Cited by 17Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Boundaries on Parent Involvement in Their Child’s Anxiety Cognitive-Behavioral-Treatment Outcome: Parent Reinforcement and Relationship Behaviors Moderate Outcome

Open access
Silverman, Wendy K., Rey, Yasmin, Marin, Carla E., Boutris, Panagiotis, Jaccard, James, Pettit, Jeremy W.·2024·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

Extending a recent parent-mediation efficacy trial, we identified parent reinforcement and relationship behaviors as setting boundary conditions, or moderators, of youths’ anxiety outcome in 254 youths and their parents, who were randomized to (a) cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) with parent reinforcement-behavior training (CBT + Reinf), (b) CBT with parent relationship-behavior training (CBT + Relat), or (c) individual-youth CBT—a comparator control arm. Findings revealed that parents with high baseline negative-reinforcement levels and acceptance levels (i.e., above the mean) report their children as having lower anxiety at outcome when assigned to CBT + Reinf and CBT + Relat, respectively, versus CBT. No moderation effects were found for either parent positive reinforcement or parent psychological control. Implications for treating anxiety disorders and moving toward precision-treatment approaches in youths and the importance of research replication and extension are discussed. © The Author(s) 2023.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/21677026231209331

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

9 of 33 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premiseown data

    In the Silverman et al. (2022) trial, youths in either CBT with parent involvement arm had lower average anxiety than those in individual youth CBT.

    “Findings revealed that on average youths in either one of the two CBTs with parent involvement had lower anxiety than those in individual youth CBT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silverman et al., 2022 source
  • Premisecitation

    Silverman and colleagues (2022) conducted a comparative randomized clinical trial evaluating two CBT arms with parent involvement and an individual child CBT arm among youths with primary anxiety diagnoses.

    “Silverman and colleagues (2022) conducted a comparative randomized clinical trial to evaluate two CBT arms with parent involvement, and an individual child CBT arm, among youths with primary anxiety diagnoses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silverman et al., 2022 source
  • Premisecitation

    The importance of parent negative reinforcement and parent psychological control in youth anxiety is strongly grounded in theory, research, and clinical practice.

    “The importance of parent negative reinforcement and parent psychological control in youth anxiety is strongly grounded in theory, research, and clinical practice (e.g., Creswell et al., 2020; Ginsburg et al., 1995; McLeod et al., 2007; van der Bruggen et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Creswell et al., 2020 source

      The Development section reports some longitudinal and experimental evidence linking parental overinvolvement or control to child anxiety, and the treatment-components section reports that reductions in parental psychological control mediated outcomes in one form of CBT (pages not provided). The copy does not establish the claimed importance of parent negative reinforcement, and its qualified account of parental control does not support describing both factors as strongly grounded across theory, research, and clinical practice. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ginsburg et al., 1995 source
    • cites McLeod et al., 2007 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Confidence in the moderator findings is enhanced because they are based on a large sample size.

    “Nonetheless, enhanced confidence can be found in our moderator findings because they are based on a large sample size (Silverman et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silverman et al., 2022 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) links sample size to statistical power, noting that detecting some outcomes requires much larger samples. It does not assess the citing authors’ sample or say that a large sample enhances confidence in moderator findings specifically. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    There were no statistically significant baseline differences between treatment nonstarters and youth who began treatment on outcome, moderator, or sociodemographic variables.

    “There were no statistically significant differences between nonstarters and youth who began treatment on any of the outcome and moderator measures, as well as sociodemographic variables (e.g., youth age, sex, ethnicity) as measured at baseline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Training parents to use less negative reinforcement and less psychological control played central roles in their child's anxiety reductions in the Silverman et al. (2022) trial, whereas training parents to use more positive reinforcement and more acceptance did not.

    “Although both perspectives are plausible, we lean toward the behavior-reduction perspective due to Silverman and colleagues’ (2022) other novel findings: Training parents to use less negative reinforcement and less psychological control played central roles in their child’s anxiety reductions. This was not found when parents were trained to use more positive reinforcement and more acceptance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silverman et al., 2022 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Silverman et al. (2022) trial used a dismantling design to examine how parental involvement influences outcome by testing distinct parent components as mediators.

    “In addition to addressing whether either or both of the parent involvement CBTs would enhance outcome compared with individual child CBT, the trial used a dismantling design to address how parental involvement influences outcome by investigating distinct parent components contained within each of the two CBT + parent arms as mediators.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silverman et al., 2022 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Treatment moderator identification has been studied sparingly in randomized trials of youth anxiety disorders.

    “From a precision treatment perspective, this long sought grail – the identification of treatment moderators - has been studied sparingly in youth anxiety disorders randomized trials (e.g., Compton et al., 2014; Lebowitz et al., 2021; Patriarca et al., 2022; Taylor et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Compton et al., 2014 source
    • cites Lebowitz et al., 2021 source
    • cites Patriarca et al., 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Prescribing therapy based on patient baseline characteristics (moderators) to improve treatment efficacy has long been sought in adult and youth clinical psychological science outcome research.

    “The ability to prescribe a therapy on the basis of patient baseline characteristics, referred to as moderators in the literature, to enhance treatment efficacy has long been a holy grail in clinical psychological science outcome research with adults (e.g., Beutler & Clarkin, 1990; McKnight et al., 1984) and children and adolescents (youth) (e.g., Burke & Silverman, 1987; March & Curry, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beutler & Clarkin, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites McKnight et al., 1984 source
    • cites Burke & Silverman, 1987 source

      Semantic Scholar found the cited Burke and Silverman paper but returned no full-text snippets for either of two queries. Its title, “The prescriptive treatment of school refusal,” is consistent with tailoring treatment for youth, but does not establish the broader claim about adult and youth outcome research or baseline moderators. An unscoped search found a related passage in “Predictors and moderators of outcome of psychotherapeutic interventions for mental disorders in adolescents and young adults” (score 0.72); without accessible text from the cited paper, that match is insufficient to establish misattribution. (LLM, conf=0.68)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither parent positive reinforcement (PR) nor parent psychological control (PC) moderated youth anxiety outcome.

    “Neither parent PR nor parent PC moderated outcome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A simplest explanation for null or nonreplicated moderator findings is that no true clinically meaningful moderating effects exist.

    “The simplest explanation is also that there are no true clinically meaningful moderating effects (Erceg-Hurn et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Erceg-Hurn et al., 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Youth baseline anxiety, sex, age, and ethnicity were included as covariates in all moderation analyses.

    “We included youth baseline anxiety scores, sex, age, and ethnicity as covariates in all analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Baseline variation in parenting behaviors may be key for identifying which treatment works for whom and for moving toward precision treatment.

    “Baseline variation may be key for identifying which treatment works for whom to enhance outcome and to move closer toward precision treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Parent psychological control has extensive lineage in the child development literature.

    “Similarly, parent psychological control has extensive and rich lineage in the child development literature (Becker, 1964; Schaefer, 1965).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Becker, 1964

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Schaefer, 1965 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The PRPBI parent psychological control subscale had an omega total of 0.74 and the acceptance subscale had an omega total of 0.79 in this sample.

    “In this sample, omega (ωt) was .74 for PC and .79 for ACC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Treatment manuals were developed to standardize all treatment sessions.

    “Treatment manuals were developed to standardize all treatment sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The parent-report anxiety measure (RCMAS/P) had an omega total of 0.87 in this sample.

    “In this sample, omega (ωt) was 0.87.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The CDQ parent positive reinforcement subscale had an omega total of 0.89 and the negative reinforcement subscale had an omega total of 0.70 in this sample.

    “In this sample, omega (ωt) was 0.89 for PR and .70 for NR.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The observed imbalance in nonstarter proportions across treatment arms was likely due to randomization-related sampling variation and was not large enough to affect outcome analyses.

    “The differential proportions between treatment arms for nonstarters was likely due to sampling imbalance that might be expected via randomization and was not of sufficient size to be consequential for analysis of study outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Missing data bias was assessed by correlating missingness dummy variables with all other variables, and no meaningful bias was observed.

    “Missing data bias was assessed by creating a dummy variable reflecting the presence or absence of missing data for each variable and then correlating it with all other variables. No meaningful bias was observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All parents and youths provided informed consent or assent before participation.

    “All parents and youths provided informed consent/assent prior to participation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was approved by the university's institutional review board.

    “The study was approved by the university’s institutional review board.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Eligible youths were randomly assigned to CBT + Reinf, CBT + Relat, or individual CBT.

    “Eligible youths were randomly assigned to CBT + Reinf, CBT + Relat, and CBT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Parent psychological control conveys to children that they cannot handle new, challenging, or anxiety-provoking situations, thereby limiting child autonomy in those situations.

    “Parent psychological control conveys to their children that they are unable to handle new, challenging, or anxiety-provoking situations, limiting child autonomy in these situations (Hudson & Rapee, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hudson & Rapee, 2004
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Developmental disabilities, psychosis, or current involvement in another psychosocial treatment were exclusion criteria.

    “Developmental disabilities, psychosis, or current involvement in another psychosocial treatment were exclusion criteria.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    The finding that parent-involvement CBTs outperformed individual CBT is novel and important given inconsistent prior data on whether parent involvement enhances child anxiety CBT outcome.

    “These are novel and important findings given the lack of consistent data showing that parent involvement in their child’s CBT enhances anxiety outcome (e.g., Kendall et al., 2008; Nauta et al., 2003; Peris et al., 2021; Silverman et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kendall et al., 2008 source
    • cites Nauta et al., 2003 source
    • cites Peris et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Missing data were handled using full-information maximum-likelihood estimation.

    “Missing data were accommodated using full-information maximum-likelihood (FIML) estimation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The association between a treatment and its outcome measure could depend on countless variables, and investigating all possible candidate moderators is onerous.

    “Moreover, from a grail half empty perspective, the latter conclusion overlooks two decades’ old clinical trials literature that the association between a treatment and that treatment’s outcome measure(s) could depend on countless variables and investigating all possible candidate variables as moderators is onerous (Kazdin, 2001; Kraemer et al., 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kazdin, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kraemer et al., 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    For families with high baseline parent negative reinforcement, training parents in reinforcement behaviors including reducing negative reinforcement yields better outcome; for families with high baseline parent acceptance, training parents in relationship behaviors including enhancing acceptance yields better outcome.

    “Our findings indicate, however, that to either reduce or enhance (that is the question) depends on the specific parent behavior and their respective boundary conditions; for families where parent negative reinforcement is high, treatment aimed at training parents in reinforcement behaviors, including reducing negative reinforcement behaviors, results in better outcome. For families where parent”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The generalizability of the findings from this efficacy trial is unclear, and replication and extension to community settings are needed.

    “Another study limitation is the unclear generalizability of our findings from this efficacy trial and the need to replicate and extend them to community settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Parental involvement does not always enhance treatment effect; whether it helps depends on the parent behavior targeted and the baseline characteristics of the parent being targeted.

    “The upshot is: parental involvement does not always enhance treatment effect because it depends on what is targeted and who is being targeted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The sample was predominantly mothers and Hispanic/Latino, so it is important to evaluate whether findings generalize to populations that include fathers.

    “Further, because our large sample comprised predominately mothers and Hispanics/Latinos (a notable study strength), it will be important to evaluate the extent our findings generalize to other populations that also comprise fathers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The study identifies parent acceptance and parent negative reinforcement as significant moderators of youth anxiety outcome in two different CBT + parent arms, with their respective boundary conditions.

    “Our study identifies parent behaviors that significantly moderate treatment outcome, and their respective boundary conditions, in two different CBT + parent arms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A study limitation is reliance on questionnaire data.

    “One limitation is reliance on questionnaire data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The pattern of two parent variables moderating and two not moderating suggests a precision-treatment path for parent acceptance and negative reinforcement, while no precision approach is needed for parent psychological control and positive reinforcement.

    “This is because the findings suggest a precision treatment path that could apply for parent acceptance and parent negative reinforcement (because they were found to moderate), while there is no need to apply a precision treatment approach for levels of parent psychological control and parent positive reinforcement (because they were found not to moderate).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Parents differ at baseline in how much they use reinforcement and relationship behaviors.

    “However, such a scenario seems implausible; a more plausible scenario is that parents vary at baseline in their use of reinforcement and relationship behaviors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Between 40 and 50 percent of families have a child who did not benefit from anxiety CBTs.

    “It may not be a reasonable conclusion, however, if one is among the 40 to 50 percent of families whose child did not benefit from anxiety CBTs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no literature as robust as that for negative reinforcement and psychological control regarding parent use of positive reinforcement and acceptance.

    “There is no parallel literature as robust with regard to parent use of positive reinforcement and acceptance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Avoidance of feared stimuli is negatively reinforced by short-term reduction of aversive fear or anxiety, which maintains continued fear and avoidance.

    “Indeed, that an organism’s avoidance of feared stimuli is negatively reinforced through the short-term reduction of aversive states (fear; anxiety), which serves to maintain continued fear and avoidance of stimuli is not new or controversial.”
4 of 4

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentz = -2.76reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .006

    “z = −2.76, p = .006”

  • Consistentz = -2.32reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .020

    “z = −2.32, p = .02”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Negative-reinforcement benefit is described with a lower cutoff than the reported boundary

    Minor

    The discussion describes the lower-anxiety outcome as applying when baseline negative reinforcement is above its mean of 40.82. The results report a significant treatment difference only for scores above 44, not for the entire above-mean range.

  • Acceptance benefit is described with a lower cutoff than the reported boundary

    Minor

    The discussion describes the lower-anxiety outcome as applying when baseline acceptance is above its mean of 16.70. The results report a significant treatment difference only for scores above 19, leaving scores between the mean and 19 outside the stated region of significance.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
  2. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S. (2003). Applied multiple correlation/regression analysis for the social sciences. Erlbaum.
  3. Muthén L. K., Muthén B. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
  4. Silverman W. K., Albano A. M. (1996). Anxiety disorders interview schedule for children-IV (Child and parent versions). Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverman, W. K., Rey, Y., Marin, C. E., Boutris, P., Jaccard, J., & Pettit, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Florida International University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Silverman, Wendy K.
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2023-11-30
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
936-944
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W4389204487
Cited by
17
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079943, R01MH119299)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
parental involvement, youth anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, negative reinforcement, acceptance, psychological control, treatment moderators, precision therapy, parent training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review