Cited by 160Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEthics in Business and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking

Piazza, Jared, Sousa, Paulo·2014·Social Psychological and Personality Science

DOI 10.1177/1948550613492826

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Three studies demonstrated that the moral judgments of religious individuals and political conservatives are highly insensitive to consequentialist (i.e., outcome-based) considerations. In Study 1, both religiosity and political conservatism predicted a resistance toward consequentialist thinking concerning a range of transgressive acts, independent of other relevant dispositional factors (e.g., disgust sensitivity). Study 2 ruled out differences in welfare sensitivity as an explanation for these findings. In Study 3, religiosity and political conservatism predicted a commitment to judging “harmless” taboo violations morally impermissible, rather than discretionary, despite the lack of negative consequences rising from the act. Furthermore, non-consequentialist thinking style was shown to mediate the relationship religiosity/conservatism had with impermissibility judgments, while intuitive thinking style did not. These data provide further evidence for the influence of religious and political commitments in motivating divergent moral judgments, while highlighting a new dispositional factor, non-consequentialist thinking style, as a mediator of these effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550613492826

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Handbook of socialization theory and research
Grusec, J. E., & Hastings, P. D. (2007) · Cited by 5,003
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 2×
“These findings extend past findings by Piazza (2012). Piazza’s studies focused on religiosity and provided participants with the option of justifying their condemnation for various acts, along a continuum, by either appealing to the violation of a rule or a negative consequence. Measures of religiosity were found to u…”
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology
Haidt, J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137651 · Cited by 2,504
Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/0011526042365555 · Cited by 2,079
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613 · Cited by 1,747
Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 · Cited by 1,632

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

Greene J. D., 2008, Moral psychology: The neuroscience of morality, 35
Kant I., 1797, Practical philosophy, 611
Mill J. S., 1861, Utilitarianism
Piazza J., 2013, Because God commands it: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority explains the link between religiosity and non-consequentialist moral thinking
Russell P. S., 2012, When do deontological arguments communicate more moral conviction than consequentialist arguments?
Sinnott-Armstrong W. (2009a). Consequentialism. In Zalta E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.science.uva.nl/∼seop/archives/spr2009/entries/consequ-entialism

Sorted by citations

Beyond sacrificial harm: a two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000093 · Cited by 434
The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS)
Everett, J. A. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082131 · Cited by 452
Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection
Rutjens, B. T., Sutton, R. M., & van der Lee, R. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217741314 · Cited by 381
“Why Does the Cognitive Reflection Test (Sometimes) Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment (and Other Things)?”
Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Emlen Metz, S. (2015) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003 · Cited by 346
Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1 · Cited by 281
Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis
Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153039 · Cited by 232
Attitudes Towards Science
Rutjens, B. T., Heine, S. J., Sutton, R. M., & van Harreveld, F. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.08.001 · Cited by 163
Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology
Deppe, K. D., Gonzalez, F. J., Neiman, J. L., Jacobs, C. M., Pahlke, J., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005131 · Cited by 166
The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect
Royzman, E. B., Kim, K., & Leeman, R. F. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000512x · Cited by 143
“Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments
Piazza, J. R., & Landy, J. F. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004691 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
Public values: citizens’ perspective
Bozeman, B. L. (2018) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1529878 · Cited by 131
Moral Punishment in Everyday Life
Hofmann, W., Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., Rockenbach, B., & Skitka, L. J. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218775075 · Cited by 128
Does religion increase moral behavior?
Shariff, A. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.009 · Cited by 124
Cognitive Reflection is a Stable Trait
Stagnaro, M. N., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007695 · Cited by 116
Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218783192 · Cited by 102
Age differences in moral judgment: Older adults are more deontological than younger adults
McNair, S., Okan, Y., Hadjichristidis, C., & de Bruin, W. B. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2086 · Cited by 102
The cognitive reflection test revisited: exploring the ways individuals solve the test
Szászi, B., Szollosi, A., Pálfi, B., & Aczél, B. (2017) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1292954 · Cited by 100
Using Moral Foundations to Predict Voting Behavior: Regression Models from the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2015) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12074 · Cited by 103
An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: A non-western replication and extension
Yılmaz, O., & Sarıbay, S. A. (2016) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003119 · Cited by 88
Switching Tracks? Towards a Multidimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology
Everett, J. A. C., & Kahane, G. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.012 · Cited by 94
Dietary behaviour as a form of collective action: A social identity model of vegan activism
Judge, M., Fernando, J. W., & Begeny, C. T. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105730 · Cited by 105
Moral foundation priorities reflect U.S. Christians' individual differences in religiosity
Johnson, K. A., Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Van Tongeren, D. R., Sandage, S. J., & Crabtree, S. A. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.037 · Cited by 81
Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies
Byrd, N., & Conway, P. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.007 · Cited by 77
The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style
Bahçekapılı, H. G., & Yılmaz, O. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.013 · Cited by 73
Morality and the religious mind: why theists and nontheists differ
Shariff, A., Piazza, J. R., & Kramer, S. R. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.003 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used
Yılmaz, O., & Sarıbay, S. A. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005684 · Cited by 56
Theodiversity
Norenzayan, A. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033426 · Cited by 62
On the Relation Between Religiosity and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories: The Role of Political Orientation
Frenken, M., Bilewicz, M., & Imhoff, R. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12822 · Cited by 66
Living Slow and Being Moral
Zhu, N., Hawk, S. T., & Chang, L. (2018) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-018-9313-7 · Cited by 50
The Webs We Weave: Predicting Infidelity Motivations and Extradyadic Relationship Satisfaction
Hackathorn, J. M., & Ashdown, B. K. (2020) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2020.1746954 · Cited by 22
Act Versus Impact: Conservatives and Liberals Exhibit Different Structural Emphases in Moral Judgment
Hannikainen, I. R., Miller, R. M., & Cushman, F. A. (2017) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.12162 · Cited by 47
Reflecting on God's will: Reflective processing contributes to religious peoples' deontological dilemma responses
McPhetres, J., Conway, P. J., Hughes, J. S., & Zuckerman, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.013 · Cited by 43
Is pulling the lever sexy? Deontology as a downstream cue to long-term mate quality
Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2017) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407517749331 · Cited by 41
Religious moral righteousness over care: a review and a meta-analysis
Saroglou, V., & Craninx, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.002 · Cited by 50
Revisiting the divide between deontology and utilitarianism in moral dilemma judgment: A multinomial modeling approach.
Hennig, M., & Hütter, M. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000173 · Cited by 41
Harmful transgressions qua moral transgressions: A deflationary view
Sousa, P., & Piazza, J. R. (2013) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.834845 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
The amoral atheist? A cross-national examination of cultural, motivational, and cognitive antecedents of disbelief, and their implications for morality
Ståhl, T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246593 · Cited by 35
Is saving lives your task or God’s? Religiosity, belief in god, and moral judgment
Barak‐Corren, N., & Bazerman, M. H. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000588x · Cited by 36
Personality and moral judgment: Curious consequentialists and polite deontologists
Smillie, L. D., Katic, M., & Laham, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12598 · Cited by 43
One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test
Erceg, N., & Bubić, A. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004 · Cited by 35
Correlations of trait and state emotions with utilitarian moral judgements
Baron, J., Gürçay, B., & Luce, M. F. (2017) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2017.1295025 · Cited by 33
Rethinking fast and slow processing in autism.
Taylor, E., Farmer, G., Livingston, L. A., Callan, M. J., & Shah, P. (2022) · Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science · doi:10.1037/abn0000734 · Cited by 30
When a good god makes bad people: Testing a theory of religion and immorality.
Jackson, J. C., & Gray, K. J. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000206 · Cited by 36
The link between intuitive thinking and social conservatism is stronger in WEIRD societies
Yilmaz, O., & Alper, S. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003399 · Cited by 27
What We Talk About When We Talk About Morality: Deontological, Consequentialist, and Emotive Language Use in Justifications Across Foundation-Specific Moral Violations
Wheeler, M. A., & Laham, S. M. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216653374 · Cited by 27
The Ethical Standards of Judgment Questionnaire: Development and Validation of Independent Measures of Formalism and Consequentialism
Love, E., Salinas, T. C., & Rotman, J. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3937-8 · Cited by 30
The role of motivation in the association of political ideology with cognitive performance
Burger, A. M., Pfattheicher, S., & Jauch, M. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104124 · Cited by 28
Lower Levels of Resistance to Change (but not Opposition to Equality) Is Related to Analytic Cognitive Style
Yılmaz, O., & Sarıbay, S. A. (2018) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000328 · Cited by 26
Impact of uncertainty and ambiguous outcome phrasing on moral decision-making
Shou, Y., Olney, J., Smithson, M. J., & Song, F. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233127 · Cited by 27
Belief in divine moral authority: Validation of a shortened scale with implications for social attitudes and moral cognition
Simpson, A., Piazza, J. R., & Morrison, K. R. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.032 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Body Odor Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Moral Harshness Toward Moral Violations of Purity
Liuzza, M. T., Olofsson, J., Montecinos, S. C., & Lindholm, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00458 · Cited by 25
Disgust and Deontology: Trait Sensitivity to Contamination Promotes a Preference for Order, Hierarchy, and Rule-Based Moral Judgment
Robinson, J. S., Xu, X., & Plaks, J. E. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617732609 · Cited by 25
Deep Alignment with Country Shrinks the Moral Gap Between Conservatives and Liberals
Talaifar, S., & Swann, W. B. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12534 · Cited by 23
Political Ideology and Moral Dilemma Judgments: An Analysis Using the CNI Model
Luke, D. M., & Gawronski, B. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220987990 · Cited by 26
Do well, do good, and know your audience: the double-edged sword of values-based CSR communication
Love, E., Sekhon, T. S., & Salinas, T. C. (2022) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-022-00282-w · Cited by 26
Big Five Personality Traits and Moral-Dilemma Judgments: Two Preregistered Studies using the CNI Model
Luke, D. M., & Gawronski, B. (2022) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104297 · Cited by 24
Right-wing ideology and numeracy: A perception of greater ability, but poorer performance
Choma, B. L., Sumantry, D., & Hanoch, Y. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006100 · Cited by 20
Citizenship and morality
Baron, J. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.010 · Cited by 20
Anger and Sadness as Moral Signals
Plaks, J. E., Robinson, J. S., & Forbes, R. C. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211025909 · Cited by 19
Terminating a Child’s Life? Religious, Moral, Cognitive, and Emotional Factors Underlying Non-Acceptance of Child Euthanasia
Deak, C., & Saroglou, V. (2017) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.341 · Cited by 20
Temporal Stability of Moral Dilemma Judgments: A Longitudinal Analysis Using the CNI Model
Luke, D. M., & Gawronski, B. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211035024 · Cited by 17
Who believes in a just world? A multilevel latent profile analysis of Justice Capital using the European Social Survey
Bartholomaeus, J. D. (2024) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12947 · Cited by 17
Religiosity and the value of being moral: Understanding the meaning of morality through a personal values perspective
Sverdlik, N., & Rechter, E. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2627 · Cited by 22
RETRACTED: Declines in Religiosity Predict Increases in Violent Crime—but Not Among Countries With Relatively High Average IQ
Clark, C. J., Winegard, B., Beardslee, J., Baumeister, R. F., & Shariff, A. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619897915 · Cited by 17
Retracted
Moral decision-making among young muslim adults on harmless taboo violations: The effects of gender, religiosity, and political affiliation
Tepe, B., Piyale, Z. E., Sirin, S. R., & Rogers‐Sirin, L. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.012 · Cited by 18
Enhancing Business Schools’ Pedagogy on Sustainable Business Practices and Ethical Decision-Making
Rodenburg, K. S., & MacDonald, K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13105527 · Cited by 15
Religious and secular roads to justify wrongdoing: How values interact with culture in explaining moral disengagement attitudes
Sverdlik, N., & Rechter, E. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103981 · Cited by 17
Cognitive Reflection is a Stable TraitPreprint
Stagnaro, M. N., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3115809 · Cited by 15
Why moral advocacy leads to polarization and proselytization: The role of self-persuasion
Abeywickrama, R. S., Rhee, J. J.-S., Crone, D. L., & Laham, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1346 · Cited by 14
Moral Framing and Mechanisms Influence Public Willingness to Optimize Cognition
Haslam, M., Yaden, D. B., & Medaglia, J. D. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1007/s41465-020-00190-4 · Cited by 14
Response time modelling reveals evidence for multiple, distinct sources of moral decision caution
Andrejević, M., White, J. P., Feuerriegel, D., Laham, S. M., & Bode, S. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105026 · Cited by 16
Absolutely Right and Relatively Good: Consequentialists See Bioethical Disagreement in a Relativist Light
Viciana, H., Hannikainen, I. R., & Rodríguez‐Arias, D. (2021) · AJOB Empirical Bioethics · doi:10.1080/23294515.2021.1907476 · Cited by 14
Beyond bidimensional measures: Introducing a culturally tailored measure of political orientation
Demel, R., Pooresmaeili, A., Gagsch, F., Spengler, M., & Schacht, A. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12935 · Cited by 15
Rationalization and Reflection Differentially Modulate Prior Attitudes Toward the Purity Domain
Hannikainen, I. R., & Rosas, A. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12747 · Cited by 12
Uncovering the moral heuristics of altruism: A philosophical scale
Friedland, J., Emich, K. J., & Cole, B. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229124 · Cited by 13
Are neo-liberals more intuitive? Undetected libertarians confound the relation between analytic cognitive style and economic conservatism
Yılmaz, O., Sarıbay, S. A., & Iyer, R. (2019) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-0130-x · Cited by 11
Beyond Trolleyology: The CNI Model of Moral-Dilemma Responses
Gawronski, B., & Ng, N. L. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683241234114 · Cited by 15
How Do Age, Sex, Political Orientation, Religiosity, and Sexism Affect Perceptions of Sex Assault/Harassment Allegations?
O’Connor, K. W., Drouin, M. A., & Niedermeyer, T. (2021) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-021-09837-6 · Cited by 11
“See no evil. Feel no evil?”: Exploring emotional responses to masked moral violations in religious and nonreligious Singaporean participants.
Leong, M. Q., Yu, Z., Tsikandilakis, M., & Tong, E. M. W. (2023) · Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1037/ebs0000333 · Cited by 11
Scandalous: Christian identification, sex guilt, and the mediated demonization of the participants in the AshleyMadison scandal
Ashdown, B. K., Hackathorn, J. M., & Daniels, J. (2018) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2018.1461603 · Cited by 9
Consider the tumor: Brain tumors decrease punishment via perceptions of free will
Stinnett, A. J., & Alquist, J. L. (2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2052830 · Cited by 10
Building Religious Product Advantage to Increase Marketing Performance of Micro, Small and Medium Halal Industry in Central Java - Indonesia
Hanfan, A., Hapsari, I. M., Setiawan, A. I., & Nupus, H. (2023) · Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen · doi:10.15294/jdm.v14i2.42272 · Cited by 8
Political Orientations and Morality Judgments in the Turkish Context: Considering the Roles of the Needs for Cognition and Recognition
Tekeş, B., İmamoğlu, E. O., Özdemir, F., & Öner-Özkan, B. (2020) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294119899903 · Cited by 7
How Do Cognitive Styles Influence Political Attitudes? A Joint Consideration of Dual-Process Model and Construal Level Theory
Alper, S., Yılmaz, O., & Sarıbay, S. A. (2020) · Identity in a changing world · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38270-4_6 · Cited by 7
A 21st century cognitive portrait of the Himba, a remote people of Namibia
Trémolière, B., Davidoff, J. B., & Caparos, S. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12539 · Cited by 8
The Effects of Foreign Language and Religiosity on Moral Decisions: Manipulating Norms and Consequences
Barabadi, E., Tabar, M. R., & Booth, J. R. (2023) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340165 · Cited by 7
Intuitive and Reflective Responses in PhilosophyPreprint
Byrd, N. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2787284 · Cited by 7
Attitudes towards science
(2017) · OECD economic surveys. Austria · doi:10.1787/eco_surveys-aut-2017-graph59-en · Cited by 9
Dopamine, religiosity, and utilitarian moral judgment
Mueller, D., & Halfmann, K. (2021) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2021.1974935 · Cited by 7
Social (not fiscal) conservatism predicts deontological ethics
Chan, E. Y. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102867 · Cited by 7
Sensitivity to Moral Principles Predicts Both Deontological and Utilitarian Response Tendencies in Sacrificial Dilemmas
Bostyn, D. H., Roets, A., & Conway, P. J. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211027031 · Cited by 7
Intentionality, Morality, and the Incest Taboo in Madagascar
Sousa, P., & Swiney, L. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00494 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Moral Punishment in Everyday LifePreprint
Hofmann, W., Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., & Skitka, L. J. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qujep · Cited by 10
High and low conflict moral dilemmas resolution: comparing moral judgment from Spanish and Mexican samples
Urbina, G. N. R., Molero‐Chamizo, A., Hinojiante, H., Contreras, E. V., & Martínez-García, C. (2021) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530.2021.1882276 · Cited by 5
Religious Fundamentalism and Quest as Predictors of Moral Foundations Among Iranian Muslims
Mikani, M., & Tabatabaei, S. K. R. (2021) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/jssr.12750 · Cited by 5
The impact of visual perspective in advertising on tourist misbehavior
Meng, L. M., Pang, S., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Font, X. (2025) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105312 · Cited by 4
The effect of source reliability and information credibility on judgments of information quality in intelligence analysis
Kelly, M. O., Budescu, D. V., Dhami, M. K., & Mandel, D. R. (2025) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/jdm.2025.10007 · Cited by 5
Biblical Literalism Influences Perceptions of History as a Scientific Discipline
Oberlin, K. C., & Scheitle, C. P. (2019) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023119826425 · Cited by 4
The Interplay Between Absolute Language and Moral Reasoning on Endorsement of Moral Foundations
Blankenship, K. L., Craig, T. Y., & Machacek, M. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.569380 · Cited by 5
Using conflict negativity to index psychological tension between impartiality and status-upholding principles
Plaks, J. E., Lv, J., Zhao, M., Staples, W., & Robinson, J. S. (2021) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2021.1953133 · Cited by 4

Authors: Piazza, J., & Sousa, P.
Affiliations: University of Pennsylvania (US)
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author: Piazza, Jared
ORCID: Piazza, Jared
Sousa, Paulo
Venue: Social Psychological and Personality Science
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2013-06-13
Volume: 5
Issue: 3
Pages: 334-342
ISSN: 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
1948-5514
DOI: 10.1177/1948550613492826
OpenAlex: W2100942092
Cited by: 160
References: 40
Citations by year: 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI: 4.55
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords: religiosity, political conservatism, moral judgment, taboo violation, disgust sensitivity, intuitive thinking, moral transgression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks