The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories
Abstract
Conspiracy theories can form a monological belief system: A self-sustaining worldview comprised of a network of mutually supportive beliefs. The present research shows that even mutually incompatible conspiracy theories are positively correlated in endorsement. In Study 1 ( n = 137), the more participants believed that Princess Diana faked her own death, the more they believed that she was murdered. In Study 2 ( n = 102), the more participants believed that Osama Bin Laden was already dead when U.S. special forces raided his compound in Pakistan, the more they believed he is still alive. Hierarchical regression models showed that mutually incompatible conspiracy theories are positively associated because both are associated with the view that the authorities are engaged in a cover-up (Study 2). The monological nature of conspiracy belief appears to be driven not by conspiracy theories directly supporting one another but by broader beliefs supporting conspiracy theories in general.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with findings that participants who believed in one conspiracy theory were also more likely to believe in others, even when they were contradictory [42,43].”
From The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories (2020) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“the simultaneous belief in mutually contradictory theories—e.g., that Princess Diana was murdered but faked her own death—is a notable aspect of conspiracist ideation [30]”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Bruνswik, E., Levinson, D. M., & Sandford, R. N. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446220986.n8 · Cited by 6,460
Jurczak, C. A., Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707481 · Cited by 2,351
Goertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 9×
“Much of this research interest has focused on the individual correlates of conspiracy belief, but perhaps the most consistent finding in the work on the psychology of conspiracy theories is that belief in a particular theory is strongly predicted by belief in others—even ostensibly unrelated ones (Douglas & Sutton, 20…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThagard, P. R. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00057046 · Cited by 1,075
Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x · Cited by 502
Swami, V., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1583 · Cited by 499 · cited 2×
“This finding supports our contention that the monological nature of conspiracism (Goertzel, 1994; Swami et al., 2010, 2011) is driven not by conspiracy theories directly supporting one another but by the coherence of each theory with higher-order beliefs that support the idea of conspiracy in…”
BackgroundResultThe Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction.
Simon, D., Snow, C. J., & Read, S. J. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.814 · Cited by 306
Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing
Clarke, S. (2002) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004931032002001 · Cited by 303
Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning.
Read, S. J. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.288 · Cited by 301
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Coady D., 2006, Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate
- Kay J., 2011, Among the truthers: A journey through America’s conspiracist underground
- Read S. J., 2003, the Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–658 of 658
Talò, C. (2025) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70136
Revisiting the California F Scale: On the Contemporary Relevance of its Omitted FacetsPreprint
Heidemeyer, P., Sorrentino, A., Hoffmann, L., Quinten, L. K. J. L., Grozeva, N., Walther, E., & Banse, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5852469
de Novaes, A. M., & de Novaes, D. M. (2025) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy9040149
“(3) Conspiracy theories are populist, because they are founded on a critique of the elite and the glorification of popular sovereignty, with an emphasis on the belief in the deceptive nature of authorities—deceptive officialism (Wood et al. 2012, p. 768).”
Meaning-Making in Times of Trouble: COVID-19 Conspiracies on Russian Telegram
Yablokov, I., Moen-Larsen, N., & Blakkisrud, H. (2025) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2025.2591711
“Such narratives foster group cohesion and stigmatize external threats, serving as potent tools for social and political mobilization (Bertuzzi 2021; M. J. Wood, Douglas, and Sutton 2012).”
Dimensionalität und psychologische Korrelate des Glaubens an Verschwörungstheorien
Gumhalter, N. (2012) · University of Vienna · doi:10.25365/thesis.21046
Youssef, D., Bleibel, L., & Abboud, E. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26596892
Mohamed, A. E. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3341797
Truth Discernment in Conspiracy TheoriesPreprint
Yilmaz, S., & Stah, T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5967825
Stabilisieren sich verschwörungstheoretische Weltbilder bereits in der Jugend?
Imhoff, R., & Bertlich, T. (2026) · Bürgerbewusstsein · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-50019-1_3
Freemasonry-related Historical Narratives in Finnish Online Conspiracy Theories
Korpi, O., & Publishing, A. (2025) · Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review · doi:10.5840/asrr2026112134
Muasya, G., Wachira, W., & Mwangi, S. W. (2024) · African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research · doi:10.71064/spu.amjr.8.ii.2023.252
“Conspiracy theories tend to satisfy social-psychological motives such as seeking explanations for phenomena in times of uncertainty and contradictions; the desire for control and security; and maintain a positive self-image of self or a group (Douglas et al., 2019, Wood et al., 2012).”
Conspiracy as a Defense: The Role of Defensive Styles in the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories
Antichi, L., Giannini, M., Tosti, A. E., Guazzini, A., & Gursesli, M. C. (2026) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941261423092
Imhoff, R. (2026) · Edition Rechtsextremismus · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-50276-8_6
Are Conspiracy Theorists Confabulating?
Murphy‐Hollies, K. (2026) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-025-00783-y
Knowing better: conspiratorial wellness, national bodies, and global plots in Turkish popular media
Karaosmanoğlu, K. (2026) · Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies · doi:10.1080/14683857.2026.2632614
Brief and Effective: Media Literacy Tips Improve Fake News Discernment
Lorko, M., Čavojová, V., & Šrol, J. (2025) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaf067
Mascaro, O., & Kovács, Á. M. (2026) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.339
Comment on raisonne sur les explications : philosophie et psychologie du raisonnement explicatif
Mirabile, P. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/daef9c74z4dd4z4152za292zeb013ca8b625
Truth discernment in conspiracies
Yilmaz, S., & Ståhl, T. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.113803
Zhou, C. (2026) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2026.2659822
Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Validation of a French and English Single-Item ScalePreprint
Douglas, K., Lantian, A., Nurra, C., & Dominique Muller, B. (2015) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Self-citationConspiracy Mentality and Political Orientation across 26 countriesPreprint
Zimmer, F., & Imhoff, R. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
How conspiracy theories are defined: A systematic qualitative review of academic definitions
Nefes, T. S., Escobar, J. M., & González-Albo, B. (2026) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.23324.1
The Promise and Limits of the Locality Hypothesis in the Study of Beliefs
Lukić, P., Žeželj, I., Petrović, M. M., & Teovanović, P. (2026) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2026.2650211
“The most apparent example is the endorsement of mutually contradictory conspiracy theories, e.g., the one positing that Lady Dianne was assassinated by the British secret service and the one positing that she faked her own death (Wood et al., 2012).”
Knasmüller, F., & Brunner, M. (2026) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.18139
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0009
Topic Modeling and Word Embedding
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.005.0001
Linguistic Patterns in Online Conspiracy Theory
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0001
Opportunities for Future Research
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0010
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0005
From Mindsets and Algorithms to a Cultural Toolkit
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0004
Why Do Online Conspiracy Theories Matter?
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0002
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.002.0001
Online Conspiracy Theorizing as Conversational Coordination
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0008
Fake News, Rumors, Folk Theories
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0003
Online Conspiracy Rabbit Hole as a Semantic Cascade
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0006
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.002.0006
How We Studied Conspiracy Theories
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.005.0002
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.002.0007
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.001.0001
Linguistic Signature of Superspreaders
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0007
Teaching the web of rationality: a case study on coherence and conspiracy world-views
Daoust, M., & Laplante-Anfossi, M. (2026) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhag009
Conspiracy Theories as Natural Reactions to Power Asymmetry
Nuhlíček, M. (2026) · Human Affairs · doi:10.1515/humaff-2025-0094
“Those who believe, say, that bin Laden had died long before the US special forces raided his compound in Pakistan are also likely to believe that he is still alive (see Wood et al. 2012, 770 – 771).”
Akçakaya, N. (2026) · Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.32709/akusosbil.1844272
6 Şubat Depremleri ve komplo söyleminin dijital izleri: X’te #HAARP hashtag’inin söylemsel inşası
ÖZER, A. (2026) · Kayseri Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.51177/kayusosder.1750772
Democratic resilience to authoritarian disinformation: Initiating a needs-based approach
Wagnsson, C., Hoyle, A., & Petterson, A. (2026) · Contemporary Security Policy · doi:10.1080/13523260.2026.2707161 · Cited by 1
“The positive association between conspiracy mindset and greater susceptibility to Russian disinformation in this article also aligns with the well-documented tendency that people who believe one conspiracy theory also believe others (see, for example, Wood et al., 2012).”
Metag, J., & Wintterlin, F. (2026) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2026-0021
“At the personality level, a stable conspiracy mentality, that is, the generalized tendency to interpret events as the result of conspiracies, is one of the strongest predictors of belief in specific conspiracy theories (Strömbäck et al., 2024; Wood et al., 2012).”
Fortuna, A. M. D., Picione, R. D. L., & Tateo, L. (2026) · Theory and history in the human and social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26797-9_4
Flakus, M., Waszkowski, A., Plisiecki, H., Małyska, K., & Pokropek, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2026.1886614
Bertlich, T., Flade, F., & Imhoff, R. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104986
The Dunning–Kruger effect does not account for Covid-scepticism or vaccine hesitancy
McIntosh, R. D., Claydon, J., Booth, T., & Sala, S. D. (2026) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.260147
“It is well established that endorsement of one con-spiracy theory is associated with endorsement of others [47 ,52 ,53 ], and Covid-related conspiracy beliefs appear to conform to this so-called monological pattern [54 ,55 ].”
Zhang, B. (2026) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1080/03623319.2026.2742243
Erceg, N., Kunst, J. R., Kostanić, M., & Galić, Z. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7661495
Urciuoli, B., & LaDousa, C. (2026) · Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura eBooks · doi:10.21435/sfa.6
Bertero, A., Williams, M., Vegetti, F., & Mancosu, M. (2026) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.70122
Lee, A., & To, P. Y. L. (2026) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941261502288
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wood, Michael J.
- Venue
- Social Psychological and Personality Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-01-25
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 767-773
- ISSN
- 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2133598673
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 72.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, belief endorsement, cover-up, Princess Diana, Osama bin Laden, Bayesian networks, conspiracy beliefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
