Cited by 23Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Trait mindfulness during pregnancy and perception of childbirth

Open access
Hulsbosch, Lianne P., Boekhorst, Myrthe G. B. M., Potharst, Eva S., Pop, Victor J. M., Nyklíček, Ivan·2021·Archives of Women s Mental Health

Abstract

Women's subjective childbirth experience is a risk factor for postpartum depression and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress symptoms. Subjective childbirth experience is influenced not only by characteristics of the childbirth itself but also by maternal characteristics. A maternal characteristic that may be associated with a more positive childbirth experience is trait mindfulness. The current study aimed to assess this association and to assess whether trait mindfulness during pregnancy had a moderating role in the possible association between non-spontaneous delivery and perception of childbirth. A subsample of 486 women, participating in a longitudinal prospective cohort study (Holistic Approach to Pregnancy and the first Postpartum Year study), completed the Three Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form at 22 weeks of pregnancy. Women completed the Childbirth Perception Scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale between 7 and 21 days postpartum. The mindfulness facets acting with awareness and non-reacting were significantly associated with a more positive perception of childbirth, after adjusting for covariates. Moderation analyses showed a significant interaction between acting with awareness and non-spontaneous delivery and non-judging and non-spontaneous delivery. Non-spontaneous delivery was associated with a more negative perception of childbirth for low/medium scores of acting with awareness and non-judging, but not for high scores on these mindfulness facets. Trait mindfulness during pregnancy may enhance a positive perception of childbirth. Because this is among the first studies examining the association between maternal dispositional mindfulness and perception of childbirth, future research is needed to confirm the results of the current study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-020-01062-8

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness functioning helps deal with mindwandering and external distraction, maintaining a better level of positive mood and a lower level of negative mood.

    “One of the processes of MT is that mindfulness functioning could help to deal with mindwandering and external distraction for maintaining a better level of positive mood and a lower level of negative mood [32,33].”

    From Acceptance Mindfulness-Trait as a Protective Factor for Post-Natal Depression: A Preliminary Research (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links present-moment attention with coping during childbirth and describes distraction as associated with a less positive birth experience. It does not address mind-wandering or show that mindfulness maintains higher positive mood and lower negative mood; its reported outcome is perception of childbirth. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hulsbosch, L. P., Boekhorst, M. G. B. M., Potharst, E. S., Pop, V. J. M., & Nyklíček, I.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Hulsbosch, Lianne P.
Venue
Archives of Women s Mental Health
Published
2020-09-08
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
281-292
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W3085627019
Cited by
23
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Tilburg University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
trait mindfulness, pregnancy, childbirth perception, postpartum depression, posttraumatic stress symptoms, acting with awareness, non-judgment, moderating effect, maternal characteristics
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Perception, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Parturition, Postpartum Period, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review