Cited by 359Urban Transport and AccessibilityObesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and Health

Parents' perceptions of neighborhood safety and children's physical activity

Weir, Lori A., Etelson, Debra, Brand, Donald A.·2006·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective The obesity epidemic disproportionately affects minority and poor children. Negative perceptions of neighborhood safety in poor communities may affect overweight by inhibiting children's physical activity. This study investigates the degree to which parents in a poor inner city vs. a middle-class suburban community limit their children's outdoor activity because of neighborhood safety concerns.Method Parents of children aged 5-10 years from an inner city family practice in a poor community and from a suburban pediatric practice in a middle-class community completed a 20-item questionnaire. Parents estimated the amount of their child's activity in various situations and indicated their level of anxiety concerning gangs, child aggression, crime, traffic, and personal safety in their neighborhood.Results Inner city children (n = 204) engaged in less physical activity than suburban children (N = 103) (P < 0.001). Inner city parents expressed much greater anxiety about neighborhood safety than suburban parents (P < 0.0001). In the inner city population, children's physical activity levels were negatively correlated with parental anxiety about neighborhood safety (r = -0.18, P < 0.05).Conclusions Inner city parents have high levels of anxiety about neighborhood safety. While these concerns may not entirely explain the discrepancy in activity levels between inner city and suburban children, a safe environment is crucial to increasing opportunities for physical activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.024

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There may be enormous disparities in access to online/active opportunities based on household financial considerations, digital technology access, house and yard size, and neighborhood safety and traffic volume.

    “However, there may be enormous disparities in access to these opportunities based on household financial considerations, digital technology access, house and yard size, and neighborhood safety and traffic volume [7–11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weir, L. A., Etelson, D., & Brand, D. A.
Affiliations
New York Medical College (US)
Corresponding author
Weir, Lori A.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
212-217
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045790515
Cited by
359
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
57.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (2D54 HP 00022)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
neighborhood safety, children's physical activity, parental attitudes, inner-city neighborhoods, suburbs, childhood obesity, parental anxiety, socioeconomic status
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Crime, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, New York, Parents, Poverty, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residence Characteristics, Safety, Suburban Population, Urban Population, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review