Cited by 111Innovations in Medical EducationVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Using cognitive theory to facilitate medical education

Open access
Qiao, Yu Qi, Shen, Jun, Liang, Xiao, Ding, Song, Chen, Fang Yuan, Shao, Li, Zheng, Qing, Ran, Zhi Hua·2014·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Educators continue to search for better strategies for medical education. Although the unifying theme of reforms was "increasing interest in, attention to, and understanding of the knowledge base structures", it is difficult to achieve all these aspects via a single type of instruction. METHODS: We used related key words to search in Google Scholar and Pubmed. Related search results on this topic were selected for discussion. RESULTS: Despite the range of different methods used in medical education, students are still required to memorize much of what they are taught, especially for the basic sciences. Subjects like anatomy and pathology carry a high intrinsic cognitive load mainly because of the large volume of information that must be retained. For these subjects, decreasing cognitive load is not feasible and memorizing appears to be the only strategy, yet the cognitive load makes learning a challenge for many students. Cognitive load is further increased when inappropriate use of educational methods occurs, e.g., in problem based learning which demands clinical reasoning, a high level and complex cognitive skill. It is widely known that experts are more skilled at clinical reasoning than novices because of their accumulated experiences. These experiences are based on the formation of cognitive schemata. In this paper we describe the use of cognitive schemata, developed by experts as worked examples to facilitate medical students' learning and to promote their clinical reasoning. CONCLUSION: We suggest that cognitive load theory can provide a useful framework for understanding the challenges and successes associated with education of medical professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6920-14-79

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barrows HS How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years 1985 New York: Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiao, Y. Q., Shen, J., Liang, X., Ding, S., Chen, F. Y., Shao, L., Zheng, Q., & Ran, Z. H.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ran, Zhi Hua
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2014-04-14
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
79-79
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136692330
Cited by
111
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Chinese Medical Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
cognitive load theory, cognitive schemas, worked examples, clinical reasoning, medical education, problem-based learning, memorization, expert-novice differences, anatomy education, pathology education
MeSH terms
Cognition, Education, Medical, Humans, Learning, Psychological Theory, Teaching, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review