Cited by 211Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesSport Psychology and PerformanceFoot and Ankle Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale

Open access
Webster, Kate E., Feller, Julian A.·2018·Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale was developed to measure an athlete’s psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction surgery. The scale is being used with increasing frequency in both research and clinical settings. Purpose: To generate and validate a short version of the ACL-RSI scale. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The ACL-RSI scale was administered to 535 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction surgery. Reliability (Cronbach alpha) was determined and factor analysis of the full scale was undertaken along with a process of item selection and elimination. A second group of 250 patients participated in a predictive validation analysis. This group completed the ACL-RSI scale at 6 months and reported return-to-sport outcomes 12 months following ACL reconstruction surgery. The predictive validity of both scales (full and short versions) was assessed by use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics. Results: The scale was found to have high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, 0.96), which suggested that item redundancy was present. After an item selection process, the scale was reduced to a 6-item format. Cronbach alpha for the short version was 0.92, and factor analysis confirmed the presence of 1 factor accounting for 71% of the total variance. Scores for the short version were significantly different between patients who had and those who had not returned to sport. Six-month ACL-RSI scores for both the full and short versions had fair to good predictive ability for 12-month return-to-sport outcomes (full version: area under ROC curve, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.7-0.8]; short version: area under ROC curve, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.7-0.8]). Conclusion: A 6-item short version of the ACL-RSI scale was developed from a large cohort of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. The short version appears to be as robust as the full version for discriminating between and predicting return-to-sport outcomes. The short version of the ACL-RSI may be of use in busy clinical settings to help identify athletes who may find return to sport challenging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2325967118763763

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The selected time window (3-12 months post-ACLR) reflects a critical period in rehabilitation where patients are commonly assessed for return-to-activity decisions.

    “The selected time window (3–12 months post-ACLR) reflects a critical period in rehabilitation where patients are commonly assessed for return-to-activity decisions.”

    From Biopsychosocial profiles following ACL reconstruction: A latent class analysis of barriers to return-to-activity (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Methods (Participants; page unavailable) describe criteria for running at 12 weeks, noncontact training at 6 months, and return to play at 9 months. The Methods (Procedures and Analysis; page unavailable) also assess psychological readiness at 6 months and return-to-sport status at 12 months. These passages support the relevance of the 3–12-month window in this study, but do not establish that patients are commonly assessed throughout that window or explicitly characterize it as a critical rehabilitation period. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ACL-RSI and TSK-11 are commonly used to assess psychological readiness and kinesiophobia after ACL reconstruction, respectively.

    “The Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport After Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) and the TSK-11 are commonly used to assess psychological readiness and kinesiophobia after ACLR, respectively (Woby et al., 2005; Webster et al., 2008; Webster and Feller, 2018; Cirrincione et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1053/j.otsm.2015.09.006 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/0363546513489284 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1136/bjsm.2010.076364 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/s00167-014-2942-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183095 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091786 · DOI · Paper page
  7. DeVellis R, 1991, Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 26
  8. 10.1007/s00167-013-2699-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094850 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00167-016-4246-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s00167-016-4288-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1123/jsr.5.4.293 · DOI
  13. 10.1123/jsr.7.3.206 · DOI
  14. Kvist J, 2013, Scand J Med Sci Sports, 23, 568, 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01438.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1136/bjsm.2007.044818 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s11999-016-4718-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00167-014-3261-5 · DOI
  19. Müller U, 2014, Sports Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 30, 135, 10.1016/j.orthtr.2014.01.009 · DOI
  20. 10.1123/tsp.2014-0063 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/10413209908404201 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.09.006 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/02640414.2016.1167230 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/sms.12010 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/03635465990270021701 · DOI
  27. 10.1097/00003086-200004000-00022 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Webster, K. E., & Feller, J. A.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Epworth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Webster, Kate E.
Venue
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
2325967118763763-2325967118763763
ISSN
2325-9671 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796121079
Cited by
211
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • La Trobe University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
ACL-RSI scale, anterior cruciate ligament injury, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, return to sport, psychological readiness, short-form scale development, scale validation, predictive validity, athletes, psychometric properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review