The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking
Abstract
Three studies demonstrated that the moral judgments of religious individuals and political conservatives are highly insensitive to consequentialist (i.e., outcome-based) considerations. In Study 1, both religiosity and political conservatism predicted a resistance toward consequentialist thinking concerning a range of transgressive acts, independent of other relevant dispositional factors (e.g., disgust sensitivity). Study 2 ruled out differences in welfare sensitivity as an explanation for these findings. In Study 3, religiosity and political conservatism predicted a commitment to judging “harmless” taboo violations morally impermissible, rather than discretionary, despite the lack of negative consequences rising from the act. Furthermore, non-consequentialist thinking style was shown to mediate the relationship religiosity/conservatism had with impermissibility judgments, while intuitive thinking style did not. These data provide further evidence for the influence of religious and political commitments in motivating divergent moral judgments, while highlighting a new dispositional factor, non-consequentialist thinking style, as a mediator of these effects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Multiple studies suggest that religious disbelief is associated with a more consequentialist view of morality. Specifically, disbelievers are more inclined to judge the appropriateness of actions based on their consequences relative to the consequences of inaction [57–59].”
From The amoral atheist? A cross-national examination of cultural, motivational, and cognitive antecedents of disbelief, and their implications for morality (2021) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“The moral psychology literature also suggests that disbelievers are more inclined than believers to form moral judgments on the basis of the consequences of specific actions compared to inaction [57–59].”
From The amoral atheist? A cross-national examination of cultural, motivational, and cognitive antecedents of disbelief, and their implications for morality (2021) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cites
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Handbook of socialization theory and research
Grusec, J. E., & Hastings, P. D. (2007) · Cited by 5,003
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 2×
“These findings extend past findings by Piazza (2012). Piazza’s studies focused on religiosity and provided participants with the option of justifying their condemnation for various acts, along a continuum, by either appealing to the violation of a rule or a negative consequence. Measures of religiosity were found to u…”
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology
Haidt, J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137651 · Cited by 2,504
Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/0011526042365555 · Cited by 2,079
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613 · Cited by 1,747
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 · Cited by 1,632
A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice
Duckitt, J. (2001) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80004-6 · Cited by 1,416
The Other “Authoritarian Personality”
Altemeyer, B. (1998) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60382-2 · Cited by 1,412
American grace: how religion divides and unites us
Phillips, J. W., Putnam, R. D., Campbell, D. E., & Garrett, S. R. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-5765 · Cited by 1,401
Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015474 · Cited by 1,161
The Other "Authoritarian Personality"
Altemeyer, B. (2004) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-4 · Cited by 1,004
Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions
Tetlock, P. E. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00135-9 · Cited by 915
American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us
Silk, M. (2011) · Journal of American History · doi:10.1093/jahist/jar389 · Cited by 845
Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309353415 · Cited by 842 · cited 1×
“…thinking, disgust sensitivity Growing evidence suggests that political and religious orientation influence the way people approach morality (Graham & Haidt, 2010; Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009; Haidt, 2007; Inbar, Pizarro, Knobe, & Bloom, 2009; Janoff-Bulman, Sheikh, & Baldacci, 2008;…”
Baron, J., & Spranca, M. D. (1997) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2690 · Cited by 653
Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God.
Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0025391 · Cited by 557
Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010 · Cited by 521
The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul
(2007) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7504.003.0004 · Cited by 494
Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0015960 · Cited by 466
The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire
Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997) · Pastoral Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02230993 · Cited by 425
Disgust Sensitivity, Political Conservatism, and Voting
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611429024 · Cited by 358
Moral dumbfounding: when intuition finds no reason
Björklund, F., Haidt, J., & Murphy, S. (2000) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 334
Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill
Rosen, F. (2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203987353 · Cited by 277
Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation
van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.017 · Cited by 274
Layman, G. C., & Carmines, E. G. (1997) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2998636 · Cited by 181
Mapping moral motives: Approach, avoidance, and political orientation
Janoff‐Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Baldacci, K. G. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.003 · Cited by 179
When it takes a bad person to do the right thing
Uhlmann, E. L., Zhu, L. (., & Tannenbaum, D. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.005 · Cited by 149
The Role of Moral Commitments in Moral Judgment
Lombrozo, T. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01013.x · Cited by 127
Religious Influences in the 2004 Presidential Election
Guth, J. L., Kellstedt, L. A., Smidt, C. E., & Green, J. C. (2006) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.00300.x · Cited by 113
The fine line between interrogation and retribution
Carlsmith, K. M., & Sood, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.025 · Cited by 83
Olson, L. R., & Green, J. C. (2006) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096506060860 · Cited by 74
Piazza, J. (2012) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2011.638598 · Cited by 48
Self-citationSinnott-Armstrong, W. P. (2009) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195337631.001.0001 · Cited by 46
Moral emotions and the envisaging of mitigating circumstances for wrongdoing
Piazza, J. R., Russell, P. S., & Sousa, P. (2012) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.736859 · Cited by 45
Self-citation書評 Frederick Rosen: Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. London and New York: Routledge, 2003
深貝, 保. (2005) · Keizaigakushi Gakkai nenpo/Keizaigakushi Gakkai nempō · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Greene J. D., 2008, Moral psychology: The neuroscience of morality, 35
- Kant I., 1797, Practical philosophy, 611
- Mill J. S., 1861, Utilitarianism
- Piazza J., 2013, Because God commands it: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority explains the link between religiosity and non-consequentialist moral thinking
- Russell P. S., 2012, When do deontological arguments communicate more moral conviction than consequentialist arguments?
- Sinnott-Armstrong W. (2009a). Consequentialism. In Zalta E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.science.uva.nl/∼seop/archives/spr2009/entries/consequ-entialism
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond sacrificial harm: a two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000093 · Cited by 434
The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS)
Everett, J. A. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082131 · Cited by 452
Rutjens, B. T., Sutton, R. M., & van der Lee, R. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217741314 · Cited by 381
Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Emlen Metz, S. (2015) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003 · Cited by 346
Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Piazza, J., & Sousa, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Piazza, Jared
- Venue
- Social Psychological and Personality Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-06-13
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 334-342
- ISSN
- 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2100942092
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- religiosity, political conservatism, moral judgment, taboo violation, disgust sensitivity, intuitive thinking, moral transgression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
