Cited by 69Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFamily and Disability Support Research

Parent distress reactions following a serious illness or injury in their child: a protocol paper for the take a breath cohort study

Open access
Muscara, Frank, Burke, Kylie, McCarthy, Maria C, Anderson, Vicki A, Hearps, Stephen JC, Hearps, Simone J, Dimovski, Anica, Nicholson, Jan M·2015·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of life threatening childhood illness or injury can lead to significant distress reactions in parents, with many experiencing clinically significant levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms. These symptoms can have long-term adverse impacts on parent mental health, family functioning, and the adjustment of the ill child. Independent studies have found such reactions in several different illness groups. However, very little research has systematically compared the prevalence, impact and trajectories over time of post-traumatic stress symptoms in parents across different childhood illness groups with an acute life threat. The current study seeks to map the course of post-traumatic stress reactions in parents of children with various life threatening illnesses over an 18 month period, and identify factors that predict successful adaptation in families. METHOD/DESIGN: The current study described is of a prospective, longitudinal design. The sample included parents of children admitted to four major hospital departments at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, for a life threatening illness or injury. Eligible parents were those who were caregivers of children aged 0-to 18-years admitted to the Oncology, Cardiology, Neurology and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Parents were recruited acutely, and completed self-report questionnaires at four time-points: within the first 4 weeks (T1:); then at 4 months (T2); 7 months (T3); and 19 months (T4) after admission. Questionnaires assessed parent and child mental health and wellbeing, and a number of risk and reliance factors such child illness factors, parent demographic factors, and psychosocial factors. DISCUSSION: This study is one of the first to document the trajectory of post-traumatic stress responses in parents of very ill children, across illness groups. Given that it will also identify risk and resilience factors, and map the course of parent outcomes over an 18 monthperiod, it has the potential to inform novel strategies for intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-015-0519-5

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Woolf C, Muscara F, McCarthy M.C, & Anderson, V. Acute & post-traumatic stress symptoms in parents of children with serious illness: systematic review. J Trauma Stress, (In Press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muscara, F., Burke, K., McCarthy, M. C., Anderson, V. A., Hearps, S. J., Hearps, S. J., Dimovski, A., & Nicholson, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Muscara, Frank
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2015-07-08
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
153-153
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1595191934
Cited by
69
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Pratt Foundation
  • State Government of Victoria
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (607333)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
parental distress, posttraumatic stress symptoms, childhood injuries, parental mental health, family functioning, child mental health, risk and resilience factors, longitudinal trajectories, pediatric oncology, pediatric intensive care, pediatric cardiology, pediatric neurology, caregiver well-being
MeSH terms
Child Health, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Clinical Protocols, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review