Cited by 76Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales

Open access
Williams, Ryan, Farquharson, Lorna, Palmer, Lucy, Bassett, Paul, Clarke, Jeremy, Clark, David M., Crawford, Mike J.·2016·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Providers of psychological therapies are encouraged to offer patients choice about their treatment, but there is very little information about what preferences people have or the impact that meeting these has on treatment outcomes. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey of people receiving psychological treatment from 184 NHS services in England and Wales. 14,587 respondents were asked about treatment preferences and the extent to which these were met by their service. They were also asked to rate the extent to which therapy helped them cope with their difficulties. RESULTS: Most patients (12,549-86.0 %, 95 % CI: 85.5-86.6) expressed a preference for at least one aspect of their treatment. Of these, 4,600 (36.7 %, 95 % CI: 35.8-37.5) had at least one preference that was not met. While most patients reported that their preference for appointment times, venue and type of treatment were met, only 1,769 (40.5 %) of the 4,253 that had a preference for gender had it met. People who expressed a preference that was not met reported poorer outcomes than those with a preference that was met (Odds Ratios: appointment times = 0.29, venue = 0.32, treatment type = 0.16, therapist gender = 0.32, language in which treatment was delivered = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who took part in this survey had preferences about their treatment. People who reported preferences that were not met were less likely to state that treatment had helped them with their problems. Routinely assessing and meeting patient preferences may improve the outcomes of psychological treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-015-0702-8

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: treatment and management. NICE. 2014. 25340235

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, R., Farquharson, L., Palmer, L., Bassett, P., Clarke, J., Clark, D. M., & Crawford, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • Royal College of Psychiatrists (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Crawford, Mike J.
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2016-01-15
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
4-4
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2233524645
Cited by
76
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
NHS England and the Welsh Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
patient preferences, psychotherapy, treatment selection, patient satisfaction, NHS mental health services, help-seeking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Wales, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Patient Preference, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review