Cited by 523Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsProtein Degradation and InhibitorsBone health and treatments

A randomized phase 2 study of lenalidomide therapy for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Open access
Richardson, Paul G., Blood, Emily, Mitsiades, Constantine S., Jagannath, Sundar, Zeldenrust, Steven R., Alsina, Melissa, Schlossman, Robert L., Rajkumar, S. Vincent +18 more·2006·Blood

Abstract

This multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study evaluated 2 dose regimens of lenalidomide for relapsed, refractory myeloma. Seventy patients were randomized to receive either 30 mg once-daily or 15 mg twice-daily oral lenalidomide for 21 days of every 28-day cycle. Patients with progressive or stable disease after 2 cycles received dexamethasone. Analysis of the first 70 patients showed increased grade 3/4 myelo-suppression in patients receiving 15 mg twice daily (41% versus 13%, P = .03). An additional 32 patients received 30 mg once daily. Responses were evaluated according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. Overall response rate (complete, partial, or minor) to lenalidomide alone was 25% (24% for once-daily and 29% for twice-daily lenalidomide). Median overall survival in 30-mg once-daily and twice-daily groups was 28 and 27 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months on once-daily versus 3.9 months on twice-daily lenalidomide (P = .2). Dexamethasone was added in 68 patients and 29% responded. Time to first occurrence of clinically significant grade 3/4 myelosuppression was shorter in the twice-daily group (1.8 vs 5.5 months, P = .05). Significant peripheral neuropathy and deep vein thrombosis each occurred in only 3%. Lenalidomide is active and well tolerated in relapsed, refractory myeloma, with the 30-mg once-daily regimen providing the basis for future studies as monotherapy and with dexamethasone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2006-04-015909

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. Cancer statis- tics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:8-29.
  2. Hideshima T, Anderson KC. Molecular mecha- nisms of novel therapeutic approaches for mul- tiple myeloma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:927-937.
  3. Davies FE, Raje N, Hideshima T, et al. Thalido- mide and immunomodulatory derivatives aug- ment natural killer cell cytotoxicity in multiple my- eloma. Blood. 2001;98:210-216.
  4. Zangari M, Tricot G, Zeldis J, Eddlemon P, Saghafifar F, Barlogie B. Results of a phase I study of CC-5013 for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who relapse after high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) [abstract]. Blood. 2001; 98:775a.
  5. Weber DM, Chen C, Niesvizky R, et al. A multi- center, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone in previously treated subjects with multiple myeloma [abstract]. Haematologica. 2005;90:155.
  6. Rajkumar SV, Hayman SR, Lacy MQ, et al. Com- bination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexa- methasone (Rev/Dex) for newly diagnosed my- eloma. Blood. 2005;106:4050-4053.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, P. G., Blood, E., Mitsiades, C. S., Jagannath, S., Zeldenrust, S. R., Alsina, M., Schlossman, R. L., Rajkumar, S. V., Desikan, K. R., Hideshima, T., Munshi, N. C., Kelly-Colson, K., Doss, D., McKenney, M. L., Gorelik, S., Warren, D., Freeman, A., Rich, R., Wu, A., Olesnyckyj, M., Wride, K., Dalton, W. S., Zeldis, J., Knight, R., Weller, E., & Anderson, K. C.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Blood
Published
2006-11-15
Volume
108
Issue
10
Pages
3458-3464
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2060496777
Cited by
523
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 42
FWCI
41.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
  • Celgene
  • National Institutes of Health (CA100707)
  • National Cancer Institute (P0-1 CA78373, R01- CA50947, P50CA100707, R01CA050947)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
lenalidomide, relapsed multiple myeloma, refractory multiple myeloma, dose comparison, myelosuppression, dexamethasone combination therapy, progression-free survival, overall response rate, drug toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, deep vein thrombosis
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Thalidomide, Survival Rate, Survival Analysis, Salvage Therapy, Venous Thrombosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review