The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Animal-assisted therapy with farm animals for persons with psychiatric disorders: effects on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life, a randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The benefits of Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) for humans with mental disorders have been well-documented using cats and dogs, but there is a complete lack of controlled studies using farm animals as therapeutic agents for psychiatric patients. The study was developed in the context of Green care, a concept that involves the use of farm animals, plants, gardens, or the landscape in recreational or work-related interventions for different target groups of clients in cooperation with health authorities. The present study aimed at examining effects of a 12-week intervention with farm animals on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life among adult psychiatric patients with a variety of psychiatric diagnoses. METHODS: The study was a randomized controlled trial and follow-up. Ninety patients (59 women and 31 men) with schizophrenia, affective disorders, anxiety, and personality disorders completed questionnaires to assess self-efficacy (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale; GSE), coping ability (Coping Strategies Scale), and quality of life (Quality of Life Scale; QOLS-N) before, at the end of intervention, and at six months follow-up. Two-thirds of the patients (N = 60) were given interventions; the remaining served as controls. RESULTS: There was significant increase in self-efficacy in the treatment group but not in the control group from before intervention (SB) to six months follow-up (SSMA), (SSMA-SB; F1,55 = 4.20, p= 0.05) and from end of intervention (SA) to follow-up (SSMA-SA; F1,55 = 5.6, p= 0.02). There was significant increase in coping ability within the treatment group between before intervention and follow-up (SSMA-SB = 2.7, t = 2.31, p = 0.03), whereas no changes in quality of life was found. There were no significant changes in any of the variables during the intervention. CONCLUSION: AAT with farm animals may have positive influences on self-efficacy and coping ability among psychiatric patients with long lasting psychiatric symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three studies administered follow-up assessments, which demonstrated that the novelty effects associated with AAI may have been short-lived.
“three studies administered follow-up assessments (Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008;Berget et al. 2011;Pedersen et al. 2012), which demonstrated that the novelty effects associated with aaI may have been short-lived.”
From A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Psychosocial Outcomes (2015) · cites this paper as Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008
The study administered a six-month follow-up, but its Results report higher self-efficacy at follow-up than both baseline and the end of the intervention. The Discussion describes a delayed effect, not a short-lived novelty effect. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSome studies used measures tapping specific constructs such as self-efficacy and self-esteem, whereas others used broader measures such as overall quality of life.
“some studies used measures that tapped specific constructs, such as self-efficacy (e.g., Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008;Pedersen et al. 2012) and self-esteem (e.g., Chu et al. 2009), whereas others used broader measures, such as overall quality of life for children with cerebral palsy (e.g., Davis et al. 2009).”
From A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Psychosocial Outcomes (2015) · cites this paper as Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008
Three studies found beneficial psychological effects with farm animal-assisted therapy, although two of these studies reported findings using the same sample.
“three studies found beneficial psychological effects with farm animal-assisted therapy (Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008;Berget et al. 2011;Pedersen et al. 2012), although two of these studies reported findings using the same sample.”
From A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Psychosocial Outcomes (2015) · cites this paper as Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008
Only three studies, Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008, Berget et al. 2011, and Pedersen et al. 2012, reported follow-up assessments beyond the end of treatment.
“however, only three studies (Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008;Berget et al. 2011;Pedersen et al. 2012) reported follow-up assessments beyond the end of treatment.”
From A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Psychosocial Outcomes (2015) · cites this paper as Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008
AAI using farm animals may be beneficial for individuals with depression and other forms of psychiatric disorders.
“We also found that aaI using farm animals may be beneficial for individuals with depression (Pedersen et al. 2012) and other forms of psychiatric disorders (Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008;Berget et al. 2011).”
From A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Psychosocial Outcomes (2015) · cites this paper as Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008
Only five studies reported or provided sufficient information to calculate an effect size, such as eta squared statistics, to estimate the strength of the intervention effect.
“Finally, only five of the studies in the present review (Bass, Duchowny and llabre 2009;Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008;Berget et al. 2011;Pedersen et al. 2012;Villalta-Gil et al. 2009) reported or provided sufficient information to calculate an effect size (i.e., eta squared statistics) to estimate the strength of the intervention effect.”
From A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Psychosocial Outcomes (2015) · cites this paper as Berget, Ekeberg and Braastad 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pet as an Anxiolytic Intervention
WILSON, C. C. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199108000-00006 · Cited by 177
Animal-Assisted Therapy in Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Marr, C. A., French, L., Thompson, D., Drum, L., Greening, G., Mormon, J., Henderson, I., & Hughes, C. W. (2000) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279300786999950 · Cited by 123
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Hassink J van Dijk M Farming for health: green carefarming across Europe and the United States of America. Wageningen UR Frontis Series 2006 13 Dordrecht: Springer
- Mallon GP Cow as co-therapist: utilization of farm animals as therapeutic aides with children in residential treatment Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal 1994 11 455 474 10.1007/BF01876570 · DOI
- Vadnal K Hassink J, van Dijk M Farming for health in Slovenia Farming for Health. Green-Care Farming Across Europe and the United States of America. Wageningen UR Frontis Series 2006 13 Dordrecht: Springer 249 269
- Anderson WP Reid CM Jennings GL Pet ownership and cardiovascular disease The Medical Journal of Australia 1992 157 298 301 1435469
- Barker SB Kniseley JS Mccain NL Best AM Measuring stress and immune response in healthcare professionals following interaction with a therapy dog: A pilot study Psychological Reports 2005 96 713 729 10.2466/PR0.96.3.713-729 16050629 · DOI
- Friedmann E Fine A The Animal-Human Bond: Health and wellness Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy: theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice 2000 San Diego: Academic Press 41 58
- Fritz CL Farve TB Kass PH Hart LA Association with companion animals and the expression of noncognitive symptoms in Alzheimer's patients Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1995 183 7 459 463 7623018
- Odendaal JSJ Animal-assisted therapy – magic or medicine? Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2000 49 275 280 10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00183-5 11119784 · DOI
- Odendaal JSJ Meintjes RA Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behavior between humans and dogs The Veterinary Journal 2003 165 296 301 10.1016/S1090-0233(02)00237-X 12672376 · DOI · Paper page
- Bizub AL Joy A Davidson L "It's like being in another world": Demonstrating the benefits of therapeutic horseback riding for individuals with psychiatric disability Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2003 26 377 384 10.2975/26.2003.377.384 12739908 · DOI · Paper page
- Rajack LS Pets and human health: the influence of pets on cardiovascular and other aspects of owners' health PhD thesis 1997 University of Cambridge, UK
- Serpell J Beneficial effects of pet ownership on some aspects of human health and behaviour Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1991 84 717 720 1774745 PMC1295517
- Berget B Animal-assisted therapy: effects on persons with psychiatric disorders working with farm animals PhD Thesis 2006 20 Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences
- Berget B Skarsaunet I Ekeberg Ø Braastad BO Humans with mental disorders working with farm animals. A behavioral study Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 2007 23 101 117 10.1300/J004v23n02_05 · DOI
- Wahl A Burckhardt C Wiklund I Hanestad BR The Norwegian version of the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS-N): a validation and reliability study in patients suffering from psoriasis Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 1998 12 4 215 222 10.1080/02839319850162823 10067647 · DOI
- Bandura A Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change Psychological Review 1977 84 191 215 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 847061 · DOI · Paper page
- Bandura A Self-efficacy, mechanism in human agency American Psychologist 1982 37 122 147 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 · DOI · Paper page
- Ventura J Nuechterlein KH Subotnik KL Green MF Gitlin MJ Self-efficacy and neurocognition may be related to coping responses in recent-onset schizophrenia Schizophrenia Research 2004 69 343 352 10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.002 15469206 · DOI
- Colombo G Della Buono M Samania K Raviola R De Leo D Pet therapy and institutionalized elderly: A study on 144 cognitively unimpaired subjects Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2006 42 207 216 10.1016/j.archger.2005.06.011 16191447 · DOI · Paper page
- Antonioli C Riveley MA Randomised controlled trial of animal facilitated therapy with dolphins in the treatment of depression British Medical Journal 2005 331 1231 1234 16308382 10.1136/bmj.331.7527.1231 PMC1289317 · DOI
- Wilson CC Barker SA Challenges in designing human-animal interaction research American Behavioral Scientist 2003 47 16 28 10.1177/0002764203255208 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.
Stoffers-Winterling, J. M., Völlm, B. A., Rücker, G., Timmer, A., Huband, N., & Lieb, K. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005652.pub2 · Cited by 895
Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234 · Cited by 904
Maujean, A., Pepping, C. A., & Kendall, E. (2015) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279315x14129350721812 · Cited by 149
Hunt, M. G., & Chizkov, R. R. (2014) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/175303714x14023922797959 · Cited by 69
D’Amico, M. L., Jaffe, L. E., & Gardner, J. A. (2018) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2018.033332 · Cited by 68
Clark, S. D., Smidt, J. M., & Bauer, B. A. (2019) · Journal of Veterinary Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.002 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Berget, B., Ekeberg, Ø., & Braastad, B. O.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Berget, Bente
- Venue
- Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9
- ISSN
- 1745-0179 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2323374
- OpenAlex
- W2021048542
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Keywords
- animal-assisted therapy, livestock, mental illness, self-efficacy, coping capacity, quality of life, green care, schizophrenia, mood disorders, anxiety, personality disorders, human-animal interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review