Cited by 57Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Participant experiences of mindfulness-based childbirth education: a qualitative study

Open access
Fisher, Colleen, Hauck, Yvonne, Bayes, Sara, Byrne, Jean·2012·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Childbirth is an important transitional life event, but one in which many women are dissatisfied stemming in part from a sense that labour is something that happens to them rather than with them. Promoting maternal satisfaction with childbirth means equipping women with communication and decision making skills that will enhance their ability to feel involved in their labour. Additionally, traditional antenatal education does not necessarily prepare expectant mothers and their birth support partner adequately for birth. Mindfulness-based interventions appear to hold promise in addressing these issues. Mindfulness-based Child Birth Education (MBCE) was a pilot intervention combining skills-based antenatal education and Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction. Participant experiences of MBCE, both of expectant mothers and their birth support partners are the focus of this article. METHODS: A generic qualitative approach was utilised for this study. Pregnant women between 18 and 28 weeks gestation, over 18 years of age, nulliparous with singleton pregnancies and not taking medication for a diagnosed mental illness or taking illicit drugs were eligible to undertake the MBCE program which was run in a metropolitan city in Australia. Focus groups with 12 mothers and seven birth support partners were undertaken approximately four months after the completion of MBCE. Audio recordings of the groups were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using the method of constant comparison by all four authors independently and consensus on analysis and interpretation arrived at through team meetings. RESULTS: A sense of both 'empowerment' and 'community' were the essences of the experiences of MBCE both for mothers and their birth support partner and permeated the themes of 'awakening my existing potential' and 'being in a community of like-minded parents'. Participants suggested that mindfulness techniques learned during MBCE facilitated their sense of control during birth, and the content and pedagogical approach of MBCE enabled them to be involved in decision making during the birth. The pedagogical approach also fostered a sense of community among participants which extended into the postnatal period. CONCLUSIONS: MBCE has the potential to empower women to become active participants in the birthing process, thus addressing common concerns regarding lack of control and satisfaction with labour and facilitate peer support into the postnatal period. Further education of health professionals may be needed to ensure that they respond positively to those women and birth support partners who remain active in decision making during birth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2393-12-126

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Glaser BG Theoretical Sensitivity 1978 Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press
  2. Snowden A Martin C Jomeem J Hollins Martin C Concurrent analysis of choice and control in childbirth BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011 11 40 50 10.1186/1471-2393-11-40 21631910 PMC3123250 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, C., Hauck, Y., Bayes, S., & Byrne, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Colleen
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2012-11-13
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
126-126
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154169371
Cited by
55
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, prenatal education, maternal empowerment, peer support, nulliparous women
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Parents, Power, Psychological, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Stress, Psychological, Patient Satisfaction, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Parturition, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review