Cited by 129COVID-19 and Mental HealthDisaster Response and ManagementResilience and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computer-assisted resilience training to prepare healthcare workers for pandemic influenza: a randomized trial of the optimal dose of training

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Working in a hospital during an extraordinary infectious disease outbreak can cause significant stress and contribute to healthcare workers choosing to reduce patient contact. Psychological training of healthcare workers prior to an influenza pandemic may reduce stress-related absenteeism, however, established training methods that change behavior and attitudes are too resource-intensive for widespread use. This study tests the feasibility and effectiveness of a less expensive alternative - an interactive, computer-assisted training course designed to build resilience to the stresses of working during a pandemic. METHODS: A "dose-finding" study compared pre-post changes in three different durations of training. We measured variables that are likely to mediate stress-responses in a pandemic before and after training: confidence in support and training, pandemic-related self-efficacy, coping style and interpersonal problems. RESULTS: 158 hospital workers took the course and were randomly assigned to the short (7 sessions, median cumulative duration 111 minutes), medium (12 sessions, 158 minutes) or long (17 sessions, 223 minutes) version. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, the course was associated with significant improvements in confidence in support and training, pandemic self-efficacy and interpersonal problems. Participants who under-utilized coping via problem-solving or seeking support or over-utilized escape-avoidance experienced improved coping. Comparison of doses showed improved interpersonal problems in the medium and long course but not in the short course. There was a trend towards higher drop-out rates with longer duration of training. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted resilience training in healthcare workers appears to be of significant benefit and merits further study under pandemic conditions. Comparing three "doses" of the course suggested that the medium course was optimal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-10-72

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Recruitment and participation flowchart.
Figure 1 Recruitment and participation flowchart.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. United Kingdom Department of Health: UK Health Departments' Influenza Pandemic Contingency Plan. 2005, accessed Oct 6, 2006, [ http://www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/influenza/pandemic/fluplan.htm ]
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care: Ontario Health Plan for an Influenza Pandemic. 2006, accessed Oct 6, 2006, [ http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/emu/pan_flu/pan_flu_plan.html ]
  3. Toronto Academic Health Sciences Network: Pandemic Influenza Planning Guidelines. 2006, accessed Mar 11, 2010, [ http://www.baycrest.org/Family_Information/Pandemic_Information/TAHSNGuidelines.pdf ]
  4. Belcher J, Vonderhaar K: Web-delivered research-based nursing staff education for seeking Magnet Status. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2005, 35: 332-338. 10.1097/00005110-200509000-00004. · DOI
  5. Leszcz M: Group psychological perspectives on staff coping with SARS. 2004, New York: American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting
  6. Horowitz LM, Alden LE, Wiggins JS, Pincus AL: Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Manual. 2000, The Psychological Corporation
  7. Folkman S, Lazarus RS: Ways of Coping Questionnaire Manual. 1988, Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Maunder, R. G., Lancee, W. J., Mae, R., Vincent, L., Peladeau, N., Beduz, M. A., Hunter, J. J., & Leszcz, M.
Affiliations
Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Maunder, Robert G
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2010-03-22
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
72-72
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008615047
Cited by
129
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (83139_1, 83139)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
computer-based training, resilience training, healthcare workers, pandemic influenza, occupational stress, self-efficacy, coping styles, interpersonal problems, training dose, hospital staff, absenteeism
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adaptation, Psychological, Canada, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Curriculum, Disaster Planning, Humans, Influenza, Human, Personnel, Hospital, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Intention to Treat Analysis, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review