Cited by 45COVID-19 and Mental HealthMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Promoting resilience in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic with a brief online intervention

Open access
DeTore, N.R., Sylvia, L., Park, E.R., Burke, A., Levison, J.H., Shannon, A., Choi, K.W., Jain, F.A. +5 more·2022·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Introduction The psychological wellbeing of healthcare workers has been impacted by the high levels of stress many have experienced during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a brief online course focused on introducing evidence-based skills that could increase resilience and decreases emotional distress in healthcare workers during the pandemic.Materials and methods Employees of a large healthcare system completed a mental health survey at baseline, and then one month and two months after some employees participated in an online resilience-enhancement course consisting of three 12-19 min videos focused on mindfulness, mentalization, and self-compassion.Results A total of 554 participants completed the baseline survey, endorsing moderate to high levels of emotional distress. Of those who completed all three assessments and participated in the course (n = 38), significant improvements in resilience and reductions in emotional distress were found one and two months later, in comparison to those who did not participate in the course (n = 110).Discussion These findings suggest that a brief, online intervention can improve the mental health of healthcare workers during a crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.11.011

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It was demonstrated in this review that psychoeducation is a way to improve mental health.

    “It was also demonstrated in this review that psychoeducation is a way to improve mental health (29, 34, 41, 44, 45, 51, 55).”

    From Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Methods (Resilience training course; page unavailable) describe an online course with didactic materials and skills exercises, and the Abstract (Results; page unavailable) reports improved resilience and reduced emotional distress among participating healthcare workers. The study evaluated the combined course, not psychoeducation alone, so it does not establish that psychoeducation independently improves mental health. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In included studies, resilience was linked to emotional distress and empathy.

    “Resilience was also linked emotional distress (34) and empathy (32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Maslach C. Jackson S. Leiter M. Schaufeli W. Schwab R. Maslach Burnout Inventory vol. 21 1986 Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeTore, N. R., Sylvia, L., Park, E. R., Burke, A., Levison, J. H., Shannon, A., Choi, K. W., Jain, F. A., Coman, D. C., Herman, J., Perlis, R., Fava, M., & Holt, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
DeTore, N.R.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
146
Pages
228-233
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3212026836
Cited by
45
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD096369)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
resilience, healthcare workers, COVID-19 pandemic, online intervention, mindfulness, mentalization, self-compassion, emotional distress, psychological well-being, feasibility and acceptability, mental health interventions
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Self-Compassion, Health Personnel, Humans, Resilience, Psychological, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review