Cited by 7Psychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Developing an emotional coping skills workbook for inpatient psychiatric settings: a focus group investigation.

Open access
Sharp, Molly, Gulati, Anu, Barker, Chris, Barnicot, Kirsten·2018·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests an unmet need for provision of psychological interventions in inpatient psychiatric settings. However, inpatient wards can present a challenging environment in which to implement interventions. The authors developed the Emotional Coping Skills workbook, a psychosocial intervention designed to overcome these challenges and provide inpatients with an opportunity for psychologically-informed therapeutic engagement. The workbook includes information and exercises to empower inpatients to understand their emotions and learn to cope with their distress. METHODS: A qualitative study using thematic analysis was undertaken in two UK inpatient psychiatric hospitals to explore staff's views about whether and how the workbook could be implemented, and on barriers to its use. Thirty-five nursing and occupational therapy staff members participated in four focus groups, and a further two psychologists in semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Staff identified key barriers to successful implementation of the workbook. These were firstly, the difficulty in finding time and space for therapeutic work in the stressful ward environment. Secondly, staff identified a culture of emotional neglect whereby neither staff nor inpatients felt able to talk about emotions, and patients' physical needs and medication were prioritised. Thirdly, staff discussed how psychotic symptoms and emotional distress could limit patients' ability to engage with the workbook material. Staff suggested ways in which the feasibility of using the workbook could be enhanced. Firstly, they discussed the importance of encouraging staff to value psychological approaches and to view the workbook as a resource to help them manage their existing tasks. Secondly, they emphasised the value of staff drawing on their expertise to deliver the workbook flexibly in different formats and settings, depending on each patient's particular presentation. Thirdly, they advocated empowering staff to decide the timing of intervention delivery in the context of each inpatient's fluctuations in distress and progress towards recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The study has highlighted key principles for flexible and well-integrated intervention delivery; these principles will be helpful for enhancing the feasibility of any nurse-delivered psychological intervention in inpatient settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-018-1790-z

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Main limitations for psychotherapy in acute settings consist of short hospital stays and patients' difficulties to engage due to treatment resistance, high distrust, emotional distress, severe cognitive deficits, and dual diagnoses.

    “Main limitations consist of short hospital stays (111) and patients’ general difficulties to engage with traditional psychotherapy concepts due to treatment resistance (112, 113), high distrust levels toward the entire environment (114), emotional distress (115), severe cognitive deficits (116), and dual diagnoses (117).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharp, M., Gulati, A., Barker, C., & Barnicot, K.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Barnicot, Kirsten
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2018-06-22
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
208-208
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808802416
Cited by
7
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
psychiatric inpatient care, psychosocial interventions, staff perspectives, implementation barriers, emotional neglect, emotional distress, psychotic symptoms, employee empowerment, treatment engagement
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Making, Emotions, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review