Cited by 20Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Processing of Emotional Information in Major Depressive Disorder: Toward a Dimensional Understanding

Open access
Kircanski, Katharina, Gotlib, Ian H.·2015·Emotion Review

Abstract

Several decades of research converge on the formulation that individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) exhibit negative biases in their processing of emotional information. It is becoming increasingly clear, however, that traditional between-group comparisons have obscured the substantial heterogeneity of cognitive and affective dysfunction that is associated with depressive symptomatology. In this article, we review the findings of research examining attention to and memory for negative emotional information using a more dimensional perspective on depression. Specifically, we explore studies that assess cognitive biases along a continuum of depressive symptom severity and consider the influence of co-occurring dimensions of functioning, in particular the severity of anxiety symptoms. Finally, we identify critical empirical questions and issues in this growing literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1754073915575402

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depressed patients' attention tends to linger longer on negative information such as sad faces than healthy controls do.

    “Generally speaking, depressed patients’ attention tends to linger longer on negative information such as sad faces than healthy controls do, which suggests a negative bias in the way that depressed individuals sample information from their environments.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [59]

  • Depressed patients tend to spend more time attending to negative information such as sad faces than neutral or positive information.

    “A large body of research, largely utilizing the Dot Probe56 or Emotional Stroop Task57 has shown that depressed patients tend to spend more time attending to negative information, such as sad faces than neutral or positive information (for review see refs. 58,59).”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [59]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ingram RE, & Siegle GJ (2009). Methodological issues in the study of depression. In Handbook of Depression (2nd ed., pp. 69– 92). New York: The Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kircanski, K., & Gotlib, I. H.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Gotlib, Ian H.
Venue
Emotion Review
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
256-264
ISSN
  • 1754-0739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-0747
OpenAlex
W2320408286
Cited by
20
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (4r01mh101495-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH101495, MH101495, MH74849, R01MH074849, F32MH096385)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, emotional processing, attentional bias, depression severity, anxiety symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review