited by 2,320
“In modern times, this approach has become known as the basic emotion approach (e.g., Ekman 1972; 1992; Ekman & Cordaro 2011; Izard 1977; 1990; 2011; Lewis 2005; Panksepp 1998; 2007; Panksepp & Watt 2011; Tracy et al. 2010) or the natural kind approach (cf. Barrett 2006a).”
InfluentialSiegel, E. H., Sands, M. K., Van den Noortgate, W., Condon, P., Chang, Y., Dy, J., Quigley, K. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000128 · Cited by 515
Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0027555 · Cited by 503
On the importance of both dimensional and discrete models of emotion
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Summerell, E. (2017) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs7040066 · Cited by 201
Historical pitfalls and new directions in the neuroscience of emotion
Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2019) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.045 · Cited by 180
Distributed affective space represents multiple emotion categories across the human brain
Saarimäki, H., Ejtehadian, L. F., Glerean, E., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Vuilleumier, P., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy018 · Cited by 146
“These emotions may involve more elaborate cognitive representations acquired through experience, education, and social norms (Panksepp and Watt, 2011), and hence, recruit brain systems partly distinct from those implicated in more ‘primitive’ and possibly innate basic emotions.”
BackgroundMultivoxel pattern analysis does not provide evidence to support the existence of basic emotions
Clark-Polner, E., Johnson, T. D., & Barrett, L. F. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw028 · Cited by 97
Autonomic nervous system activity during positive emotions: a meta-analytic review
Behnke, M., Kreibig, S. D., Kaczmarek, L. D., Assink, M., & Gross, J. J. (2022) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/17540739211073084 · Cited by 60
Ferrer, R. A., Green, P. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615576755 · Cited by 58
Emotion, Wellbeing and the Neurological Disorders
Fisher, Z., Galloghly, E., Boglo, E., Gracey, F., & Kemp, A. H. (2022) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, 2nd edition · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819641-0.00013-x · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Panksepp, J., & Watt, D.
- Venue
- Emotion Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-09-20
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-396
- ISSN
- 1754-0739 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-0747
- OpenAlex
- W1975866301
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
