Cited by 171Agriculture and Farm SafetyMental Health Treatment and AccessRural development and sustainability

The health and wellbeing of Australian farmers: a longitudinal cohort study

Open access
Brew, Bronwyn, Inder, Kerry, Allen, Joanne, Thomas, Matthew, Kelly, Brian·2016·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Isolation, long work days, climate change and globalization are just some of the many pressures that make farming a vulnerable occupation for incurring mental health issues. The objective of this study was to determine whether farming in Australia is associated with poorer wellbeing, physical and mental health, and less health service use. METHODS: The Australian Rural Mental Health Study, a longitudinal cohort study was analysed over four time points comparing farmers with non-farming workers (n = 1184 at baseline). Participants were recruited from rural NSW, Australia. A number of physical, mental health, wellbeing, service use outcomes were assessed using generalised estimating equations including all waves in each model. Barriers to seeking help were also assessed. RESULTS: Farmers who lived remotely reported worse mental health (β -0.33, 95 % CI -0.53, -0.13) and wellbeing (β -0.21(95 % CI -0.35, -0.06) than remote non-farm workers regardless of financial hardship, rural specific factors eg drought worry, or recent adverse events. All farmers were no different to non-farming workers on physical health aspects except for chronic illnesses, where they reported fewer illnesses (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.44, 0.98). All farmers were half as likely to visit a general practitioner (GP) or a mental health professional in the last 12 months as compared to non-farm workers regardless of location (OR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35, 0.97). Rural workers felt that they preferred to manage themselves rather than access help for physical health needs (50 %) or mental health needs (75 %) and there was little difference between farmers and non-farm workers in reasons for not seeking help. CONCLUSIONS: Remoteness is a significant factor in the mental health and wellbeing of farmers, more so than financial stress, rural factors and recent adverse events. Creative programs and policies that improve access for farmers to GPs and mental health professionals should be supported.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-016-3664-y

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]Glymour MM Greenland S Rothman K Greenland S Lash T Causal Diagrams Modern Epidemiology 2008 3 Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brew, B., Inder, K., Allen, J., Thomas, M., & Kelly, B.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health (AU)
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • Charles Sturt University (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Brew, Bronwyn
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2016-09-15
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
988-988
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520360803
Cited by
171
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (401241)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Rural development and sustainability
Keywords
farmers, mental health, well-being, remoteness, rural mental health, help-seeking barriers, health care utilization, chronic disease, financial hardship, rural New South Wales
MeSH terms
Farmers, Adult, Australia, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Rural Population, Droughts, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review