Cited by 107Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Structure, reliability, and validity of the revised child anxiety and depression scale (RCADS) in a multi-ethnic urban sample of Dutch children

Open access
Kösters, Mia P., Chinapaw, Mai J. M., Zwaanswijk, Marieke, van der Wal, Marcel F., Koot, Hans M.·2015·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although anxiety and, to a lesser extent, depression are highly prevalent in children, these problems are, difficult to identify. The Revised Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) assesses self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression in youth. METHODS: The present study examined the factor structure, internal consistency, short-term stability, and validity including sensitivity to change of the RCADS in a multi-ethnic urban sample of 3636 Dutch children aged 8 to 13 years old. RESULTS: Results indicate that the RCADS is a reliable and valid instrument. The original 6-factor structure was replicated to a fair extent in the present study (RMSEA = 0.048) and internal consistency was good (αs = 0.70-0.96). ICCs for short-term stability were 0.76 to 0.86. Girls and children who indicated wishing to participate in a program targeting anxiety and depression had higher RCADS scores. Sensitivity to change analyses showed that the RCADS can detect changes in anxiety and depression symptoms in children who participated in a preventive intervention. The study showed low agreement between teacher and self-reported internalizing problems, even for children scoring above the 90(th) percentile of the RCADS, indicating a high level of problems, emphasizing the need to also take child reports into account when screening for anxiety and depression in children. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the RCADS can yield reliable data on a diversity of anxiety disorders and depression in urban children aged 8-13 from very diverse ethnic backgrounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR2397 . Registered 30 June 2010.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-015-0509-7

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Reynolds CR Richmond BO Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale: Second Edition (RCMAS-2) 2008 Torrance, CA Western Psychological Services
  2. [35]Hoek W Subclinical Depression and Anxiety in Adolescence: Developmental Trajectories and Online Intervention (Doctoral Dissertation) 2012 Amsterdam Faculty of Psychology and Education, Vrije Universiteit

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kösters, M. P., Chinapaw, M. J. M., Zwaanswijk, M., van der Wal, M. F., & Koot, H. M.
Affiliations
  • GGD Amsterdam (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Kösters, Mia P.
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2015-06-23
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
132-132
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106374600
Cited by
107
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw (50-50405-98-142)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale, childhood anxiety, childhood depression, internalizing problems, psychometric validation, factor structure, reliability statistics, sensitivity to change, preventive interventions, ethnic diversity, urban children, self-report screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Urban Population, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review