The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: We have witnessed a rapid increase in the use of Web-based 'collaborationware' in recent years. These Web 2.0 applications, particularly wikis, blogs and podcasts, have been increasingly adopted by many online health-related professional and educational services. Because of their ease of use and rapidity of deployment, they offer the opportunity for powerful information sharing and ease of collaboration. Wikis are Web sites that can be edited by anyone who has access to them. The word 'blog' is a contraction of 'Web Log' - an online Web journal that can offer a resource rich multimedia environment. Podcasts are repositories of audio and video materials that can be "pushed" to subscribers, even without user intervention. These audio and video files can be downloaded to portable media players that can be taken anywhere, providing the potential for "anytime, anywhere" learning experiences (mobile learning). DISCUSSION: Wikis, blogs and podcasts are all relatively easy to use, which partly accounts for their proliferation. The fact that there are many free and Open Source versions of these tools may also be responsible for their explosive growth. Thus it would be relatively easy to implement any or all within a Health Professions' Educational Environment. Paradoxically, some of their disadvantages also relate to their openness and ease of use. With virtually anybody able to alter, edit or otherwise contribute to the collaborative Web pages, it can be problematic to gauge the reliability and accuracy of such resources. While arguably, the very process of collaboration leads to a Darwinian type 'survival of the fittest' content within a Web page, the veracity of these resources can be assured through careful monitoring, moderation, and operation of the collaborationware in a closed and secure digital environment. Empirical research is still needed to build our pedagogic evidence base about the different aspects of these tools in the context of medical/health education. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: If effectively deployed, wikis, blogs and podcasts could offer a way to enhance students', clinicians' and patients' learning experiences, and deepen levels of learners' engagement and collaboration within digital learning environments. Therefore, research should be conducted to determine the best ways to integrate these tools into existing e-Learning programmes for students, health professionals and patients, taking into account the different, but also overlapping, needs of these three audience classes and the opportunities of virtual collaboration between them. Of particular importance is research into novel integrative applications, to serve as the "glue" to bind the different forms of Web-based collaborationware synergistically in order to provide a coherent wholesome learning experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Giles, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/438900a · Cited by 1,978
Media will never influence learning
Clark, R. E. (1994) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299088 · Cited by 1,893
Cited by
Defining Internet-Supported Therapeutic Interventions
Barak, A., Klein, B., & Proudfoot, J. G. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9130-7 · Cited by 731
Vollmar, H. C., Mayer, H., Ostermann, T., Butzlaff, M. E., Sandars, J. E., Wilm, S., & Rieger, M. A. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-1 · Cited by 693
Health Literacy and Use and Trust in Health Information.
Chen, X., Hay, J. L., Waters, E. A., Kiviniemi, M. T., Biddle, C., Schofield, E., Li, Y., Kaphingst, K., & Orom, H. (2018) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1511658 · Cited by 548
Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students
Chretien, K. C. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1387 · Cited by 448
YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education
Jaffar, A. A. (2012) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1268 · Cited by 360
Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education
Aljawarneh, S. A. (2020) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0 · Cited by 333
How Web 2.0 is changing medicine
Giustini, D. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39062.555405.80 · Cited by 315
Paige, S. R., Krieger, J. L., & Stellefson, M. L. (2017) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1250846 · Cited by 300
Giustini, D. M., Ali, S. M., Fraser, M., & Boulos, M. N. K. (2018) · Online Journal of Public Health Informatics · doi:10.5210/ojphi.v10i2.8270 · Cited by 271
Self-citationContent of Weblogs Written by Health Professionals
Lagu, T., Kaufman, E. J., Asch, D. A., & Armstrong, K. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0726-6 · Cited by 255
Adams, S. A. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.006 · Cited by 244
Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: Tensions and Controversies in the Field
Hughes, B., Joshi, I., & Wareham, J. (2008) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1056 · Cited by 221
Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey
Sandars, J., & Schroter, S. (2007) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.2007.063123 · Cited by 219
How we use social media to supplement a novel curriculum in medical education
Bahner, D. P., Adkins, E., Patel, N., Donley, C., Nagel, R., & Kman, N. E. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.668245 · Cited by 189
Nijland, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E., Kelders, S. M., Brandenburg, B. J., & Seydel, E. R. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1603 · Cited by 175
Social media use by physicians: a qualitative study of the new frontier of medicine
Campbell, L., Evans, Y., Pumper, M., & Moreno, M. A. (2016) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0327-y · Cited by 135
Diagnosis Blog: Checking Up on Health Blogs in the Blogosphere
Miller, E. A., & Pole, A. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.175125 · Cited by 129
Adams, S. A. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.009 · Cited by 97
Deriving a typology of Web 2.0 learning technologies
Bower, M. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12344 · Cited by 56
Patient-focused Internet interventions in reproductive medicine: a scoping review
Aarts, J. W. M., van den Haak, P., Nelen, W. L. D. M., Tuil, W. S., Faber, M. J., & Kremer, J. A. M. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr045 · Cited by 52
Taveira-Gomes, T., Prado-Costa, R., Severo, M., & Ferreira, M. A. (2015) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-014-0275-0 · Cited by 39
Pediatric Clerkship Directors’ Social Networking Use and Perceptions of Online Professionalism
Kind, T., Greysen, S. R., & Chretien, K. C. (2012) · Academic Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2011.12.003 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Boulos, M. N. K., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Education
- Published
- 2006-08-15
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-41
- ISSN
- 1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124713896
- Cited by
- 1,159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 296.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.