Cited by 57Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Family Intervention for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: A Meta-Analytic Review of Therapy Targets, Techniques, and Outcomes

Peris, Tara S., Thamrin, Hardian, Rozenman, Michelle S.·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Parent- and family-level correlates of youth anxiety are well-documented, and they highlight potential targets for family-focused intervention. Although family-based approaches for treating youth anxiety generally are considered efficacious for achieving symptom reduction, they vary in format and approach and it remains unclear whether they offer an advantage over individual child treatment. To better understand the current state of the evidence, we used meta-analytic methods to examine the therapeutic approaches described in existing family interventions for child and adolescent anxiety, whether they mapped to the major mechanisms proposed in the literature, and the timeline along which relevant parent/family variables were measured. We examined how these mechanism-focused family interventions performed in RCTs relative to individual child CBT and whether they shifted symptoms and relevant parenting behaviors. A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared individual cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) to CBT+ a family component (CBT + FAM) and included a youth anxiety measure at pre- and post-treatment; only half of these (n=6) also included a parent/family functioning measure at both pre- and post-treatment (across both primary and secondary outcome papers). Only a single study included anxiety measures at a mid-treatment time point, and none included parent measures at a mid-treatment time point. Findings are discussed in terms of design considerations and advancing the field of family intervention for youth anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.053

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peris, T. S., Thamrin, H., & Rozenman, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Peris, Tara S.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
286
Pages
282-295
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135427460
Cited by
57
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-08-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
family intervention, childhood anxiety, adolescent anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, family-focused therapy, parental behavior, family functioning, therapeutic mechanisms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Humans, Parents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review