Boundaries on Parent Involvement in Their Child’s Anxiety Cognitive-Behavioral-Treatment Outcome: Parent Reinforcement and Relationship Behaviors Moderate Outcome
Open accessAbstract
Extending a recent parent-mediation efficacy trial, we identified parent reinforcement and relationship behaviors as setting boundary conditions, or moderators, of youths’ anxiety outcome in 254 youths and their parents, who were randomized to (a) cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) with parent reinforcement-behavior training (CBT + Reinf), (b) CBT with parent relationship-behavior training (CBT + Relat), or (c) individual-youth CBT—a comparator control arm. Findings revealed that parents with high baseline negative-reinforcement levels and acceptance levels (i.e., above the mean) report their children as having lower anxiety at outcome when assigned to CBT + Reinf and CBT + Relat, respectively, versus CBT. No moderation effects were found for either parent positive reinforcement or parent psychological control. Implications for treating anxiety disorders and moving toward precision-treatment approaches in youths and the importance of research replication and extension are discussed. © The Author(s) 2023.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
9 of 33 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premiseown data
In the Silverman et al. (2022) trial, youths in either CBT with parent involvement arm had lower average anxiety than those in individual youth CBT.
“Findings revealed that on average youths in either one of the two CBTs with parent involvement had lower anxiety than those in individual youth CBT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Silverman et al., 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Silverman and colleagues (2022) conducted a comparative randomized clinical trial evaluating two CBT arms with parent involvement and an individual child CBT arm among youths with primary anxiety diagnoses.
“Silverman and colleagues (2022) conducted a comparative randomized clinical trial to evaluate two CBT arms with parent involvement, and an individual child CBT arm, among youths with primary anxiety diagnoses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Silverman et al., 2022 source
- Premisecitation
The importance of parent negative reinforcement and parent psychological control in youth anxiety is strongly grounded in theory, research, and clinical practice.
“The importance of parent negative reinforcement and parent psychological control in youth anxiety is strongly grounded in theory, research, and clinical practice (e.g., Creswell et al., 2020; Ginsburg et al., 1995; McLeod et al., 2007; van der Bruggen et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Creswell et al., 2020 source
The Development section reports some longitudinal and experimental evidence linking parental overinvolvement or control to child anxiety, and the treatment-components section reports that reductions in parental psychological control mediated outcomes in one form of CBT (pages not provided). The copy does not establish the claimed importance of parent negative reinforcement, and its qualified account of parental control does not support describing both factors as strongly grounded across theory, research, and clinical practice. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ginsburg et al., 1995 source
- cites McLeod et al., 2007 source
- Interpretationcitation
Confidence in the moderator findings is enhanced because they are based on a large sample size.
“Nonetheless, enhanced confidence can be found in our moderator findings because they are based on a large sample size (Silverman et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Silverman et al., 2022 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) links sample size to statistical power, noting that detecting some outcomes requires much larger samples. It does not assess the citing authors’ sample or say that a large sample enhances confidence in moderator findings specifically. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
There were no statistically significant baseline differences between treatment nonstarters and youth who began treatment on outcome, moderator, or sociodemographic variables.
“There were no statistically significant differences between nonstarters and youth who began treatment on any of the outcome and moderator measures, as well as sociodemographic variables (e.g., youth age, sex, ethnicity) as measured at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The analysis found no evidence of nonlinear moderation effects.
“We explored possible nonlinear moderation effects using quadratic and cubic terms. We found no evidence to support nonlinearity; we therefore focus our presentation of results on linear moderation effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Youth in CBT + Reinf had significantly lower parent-rated anxiety (RCMAS/P) than youth in CBT when baseline parent NR was high (above 44; mean = 40.82, SD = 6.61).
“As shown in Figure 2, the Johnson-Neyman regions of significance test indicated that RCMAS/P scores were significantly lower for youth in the CBT + Reinf arm than youth in the CBT arm when parent NR scores were high at baseline (i.e., above 44; mean = 40.82, SD = 6.61).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Youth in CBT + Relat had significantly lower parent-rated anxiety (RCMAS/P) than youth in CBT when baseline parent ACC was high (above 19; mean = 16.70, SD = 3.80).
“As shown in Figure 1, the Johnson-Neyman regions of significance test indicated that RCMAS/P scores were significantly lower for youth in the CBT + Relat arm than youth in the CBT arm when parent ACC scores were high at baseline (i.e., above 19; mean = 16.70, SD = 3.80).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the analyzed sample of 254 youths and their parents, parent acceptance (ACC) significantly moderated youth anxiety outcome for the CBT + Relat versus CBT contrast (coefficient = −0.99, z = −2.76, p = .006).
“Findings showed that parent ACC significantly moderated treatment outcome for the contrast between the CBT + Relat arm and the CBT arm (coefficient = −0.99, z = −2.76, p = .006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No moderation effects were found for the contrasts between CBT + Relat and CBT + Reinf.
“No moderation effects were found for the contrasts between CBT + Relat and CBT + Reinf.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Parent negative reinforcement (NR) significantly moderated youth anxiety outcome for the CBT + Reinf versus CBT contrast (coefficient = −0.23, z = −2.32, p = .02).
“Along similar lines, parent NR scores significantly moderated treatment outcome for the contrast between the CBT + Reinf arm and the CBT arm (coefficient = −0.23, z = −2.32, p = .02).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Statistical efforts to investigate all possible moderators worsen power problems because increasingly stringent Type 1 corrections are commonly applied as the number of moderator variables increases.
“Statistical efforts to do so further exacerbate the power problem because increasingly stringent Type 1 corrections are commonly applied as the number of moderator variables increases (Perneger, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Perneger, 1998 source
- Interpretationown data
Because nonstarter status was not significantly related to any studied variable, the nonstarter imbalance should not affect the results given the sample size.
“Given that nonstarter status was not significantly related to any of the variables studied, the imbalance should not affect the results given our sample size (Strube, 1991, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Strube, 1991, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Youth anxiety is maintained by parent use of negative reinforcement.
“The clinical translation is that youth anxiety is maintained by parent use of negative reinforcement (e.g., Bogels & Brechman-Touissant, 2006; Marks, 1987; McLeod, Wood, & Weisz, 2007; Silverman & Kurtines, 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bogels & Brechman-Touissant, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Marks, 1987
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites McLeod, Wood, & Weisz, 2007 source
- Rests on an assumption: Avoidance of feared stimuli is negatively reinforced by short-term reduction of aversive fear or anxiety, which maintains continued fear and avoidance.
- Premisecitation
Findings in youth anxiety moderator studies often show either no significant moderators or few that fail to replicate, including in reviews and meta-analyses.
“Findings often reveal either no significant moderators or a meager number that fail to replicate, including in evaluative reviews and meta-analyses (e.g., Bennett et al., 2013; Herres et al., 2015; Nilsen et al., 2013; Norris & Kendall, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Study design and conductcitation
All youths met DSM-IV criteria for a primary anxiety disorder using the ADIS-IV: C/P.
“All youths met criteria for a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th Edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) anxiety disorder using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-IV: C/P; Silverman & Albano, 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites American Psychiatric Association, 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Silverman & Albano, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
These findings are the first to show moderating effects of parent variables, specifically parent acceptance and parent negative reinforcement, on youth anxiety CBT outcome.
“They are the first to show moderating effects of any parent variables, and even more of a contribution, specific parent variables: parent use of acceptance and parent use of negative reinforcement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 18
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTraining parents to use less negative reinforcement and less psychological control played central roles in their child's anxiety reductions in the Silverman et al. (2022) trial, whereas training parents to use more positive reinforcement and more acceptance did not.
“Although both perspectives are plausible, we lean toward the behavior-reduction perspective due to Silverman and colleagues’ (2022) other novel findings: Training parents to use less negative reinforcement and less psychological control played central roles in their child’s anxiety reductions. This was not found when parents were trained to use more positive reinforcement and more acceptance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Silverman et al., 2022 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Silverman et al. (2022) trial used a dismantling design to examine how parental involvement influences outcome by testing distinct parent components as mediators.
“In addition to addressing whether either or both of the parent involvement CBTs would enhance outcome compared with individual child CBT, the trial used a dismantling design to address how parental involvement influences outcome by investigating distinct parent components contained within each of the two CBT + parent arms as mediators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Silverman et al., 2022 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTreatment moderator identification has been studied sparingly in randomized trials of youth anxiety disorders.
“From a precision treatment perspective, this long sought grail – the identification of treatment moderators - has been studied sparingly in youth anxiety disorders randomized trials (e.g., Compton et al., 2014; Lebowitz et al., 2021; Patriarca et al., 2022; Taylor et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrescribing therapy based on patient baseline characteristics (moderators) to improve treatment efficacy has long been sought in adult and youth clinical psychological science outcome research.
“The ability to prescribe a therapy on the basis of patient baseline characteristics, referred to as moderators in the literature, to enhance treatment efficacy has long been a holy grail in clinical psychological science outcome research with adults (e.g., Beutler & Clarkin, 1990; McKnight et al., 1984) and children and adolescents (youth) (e.g., Burke & Silverman, 1987; March & Curry, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Beutler & Clarkin, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites McKnight et al., 1984 source
- cites Burke & Silverman, 1987 source
Semantic Scholar found the cited Burke and Silverman paper but returned no full-text snippets for either of two queries. Its title, “The prescriptive treatment of school refusal,” is consistent with tailoring treatment for youth, but does not establish the broader claim about adult and youth outcome research or baseline moderators. An unscoped search found a related passage in “Predictors and moderators of outcome of psychotherapeutic interventions for mental disorders in adolescents and young adults” (score 0.72); without accessible text from the cited paper, that match is insufficient to establish misattribution. (LLM, conf=0.68)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither parent positive reinforcement (PR) nor parent psychological control (PC) moderated youth anxiety outcome.
“Neither parent PR nor parent PC moderated outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA simplest explanation for null or nonreplicated moderator findings is that no true clinically meaningful moderating effects exist.
“The simplest explanation is also that there are no true clinically meaningful moderating effects (Erceg-Hurn et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erceg-Hurn et al., 2023 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataYouth baseline anxiety, sex, age, and ethnicity were included as covariates in all moderation analyses.
“We included youth baseline anxiety scores, sex, age, and ethnicity as covariates in all analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBaseline variation in parenting behaviors may be key for identifying which treatment works for whom and for moving toward precision treatment.
“Baseline variation may be key for identifying which treatment works for whom to enhance outcome and to move closer toward precision treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationParent psychological control has extensive lineage in the child development literature.
“Similarly, parent psychological control has extensive and rich lineage in the child development literature (Becker, 1964; Schaefer, 1965).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Becker, 1964
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schaefer, 1965 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe PRPBI parent psychological control subscale had an omega total of 0.74 and the acceptance subscale had an omega total of 0.79 in this sample.
“In this sample, omega (ωt) was .74 for PC and .79 for ACC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenTreatment manuals were developed to standardize all treatment sessions.
“Treatment manuals were developed to standardize all treatment sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe parent-report anxiety measure (RCMAS/P) had an omega total of 0.87 in this sample.
“In this sample, omega (ωt) was 0.87.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe CDQ parent positive reinforcement subscale had an omega total of 0.89 and the negative reinforcement subscale had an omega total of 0.70 in this sample.
“In this sample, omega (ωt) was 0.89 for PR and .70 for NR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe observed imbalance in nonstarter proportions across treatment arms was likely due to randomization-related sampling variation and was not large enough to affect outcome analyses.
“The differential proportions between treatment arms for nonstarters was likely due to sampling imbalance that might be expected via randomization and was not of sufficient size to be consequential for analysis of study outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataMissing data bias was assessed by correlating missingness dummy variables with all other variables, and no meaningful bias was observed.
“Missing data bias was assessed by creating a dummy variable reflecting the presence or absence of missing data for each variable and then correlating it with all other variables. No meaningful bias was observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll parents and youths provided informed consent or assent before participation.
“All parents and youths provided informed consent/assent prior to participation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was approved by the university's institutional review board.
“The study was approved by the university’s institutional review board.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataEligible youths were randomly assigned to CBT + Reinf, CBT + Relat, or individual CBT.
“Eligible youths were randomly assigned to CBT + Reinf, CBT + Relat, and CBT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationParent psychological control conveys to children that they cannot handle new, challenging, or anxiety-provoking situations, thereby limiting child autonomy in those situations.
“Parent psychological control conveys to their children that they are unable to handle new, challenging, or anxiety-provoking situations, limiting child autonomy in these situations (Hudson & Rapee, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hudson & Rapee, 2004
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenDevelopmental disabilities, psychosis, or current involvement in another psychosocial treatment were exclusion criteria.
“Developmental disabilities, psychosis, or current involvement in another psychosocial treatment were exclusion criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe finding that parent-involvement CBTs outperformed individual CBT is novel and important given inconsistent prior data on whether parent involvement enhances child anxiety CBT outcome.
“These are novel and important findings given the lack of consistent data showing that parent involvement in their child’s CBT enhances anxiety outcome (e.g., Kendall et al., 2008; Nauta et al., 2003; Peris et al., 2021; Silverman et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenMissing data were handled using full-information maximum-likelihood estimation.
“Missing data were accommodated using full-information maximum-likelihood (FIML) estimation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe association between a treatment and its outcome measure could depend on countless variables, and investigating all possible candidate moderators is onerous.
“Moreover, from a grail half empty perspective, the latter conclusion overlooks two decades’ old clinical trials literature that the association between a treatment and that treatment’s outcome measure(s) could depend on countless variables and investigating all possible candidate variables as moderators is onerous (Kazdin, 2001; Kraemer et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kazdin, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kraemer et al., 2002 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFor families with high baseline parent negative reinforcement, training parents in reinforcement behaviors including reducing negative reinforcement yields better outcome; for families with high baseline parent acceptance, training parents in relationship behaviors including enhancing acceptance yields better outcome.
“Our findings indicate, however, that to either reduce or enhance (that is the question) depends on the specific parent behavior and their respective boundary conditions; for families where parent negative reinforcement is high, treatment aimed at training parents in reinforcement behaviors, including reducing negative reinforcement behaviors, results in better outcome. For families where parent”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe generalizability of the findings from this efficacy trial is unclear, and replication and extension to community settings are needed.
“Another study limitation is the unclear generalizability of our findings from this efficacy trial and the need to replicate and extend them to community settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataParental involvement does not always enhance treatment effect; whether it helps depends on the parent behavior targeted and the baseline characteristics of the parent being targeted.
“The upshot is: parental involvement does not always enhance treatment effect because it depends on what is targeted and who is being targeted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe sample was predominantly mothers and Hispanic/Latino, so it is important to evaluate whether findings generalize to populations that include fathers.
“Further, because our large sample comprised predominately mothers and Hispanics/Latinos (a notable study strength), it will be important to evaluate the extent our findings generalize to other populations that also comprise fathers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataThe study identifies parent acceptance and parent negative reinforcement as significant moderators of youth anxiety outcome in two different CBT + parent arms, with their respective boundary conditions.
“Our study identifies parent behaviors that significantly moderate treatment outcome, and their respective boundary conditions, in two different CBT + parent arms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA study limitation is reliance on questionnaire data.
“One limitation is reliance on questionnaire data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe pattern of two parent variables moderating and two not moderating suggests a precision-treatment path for parent acceptance and negative reinforcement, while no precision approach is needed for parent psychological control and positive reinforcement.
“This is because the findings suggest a precision treatment path that could apply for parent acceptance and parent negative reinforcement (because they were found to moderate), while there is no need to apply a precision treatment approach for levels of parent psychological control and parent positive reinforcement (because they were found not to moderate).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
The paper relies on this without support.
Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
“However, such a scenario seems implausible; a more plausible scenario is that parents vary at baseline in their use of reinforcement and relationship behaviors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Between 40 and 50 percent of families have a child who did not benefit from anxiety CBTs.
“It may not be a reasonable conclusion, however, if one is among the 40 to 50 percent of families whose child did not benefit from anxiety CBTs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no literature as robust as that for negative reinforcement and psychological control regarding parent use of positive reinforcement and acceptance.
“There is no parallel literature as robust with regard to parent use of positive reinforcement and acceptance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Avoidance of feared stimuli is negatively reinforced by short-term reduction of aversive fear or anxiety, which maintains continued fear and avoidance.
“Indeed, that an organism’s avoidance of feared stimuli is negatively reinforced through the short-term reduction of aversive states (fear; anxiety), which serves to maintain continued fear and avoidance of stimuli is not new or controversial.”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentz = -2.76reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .006
“z = −2.76, p = .006”
- Consistentz = -2.32reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .020
“z = −2.32, p = .02”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Negative-reinforcement benefit is described with a lower cutoff than the reported boundary
MinorThe discussion describes the lower-anxiety outcome as applying when baseline negative reinforcement is above its mean of 40.82. The results report a significant treatment difference only for scores above 44, not for the entire above-mean range.
“Parents with high baseline negative reinforcement levels (i.e., above the mean) report their children as having lower anxiety at outcome, when assigned to CBT + Reinf versus CBT.”
“RCMAS/P scores were significantly lower for youth in the CBT + Reinf arm than youth in the CBT arm when parent NR scores were high at baseline (i.e., above 44; mean = 40.82, SD = 6.61).”
Acceptance benefit is described with a lower cutoff than the reported boundary
MinorThe discussion describes the lower-anxiety outcome as applying when baseline acceptance is above its mean of 16.70. The results report a significant treatment difference only for scores above 19, leaving scores between the mean and 19 outside the stated region of significance.
“Our findings show that parents with high baseline acceptance levels (i.e., above the mean) report their children as having lower anxiety at outcome, when assigned to CBT + Relat versus CBT.”
“RCMAS/P scores were significantly lower for youth in the CBT + Relat arm than youth in the CBT arm when parent ACC scores were high at baseline (i.e., above 19; mean = 16.70, SD = 3.80).”
Cites
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
Perneger, T. V. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236 · Cited by 5,900 · see citing works
Review of Child Development Research
Walters, J., Hoffman, M. L., & Hoffman, L. W. (1965) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/349834 · Cited by 3,658 · see citing works
Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials
Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877 · Cited by 2,562 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…conclusion overlooks the 2-decade-old clinical-trials literature that the association between a treatment and that treat-ment’s outcome measure(s) could depend on countless variables, and investigating all possible candidate variables as moderators is onerous (Kazdin, 2001; Kraemer et al., 2002).”
What I Think and Feel: A Revised Measure of Children's Manifest Anxiety
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1997) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1023/a:1025751206600 · Cited by 1,939 · see citing works
Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781412984522 · Cited by 1,797 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat i think and feel: A revised measure of children's manifest anxiety
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00919131 · Cited by 1,741 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale, Parent Version (RCMAS/P; Reynolds & Richmond, 1978) is a 37-item parent-rating scale that assesses child anxiety-symptom severity.”
Examining the association between parenting and childhood anxiety: a meta-analysis
McLeod, B. D., Wood, J. J., & Weisz, J. R. (2007) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.002 · Cited by 1,159 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The importance of parent negative reinforcement and parent psychological control in youths with anxiety is strongly grounded in theory, research, and clinical practice (e.g., Creswell et al., 2020; Ginsburg et al., 1995; McLeod et al., 2007; van der Bruggen et al., 2008).”
Generalized anxiety disorder: advances in research and practice
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3716 · Cited by 1,073 · see citing works
Family Issues in Child Anxiety: Attachment, Family Functioning, Parental Rearing and Beliefs
Bögels, S. M., & Brechman-Toussaint, M. L. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.08.001 · Cited by 708 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The clinical translation is that youths’ anxiety is maintained by parent use of negative reinforcement (e.g., Bögels & Brechman-Toussaint, 2006; Marks, 1987; McLeod et al., 2007; Silverman & Kurtines, 1996).”
A configurational analysis of children's reports of parent behavior
Schaefer, E. S. (1965) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0022702 · Cited by 675 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Likewise, parent psychological control has extensive and rich lineage in the child-development literature (Becker, 1964; Schaefer, 1965).”
Fears, Phobias, and Rituals. Panic, Anxiety, and Their Disorders.
(1987) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-607_3 · Cited by 665 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The clinical translation is that youths’ anxiety is maintained by parent use of negative reinforcement (e.g., Bögels & Brechman-Toussaint, 2006; Marks, 1987; McLeod et al., 2007; Silverman & Kurtines, 1996).”
Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for phobic and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
Silverman, W. K., Pina, A. A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410701817907 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Self-citationKendall, P. C., Hudson, J. L., Gosch, E., Flannery-Schroeder, E., & Suveg, C. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.2.282 · Cited by 579 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These are novel and important findings given the lack of consistent data showing that parent involvement in their child’s CBT enhances anxiety outcome (e.g., Kendall et al., 2008; Nauta et al., 2003; Peris et al., 2021; Silverman et al., 2009).”
van der Bruggen, C. O., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Bögels, S. M. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01898.x · Cited by 441 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The importance of parent negative reinforcement and parent psychological control in youths with anxiety is strongly grounded in theory, research, and clinical practice (e.g., Creswell et al., 2020; Ginsburg et al., 1995; McLeod et al., 2007; van der Bruggen et al., 2008).”
Replicability of Factors in Children's Report of Parent Behavior (CRPBI)
Schludermann, E. H., & Schludermann, S. M. (1970) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1970.9916845 · Cited by 380 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The parental psychological control (PC) and acceptance (ACC) subscales of the Parenting Behavior Inventory (PRPBI; Schludermann & Schludermann, 1970) were also used.”
Nauta, M. H., Scholing, A., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Minderaa, R. B. (2003) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000085752.71002.93 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Becker, K. D., Boustani, M., Gellatly, R., & Chorpita, B. F. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2017.1326121 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Systematic Treatment Selection
Beutler, L. E., & Clarkin, J. F. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315803746 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Directionality of change in youth anxiety treatment involving parents: An initial examination.
Silverman, W. K., Kurtines, W. M., Jaccard, J. J., & Piña, A. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015761 · Cited by 227 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These are novel and important findings given the lack of consistent data showing that parent involvement in their child’s CBT enhances anxiety outcome (e.g., Kendall et al., 2008; Nauta et al., 2003; Peris et al., 2021; Silverman et al., 2009).”
Self-citationCompton, S. N., Peris, T. S., Almirall, D., Birmaher, B., Sherrill, J., Kendall, P. C., March, J. S., Gosch, E. A., Ginsburg, G. S., Rynn, M. A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035458 · Cited by 226 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From a grail-half-full perspective, these findings have led to the conclusion that “current evidenced based treatments for pediatric anxiety disorders are effective across a diverse range of children and adolescents” (Compton et al., 2014, p. 221).”
Family involvement in treating children with phobic and anxiety disorders: A look ahead
Ginsburg, G. S., Silverman, W. K., & Kurtines, W. K. (1995) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(95)00026-l · Cited by 166 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The importance of parent negative reinforcement and parent psychological control in youths with anxiety is strongly grounded in theory, research, and clinical practice (e.g., Creswell et al., 2020; Ginsburg et al., 1995; McLeod et al., 2007; van der Bruggen et al., 2008).”
Self-citationPractitioner Review: Anxiety disorders in children and young people – assessment and treatment
Creswell, C., Waite, P., & Hudson, J. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13186 · Cited by 140 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The importance of parent negative reinforcement and parent psychological control in youths with anxiety is strongly grounded in theory, research, and clinical practice (e.g., Creswell et al., 2020; Ginsburg et al., 1995; McLeod et al., 2007; van der Bruggen et al., 2008).”
Schneider, R. L., Arch, J. J., & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.004 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the current study, we adopted a deductive strategy to identify moderators from Silverman and colleagues’ (2022) randomized controlled efficacy trial in that we consider variables conceptually relevant to the dysfunction and/or therapeutic outcome (Kazdin, 2001; Schneider et al., 2015).”
Nilsen, T. S., Eisemann, M., & Kvernmo, S. (2013) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-012-0316-3 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Kazdin, A. E. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.8.2.143 · Cited by 127 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…conclusion overlooks the 2-decade-old clinical-trials literature that the association between a treatment and that treat-ment’s outcome measure(s) could depend on countless variables, and investigating all possible candidate variables as moderators is onerous (Kazdin, 2001; Kraemer et al., 2002).”
Bennett, K., Manassis, K., Walter, S. D., Cheung, A., Wilansky-Traynor, P., Diaz-Granados, N., Duda, S., Rice, M., Baer, S., Barrett, P., et al. (2013) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22099 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationImportance of treating individually assessed response classes in the amelioration of depression
McKnight, D. L., Nelson, R. O., Hayes, S. C., & Jarrett, R. B. (1984) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(84)80001-5 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Systematic Treatment Selection: Toward Targeted Therapeutic Interventions
Munjas, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · doi:10.3928/0279-3695-19910301-16 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The prescriptive treatment of school refusal
Burke, A. E., & Silverman, W. K. (1987) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(87)90016-x · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citation(2004) · Cited by 90 · see citing works
When the Evidence Says, “Yes, No, and Maybe So”
Reyes, A. D. L., & Kazdin, A. E. (2008) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00546.x · Cited by 80 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…colleagues’ findings, which highlighted once again that informant discrepancy is more common than not in clinical research including clinical trials (De Los Reyes & Kazdin, 2008), our focus here, too, was on parent-questionnaire data, particularly data from the parent who participated in the…”
Silverman, W. K., & Kurtines, W. M. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9212-6 · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The clinical translation is that youths’ anxiety is maintained by parent use of negative reinforcement (e.g., Bögels & Brechman-Toussaint, 2006; Marks, 1987; McLeod et al., 2007; Silverman & Kurtines, 1996).”
Self-citationUsing Evaluative Criteria to Review Youth Anxiety Measures, Part II: Parent-Report
Etkin, R. G., Lebowitz, E. R., & Silverman, W. K. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2021.1878898 · Cited by 64 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is due to the high research and clinical utility of questionnaires, including being low cost and time efficient (e.g., Etkin et al., 2021).”
Self-citationTaylor, J. H., Lebowitz, E. R., Jakubovski, E., Coughlin, C. G., Silverman, W. K., & Bloch, M. H. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2017.1371028 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting the Outcome of Treatment
March, J. S., & Curry, J. F. (1998) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1023/a:1022682723027 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Peris, T. S., Thamrin, H., & Rozenman, M. S. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.053 · Cited by 57 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These are novel and important findings given the lack of consistent data showing that parent involvement in their child’s CBT enhances anxiety outcome (e.g., Kendall et al., 2008; Nauta et al., 2003; Peris et al., 2021; Silverman et al., 2009).”
Moderators of Outcome for Youth Anxiety Treatments: Current Findings and Future Directions
Norris, L. A., & Kendall, P. C. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2020.1833337 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Silverman, W. K., Marin, C. E., Rey, Y., Kurtines, W. M., Jaccard, J. J., & Pettit, J. W. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702619830404 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CBT contained only three meetings (beginning, middle, end of treatment), in which the therapist met with the parent and the child for about 15 min, similar to past work (e.g., Silverman et al., 2009, 2019).”
Self-citationRelationship between parental discipline and children's ability to cope with stress
Zabin, M. A., & Melamed, B. G. (1980) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf01321430 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Child Development Questionnaire, Parent Version (CDQ/P; Zabin & Melamed, 1980) is a list of 15 situations representative of common domains in youths with anxiety (e.g., separation from caregivers).”
Kazdin, A. E. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy/8.2.143 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Silverman, W. K., Rey, Y., Marin, C. E., Jaccard, J., & Pettit, J. W. (2022) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026211016402 · Cited by 30 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The randomized controlled efficacy trial on which the current study leverages (Silverman et al., 2022) was preregistered (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00 620958) and listed primary aims to examine outcome and mediation of parent-involvement CBTs.”
InfluentialSelf-citationSmall sample failure of random assignment: A further examination.
Strube, M. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.59.2.346 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Given that nonstarter status was not significantly related to any of the variables studied, the imbalance should not affect the results given our sample size (Strube, 1991, 2015).”
Saavedra, L. M., Morgan‐López, A. A., Hien, D. A., Killeen, T. K., Back, S. E., Ruglass, L. M., Fitzpatrick, S., & López‐Castro, T. (2020) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22624 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…as other trials of parent-involvement CBTs accumulate, modern data-harmonization methods, such as meta-analysis of individual patient data and/or propensity score weighting of trial data, provide promising approaches to evaluate the replicability of findings (e.g., Saavedra et al., 2021).”
Lebowitz, E. R., Zilcha‐Mano, S., Orbach, M., Shimshoni, Y., & Silverman, W. K. (2021) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13386 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationSmall sample failure of random assignment: A further examination.
Strube, M. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.2.346 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Patriarca, G. C., Rey, Y., Marin, C. E., Yeguez, C. E., Pettit, J. W., & Silverman, W. K. (2022) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000770 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationErceg-Hurn, D. M., Campbell, B. N. C., & McEvoy, P. M. (2023) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102676 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The simplest explanation is also that there are no true clinically meaningful moderating effects (Erceg-Hurn et al., 2023).”
Moderators and mediators of treatments for youth with anxiety
Herres, J., Cummings, C. M., Swan, A., Makover, H., & Kendall, P. C. (2015) · Moderators and Mediators of Youth Treatment Outcomes · doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780199360345.003.0002 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Small Sample Failure of Random Assignment
Strube, M. (2015) · The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp323 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Given that nonstarter status was not significantly related to any of the variables studied, the imbalance should not affect the results given our sample size (Strube, 1991, 2015).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
- Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S. (2003). Applied multiple correlation/regression analysis for the social sciences. Erlbaum.
- Muthén L. K., Muthén B. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
- Silverman W. K., Albano A. M. (1996). Anxiety disorders interview schedule for children-IV (Child and parent versions). Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Family Accommodation and Separation Anxiety: The Moderating Role of Child Attachment
Weeks, G., Sakmar, E., Clark, T. A., Rose, A. M., Silverman, W. K., & Lebowitz, E. R. (2024) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-024-01705-2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationFalcone, M. M., Bar-Haim, Y., Lebowitz, E. R., Silverman, W., & Pettit, J. W. (2024) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-024-00482-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationSilverman, W. K., & Spencer, S. D. (2025) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-025-01324-y · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“We also recommend further examination of theory-driven putative moderating variables of harm and benefits to move the field closer to optimal personalization of treatment (e.g., Hofmann, 2025; Silverman et al., 2024b).”
Self-citationEvans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0011
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0007
Pleasure and Pain, Rewards and Punishments, Approach and Avoidance
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0004
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0002
Development of Children’s Feelings
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0005
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0009
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0006
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.002.0004
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0001
Interference and Contradictions
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0008
The Challenge of Changing Intense Feelings
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0010
Evans, I. M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.003.0003
Evans, I. M. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197825808.001.0001
Halbreich, E. D. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2025.2521866
- Authors
- Silverman, W. K., Rey, Y., Marin, C. E., Boutris, P., Jaccard, J., & Pettit, J. W.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Florida International University (US)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Silverman, Wendy K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-11-30
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 936-944
- ISSN
- 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-7034
- PMC
- PMC11521139
- OpenAlex
- W4389204487
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079943, R01MH119299)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- parental involvement, youth anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, negative reinforcement, acceptance, psychological control, treatment moderators, precision therapy, parent training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review