Cited by 25Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Cognitive predictors of treatment outcome for exposure therapy: do changes in self-efficacy, self-focused attention, and estimated social costs predict symptom improvement in social anxiety disorder?

Open access
Kampmann, Isabel L., Emmelkamp, Paul M. G., Morina, Nexhmedin·2019·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitions play an important role in the development and maintenance of social anxiety disorder (SAD). METHODS: = 36.9 years) diagnosed with SAD who received in vivo or virtual reality exposure therapy. RESULTS: Patients demonstrating a greater decrease in estimated social costs during treatment reported greater improvement of their social anxiety symptoms following both forms of exposure therapy. While changes in self-focused attention and social self-efficacy during treatment were significantly associated with treatment outcome when examined individually, these changes did not significantly predict symptom improvement beyond social costs. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in estimated social costs during treatment are associated with improvement of social anxiety symptoms after exposure therapy. Future research needs to further investigate estimated social costs as a predictor in relation to other cognitive variables. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01746667 ; www.clinicaltrials.gov, November 2012, retrospectively registered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-019-2054-2

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in attention focus may constitute a highly relevant process mechanism of therapeutic improvement during and after exposure therapy.

    “even though changes in attention focus may constitute a highly relevant process mechanism of therapeutic improvement during and after exposure therapy (Gregory and Peters, 2017; Kampmann et al., 2019; Norton and Abbott, 2016; Wong et al., 2017; Hofmann, 2000)”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Kampmann et al., 2019

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that reduced self-focused attention was associated with symptom improvement when examined alone and considers it a possible working mechanism of exposure therapy. But the association was not significant in the final model, and the authors say they tested associations, not causal mediation. The claim’s suggestion of a highly relevant process mechanism is therefore stronger than this study establishes. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Hofmann SG Otto MW Cognitive-behavior therapy of social anxiety disorder: evidence-based and disorder specific treatment techniques 2008 New York, NY Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kampmann, I. L., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Morina, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Kampmann, Isabel L.
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2019-02-22
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
80-80
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917960171
Cited by
25
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • URN:NBN Resolver for Germany & Switzerland (German National Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (655.10.207)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, exposure therapy, virtual reality exposure therapy, in vivo exposure, treatment outcome prediction, social self-efficacy, self-focus, cognitive predictors, symptom improvement
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Attention, Cognition, Fear, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review