The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studying Reddit: A Systematic Overview of Disciplines, Approaches, Methods, and Ethics
Open accessAbstract
This article offers a systematic analysis of 727 manuscripts that used Reddit as a data source, published between 2010 and 2020. Our analysis reveals the increasing growth in use of Reddit as a data source, the range of disciplines this research is occurring in, how researchers are getting access to Reddit data, the characteristics of the datasets researchers are using, the subreddits and topics being studied, the kinds of analysis and methods researchers are engaging in, and the emerging ethical questions of research in this space. We discuss how researchers need to consider the impact of Reddit’s algorithms, affordances, and generalizability of the scientific knowledge produced using Reddit data, as well as the potential ethical dimensions of research that draws data from subreddits with potentially sensitive populations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“2) the platform's pseudonymity encourages candid disclosure of struggles and skill gaps that would be unlikely to surface in formal publications or institutional surveys [18].”
From Students' Practices and Skills in the LLM-Era: "You Can't Outsource the Struggle and Still Get the Skill" (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Proferes et al. [18] conducted a systematic overview of 727 studies that used Reddit as a corpus, finding it widely adopted in fields ranging from public health to computer science, and identifying best practices for ethical and methodological rigor when mining community-generated content.”
From Students' Practices and Skills in the LLM-Era: "You Can't Outsource the Struggle and Still Get the Skill" (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Reddit has been established as a viable and rich data source across multiple research disciplines.”
From Students' Practices and Skills in the LLM-Era: "You Can't Outsource the Struggle and Still Get the Skill" (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Firer-Blaess, S., & Fuchs, C. (2014) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476412450193 · Cited by 8,361
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1×
“Studies such as these suggest that researchers may need to consider the generalizability and representativeness of models built using Reddit data, particularly in the context of ongoing conversations regarding language modeling (see Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundLeopold, H. (2012) · Elektrotech. Informationstechnik · doi:10.1007/s00502-012-0080-6 · Cited by 2,181
(2019) · American Historical Review · doi:10.1093/ahr/rhz1005 · Cited by 1,762
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264
The Pushshift Reddit DatasetPreprint
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J. (2020) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.08435 · Cited by 1,185 · cited 2×
“The Pushshift dataset contains submissions and comments posted on Reddit since June 2005, and has been popular for researchers due to its ease of use and larger querying limits (Baumgartner et al., 2020).”
BackgroundHaddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018) · Environmental Evidence · doi:10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7 · Cited by 946
Tufekci, Z. (2014) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1403.7400 · Cited by 872 · cited 1×
“Tufekci (2014) once called Twitter the “model organism” for academic study because tweets are considered to be “public,” because Twitter has open APIs which fosters easy data collection, and because Twitter users often respond to world events as they unfold, making it a useful location to gather…”
BackgroundUser Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection
Isaak, J., & Hanna, M. J. (2018) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2018.3191268 · Cited by 700 · cited 1×
“For example, personally identifiable information from more than 87 million Facebook users was collected in an academic study, but then the data were used by Cambridge Analytica to micro-target political advertisements (Isaak & Hanna, 2018).”
MethodAnonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice
Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794114550439 · Cited by 653 · cited 1×
“Moreover, the smaller the community being studied in any context, the more difficult it is to maintain the anonymity of research subjects (Saunders et al., 2015), even without the additional complication of direct quotes being discoverable by search engines (Bruckman, 2002; Markham, 2012).”
Background“Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics
Fiesler, C. L., & Proferes, N. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118763366 · Cited by 545 · cited 3×
“Fiesler and Proferes (2018) conducted a survey of Twitter users to assess how they felt about their data being used.”
BackgroundSelf-citationFABRICATION AS ETHICAL PRACTICE: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous Internet contexts
Markham, A. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2011.641993 · Cited by 484 · cited 4×
“One of the major concerns of research using public data is privacy, including what constitutes “public,” whether measures should be taken to prevent the discoverability of data sources, and to what extent research subjects should be disguised (Bruckman, 2002; Markham, 2012; Zimmer, 2018).”
BackgroundInfluential(2014) · iConference 2014 Proceedings · doi:10.9776/14308 · Cited by 423 · cited 2×
“Reddit has also been home to a number of prominent and controversial events, such as attempts to identify the Boston-city bombing terrorists (Starbird et al., 2014); a massive leak of hacked celebrity photos (Marwick, 2017); the coordinated attempt to take on short-sellers of the GameStop stock (Roose, 2021); as well…”
BackgroundBruckman, A. (2002) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1023/a:1021316409277 · Cited by 402 · cited 3×
“One of the major concerns of research using public data is privacy, including what constitutes “public,” whether measures should be taken to prevent the discoverability of data sources, and to what extent research subjects should be disguised (Bruckman, 2002; Markham, 2012; Zimmer, 2018).”
BackgroundWhere are human subjects in big data research? the emerging ethics divide
Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716650211 · Cited by 394 · cited 1×
“…communities and among Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), there is disagreement about the ethical practices that should follow from the use of public data for research purposes and if, or when, using social media constitutes human subject research (Metcalf & Crawford, 2016; Vitak et al., 2016).”
BackgroundCharacterizing and predicting postpartum depression from shared facebook data
Choudhury, M. D., Counts, S., Horvitz, E., & Hoff, A. (2014) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2531602.2531675 · Cited by 391 · cited 1×
“Researchers have used social media data for a wide range of purposes—from predicting postpartum depression from Facebook posts (De Choudhury et al., 2014) to trying to predict movements in the stock market based on the sentiment of Tweets (Mittal & Goel, 2010).”
BackgroundPotential Biases in Big Data: Omitted Voices on Social Media
Hargittai, E. (2018) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439318788322 · Cited by 383
Computational Research in the Post-API Age
Freelon, D. (2018) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1477506 · Cited by 336 · cited 3×
“Researchers have used social media data for a wide range of purposes—from predicting postpartum depression from Facebook posts (De Choudhury et al., 2014) to trying to predict movements in the stock market based on the sentiment of Tweets (Mittal & Goel, 2010).”
BackgroundAfter the ‘APIcalypse’: social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research
Bruns, A. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1637447 · Cited by 319 · cited 7×
“Some have suggested that dataset sharing upon request is a good compromise (Fiesler, 2019), and Twitter has dealt with this issue by changing its terms of service so that full JSON data is not allowed to be redistributed, instead, only Tweet IDs can be shared which must then be “rehydrated” (see Summers, 2016/2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialHuman-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation: The Case of Reddit Automoderator
Jhaver, S., Birman, I., Gilbert, E., & Bruckman, A. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3338243 · Cited by 289 · cited 1×
“For these reasons, Reddit has an ecosystem of bots created by its user base to help in several ways, such as content moderation (Jhaver et al., 2019), adding functionality through summarizing information and linking to other websites, or providing humor through parody bot accounts (Long et al.,…”
BackgroundChandrasekharan, E., Samory, M., Jhaver, S., Charvat, H., Bruckman, A., Lampe, C., Eisenstein, J., & Gilbert, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274301 · Cited by 282 · cited 1×
“While there are a few overarching Reddit rules about content, subreddits vary considerably regarding what they allow, and in their specific cultures and norms (Chandrasekharan et al., 2018; Fiesler et al., 2018).”
Background“Go Away”: Participant Objections to Being Studied and the Ethics of Chatroom Research
Hudson, J., & Bruckman, A. (2004) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240490423030 · Cited by 266 · cited 1×
“Hudson and Bruckman (2004) found in their study of online chatrooms that the smaller the group being observed, the less comfortable they were with researcher presence.”
BackgroundExploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit
Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., & Alani, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science · doi:10.1145/3292522.3326045 · Cited by 265 · cited 2×
“, 2020), sexist (Farrell et al., 2019), and vitriolic political discourse (Mills, 2018).”
BackgroundA topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics
Zimmer, M., & Proferes, N. J. (2014) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-09-2013-0083 · Cited by 257
Self-citationVitak, J., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2016) · Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work · doi:10.1145/2818048.2820078 · Cited by 217 · cited 3×
“…communities and among Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), there is disagreement about the ethical practices that should follow from the use of public data for research purposes and if, or when, using social media constitutes human subject research (Metcalf & Crawford, 2016; Vitak et al., 2016).”
BackgroundThe reproducibility “crisis”: Reaction to replication crisis should not stifle innovation
Hunter, P. (2017) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201744876 · Cited by 201 · cited 2×
“Open science is a laudable goal, particularly in the wake of concerns over a reproducibility crisis in social science research (Baker, 2016), though concerns about ethics are one potential barrier to sharing datasets and other research artifacts (Wacharamanotham et al.”
BackgroundAddressing Conceptual Gaps in Big Data Research Ethics: An Application of Contextual Integrity
Zimmer, M. T. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118768300 · Cited by 172 · cited 4×
“And a group of Danish researchers were criticized after they publicly released a data set of nearly 70,000 users of the online dating site OkCupid, which included “usernames, age, gender, location, what kind of relationship (or sex) they are interested in, personality traits, and answers to thousands of personal profi…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationReddit Rules! Characterizing an Ecosystem of Governance
Fiesler, C., Jiang, J., McCann, J., Frye, K., & Brubaker, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15033 · Cited by 165 · cited 2×
“While there are a few overarching Reddit rules about content, subreddits vary considerably regarding what they allow, and in their specific cultures and norms (Chandrasekharan et al., 2018; Fiesler et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDon’t quote me: reverse identification of research participants in social media studies
Ayers, J., Caputi, T. L., Nebeker, C., & Dredze, M. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0036-2 · Cited by 151 · cited 2×
“While this is a fairly common practice in research papers (Ayers et al., 2018), where subreddit content is potentially sensitive (such as when the quote involves mental health, drug use, sexual activity, and is potentially from a minor), there may be outsized safety or privacy risks to those data subjects if their con…”
BackgroundTransparency of CHI Research Artifacts: Results of a Self-Reported Survey
Wacharamanotham, C., Eisenring, L., Haroz, S., & Echtler, F. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376448 · Cited by 130 · cited 1×
“Open science is a laudable goal, particularly in the wake of concerns over a reproducibility crisis in social science research (Baker, 2016), though concerns about ethics are one potential barrier to sharing datasets and other research artifacts (Wacharamanotham et al., 2020).”
BackgroundLeavitt, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675175 · Cited by 113 · cited 1×
““Throwaway” accounts, or single-purpose accounts created for limited time use, are commonly used when users do not want a post or comment associated with their main or primary account, such as sharing sensitive or personal information (Ammari et al., 2019; Leavitt, 2015).”
BackgroundEthics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards
Vitak, J., Proferes, N., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2017) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/1556264617725200 · Cited by 105 · cited 2×
“Many (though not all) ethics review bodies would likely view most Reddit data as “public” and therefore not require researchers to seek consent (see Vitak et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSmith, D. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102411-9.00001-7 · Cited by 104
Self-declared Throwaway Accounts on Reddit
Ammari, T., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Romero, D. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359237 · Cited by 102 · cited 1×
““Throwaway” accounts, or single-purpose accounts created for limited time use, are commonly used when users do not want a post or comment associated with their main or primary account, such as sharing sensitive or personal information (Ammari et al., 2019; Leavitt, 2015).”
Fiesler, C. L., Beard, N., & Keegan, B. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7290 · Cited by 101 · cited 3×
“As Fiesler et al. (2020) note in their analysis of data scraping provisions in a large number of social media TOS, these policies largely lack the context that would be relevant to an ethical decision (e.g., what kind of data or what it is being used for).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationWhere Have All the Data Gone? A Critical Reflection on Academic Digital Research in the Post-API Age
Tromble, R. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305121988929 · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“In recent years, major social media platforms like Facebook (Freelon, 2018), Instagram, and Twitter (Bruns, 2019) have begun restricting API access (Tromble, 2021).”
BackgroundMittos, A., Zannettou, S., Blackburn, J., & Cristofaro, E. D. (2019) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.09735 · Cited by 76 · cited 2×
“…et al., 2014); a massive leak of hacked celebrity photos (Marwick, 2017); the coordinated attempt to take on short-sellers of the GameStop stock (Roose, 2021); as well as sometimes racist (Mittos et al., 2020), sexist (Farrell et al., 2019), and vitriolic political discourse (Mills, 2018).”
BackgroundEthical and privacy considerations for research using online fandom data
Dym, B., & Fiesler, C. (2020) · Transformative Works and Cultures · doi:10.3983/twc.2020.1733 · Cited by 75 · cited 1×
“…subreddit content is potentially sensitive (such as when the quote involves mental health, drug use, sexual activity, and is potentially from a minor), there may be outsized safety or privacy risks to those data subjects if their content is shared beyond its intended context (Dym & Fiesler, 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citation"Could You Define That in Bot Terms"?: Requesting, Creating and Using Bots on Reddit
Long, K. S., Vines, J., Sutton, S., Brooker, P., Feltwell, T., Kirman, B., Barnett, J., & Lawson, S. (2017) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025830 · Cited by 72 · cited 1×
“…these reasons, Reddit has an ecosystem of bots created by its user base to help in several ways, such as content moderation (Jhaver et al., 2019), adding functionality through summarizing information and linking to other websites, or providing humor through parody bot accounts (Long et al., 2017).”
BackgroundGaffney, D., & Matias, J. N. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200162 · Cited by 63 · cited 1×
“However, PushShift is not an exact mirror of data from Reddit (see: Gaffney & Matias, 2018 and the rejoinder from Baumgartner, 2018 for more).”
MethodScandal or sex crime? Gendered privacy and the celebrity nude photo leaks
Marwick, A. E. (2017) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-017-9431-7 · Cited by 61 · cited 2×
“…events, such as attempts to identify the Boston-city bombing terrorists (Starbird et al., 2014); a massive leak of hacked celebrity photos (Marwick, 2017); the coordinated attempt to take on short-sellers of the GameStop stock (Roose, 2021); as well as sometimes racist (Mittos et al.,…”
BackgroundEthical Considerations for Research Involving (Speculative) Public Data
Fiesler, C. (2019) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3370271 · Cited by 58 · cited 2×
“Some have suggested that dataset sharing upon request is a good compromise (Fiesler, 2019), and Twitter has dealt with this issue by changing its terms of service so that full JSON data is not allowed to be redistributed, instead, only Tweet IDs can be shared which must then be “rehydrated” (see Summers, 2016/2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSocial Media Users’ Views on the Ethics of Social Media Research
Beninger, K. (2016) · doi:10.4135/9781473983847.n5 · Cited by 45 · cited 1×
“Their findings showed that users were largely unaware that their data were used for research purposes and that perceptions of data use varied by contextual factors, such as who the researchers are and the topic of study, a finding echoing that of Beninger (2017).”
BackgroundCSCW Research Ethics Town Hall: Working Towards Community Norms
Bruckman, A., Fiesler, C., Hancock, J., & Munteanu, C. (2017) · CSCW Companion · doi:10.1145/3022198.3022199 · Cited by 40 · cited 1×
“Although there have been calls for more open discussion of ethical issues within these communities to help establish these kinds of norms (Bruckman et al., 2017), explicit discussion of ethical considerations in this dataset of papers is uncommon.”
BackgroundSelf-citationPop-up political advocacy communities on reddit.com: SandersForPresident and The Donald
Mills, R. A. (2017) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0712-9 · Cited by 37 · cited 1×
“, 2019), and vitriolic political discourse (Mills, 2018).”
Gaming Reddit’s Algorithm: r/the_donald, Amplification, and the Rhetoric of Sorting
Shepherd, R. P. (2020) · Computers and Composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102572 · Cited by 34 · cited 1×
“There is also sometimes gaming of Reddit’s sorting algorithm which can also drive conversational patterns (Shepherd, 2020).”
BackgroundApplying an Ethics of Care to Internet Research: Gamergate and Digital Humanities
Suomela, T., Chee, F. M., Berendt, B., & Rockwell, G. (2019) · Digital Studies/Le champ numérique · doi:10.16995/dscn.302 · Cited by 30
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Baker M., 2016, Nature, 533, 353
- Baumgartner J., 2020, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14, 830
- Beninger K., 2017, The Sage handbook of social media research methods, 57
- Ferris L., 2011, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2, 172
- Fiesler C., 2019, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 1
- Fiesler C., 2020, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14, 187
- Fiesler C., 2018, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 12
- Isaak J., 2018, Computer, 51, 56
- Mittos A., 2020, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14, 452
- Reddit.com. (2020a). Reddit’s 2020 year in review. https://redditblog.com/2020/12/08/reddits-2020-year-in-review/
- Starbird K., 2014, iConference 2014 Proceedings, 654
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trauma-Informed Computing: Towards Safer Technology Experiences for All
Chen, J. X., McDonald, A., Zou, Y., Tseng, E., Roundy, K., Tamersoy, A., Schaub, F., Ristenpart, T., & Dell, N. L. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517475 · Cited by 201
“data such as those in online forums may also be an alternative to asking survivors to recount their stories, although researchers should thoroughly weigh the ethical and privacy implications of using such data [144] to avoid potential violations of users’ expectations [54].”
BackgroundSocial Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems
Park, J. S., Popowski, L., Cai, C., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3526113.3545616 · Cited by 212
Remember the Human: A Systematic Review of Ethical Considerations in Reddit Research
Fiesler, C., Zimmer, M., Proferes, N., Gilbert, S., & Jones, N. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3633070 · Cited by 113
“A comprehensive review of Reddit research between 2010 and 2020 revealed a steady increase in the number of papers published year over year [91].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationA Trade-off-centered Framework of Content Moderation
Jiang, J. A., Nie, P., Brubaker, J. R., & Fiesler, C. L. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3534929 · Cited by 90
“This relatively rare occurrence of explicit research ethics discussions is in line with the findings from a recent systematic literature review of Reddit-based research studies [86].”
ResultSelf-citationThe Ethics of Publicly Available Data Research: A Situated Ethics Framework for Reddit
Gliniecka, M. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231192021 · Cited by 81
“The ethical issues of research on Reddit are rarely engaged with in academic publications (Proferes et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Proferes, N., Jones, N., Gilbert, S., Fiesler, C., & Zimmer, M.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Office for National Statistics (GB)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Marquette University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Proferes, Nicholas
- Venue
- Social Media + Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3167344319
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 134 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 170.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- Reddit, online communities, subreddits, research ethics, data access, generalizability, sensitive populations, research methodology, disciplinary trends, social media research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review