Cited by 8Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

An evaluation of large group cognitive behaviour therapy with mindfulness (CBTm) classes

Open access
Thakur, Vishal K., Wong, Jacquelyne Y., Randall, Jason R., Bolton, James M., Parikh, Sagar V., Mota, Natalie, Whitney, Debbie, Palay, Joshua +4 more·2019·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ensuring equitable and timely access to Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is challenging within Canada's service delivery model. The current study aims to determine acceptability and effectiveness of 4-session, large, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy with Mindfulness (CBTm) classes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of adult outpatients (n = 523) who attended CBTm classes from 2015 to 2016. Classes were administered in a tertiary mental health clinic in Winnipeg, Canada and averaged 24 clients per session. Primary outcomes were (a) acceptability of the classes and retention rates and (b) changes in anxiety and depressive symptoms using Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) scales. RESULTS: Clients found classes useful and > 90% expressed a desire to attend future sessions. The dropout rate was 37.5%. A mixed-effects linear regression demonstrated classes improved anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 score change per class = - 0.52 [95%CI, - 0.74 to - 0.30], P < 0.001) and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score change per class = - 0.65 [95%CI, - 0.89 to - 0.40], P < 0.001). Secondary analysis found reduction in scores between baseline and follow-up to be 2.40 and 1.98 for the GAD-7 and PHQ-9, respectively. Effect sizes were small for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers preliminary evidence suggesting CBTm classes are an acceptable strategy to facilitate access and to engage and maintain clients' interest in pursuing CBT. Clients attending CBTm classes experienced improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms. Symptom improvement was not clinically significant. Study limitations, such as a lack of control group, should be addressed in future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-019-2124-5

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extant research suggests that mindfulness can have positive effects when practiced for 10 minutes daily, but shorter periods can also be associated with benefits.

    “It should be noted that the extant research suggests that mindfulness can have positive effects when practiced for 10 minutes daily, but shorter periods can also be associated with benefits [39-41].”

    From Web-Based Mindfulness Meditation as an Adjunct to Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Public Safety Personnel: Mixed Methods Feasibility Evaluation Study (2024) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods > Intervention section says clients were encouraged to practice mindfulness for five minutes twice a day, totaling 10 minutes daily. The Discussion reports possible improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms from the combined CBT-and-mindfulness classes, but does not isolate the effect of mindfulness practice or report benefits from less than 10 minutes daily. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thakur, V. K., Wong, J. Y., Randall, J. R., Bolton, J. M., Parikh, S. V., Mota, N., Whitney, D., Palay, J., Kinley, J., Diocee, S., Sala, T., & Sareen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Sareen, Jitender
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2019-05-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
132-132
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947418143
Cited by
7
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Mspace (University of Manitoba) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (333252)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
group therapy, access to mental health care, acceptability, treatment retention, dropout, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, outpatients, GAD-7, PHQ-9
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Canada, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Outpatients, Retrospective Studies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review