Cited by 161Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is screen time associated with anxiety or depression in young people? Results from a UK birth cohort

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited and conflicting evidence for associations between use of screen-based technology and anxiety and depression in young people. We examined associations between screen time measured at 16 years and anxiety and depression at 18. METHODS: Participants (n = 14,665; complete cases n = 1869) were from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a UK-based prospective cohort study. We assessed associations between various types of screen time (watching television, using a computer, and texting, all measured via questionnaire at 16y), both on weekdays and at weekends, and anxiety and depression (measured via the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule at 18y). Using ordinal logistic regression, we adjusted for multiple confounders, particularly focussing on activities that might have been replaced by screen time (for example exercising or playing outdoors). RESULTS: More time spent using a computer on weekdays was associated with a small increased risk of anxiety (OR for 1-2 h = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.35; OR for 3+ hours = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.55, both compared to < 1 h, p for linear trend = 0.003). We found a similar association between computer use at weekends and anxiety (OR for 1-2 h = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.46; OR for 3+ hours = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.48, p for linear trend = 0.03). Greater time spent using a computer on weekend days only was associated with a small increased risk in depression (OR for 1-2 h = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.35; OR for 3+ hours = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.65, p for linear trend = 0.003). Adjusting for time spent alone attenuated effects for anxiety but not depression. There was little evidence for associations with texting or watching television. CONCLUSIONS: We found associations between increased screen time, particularly computer use, and a small increased risk of anxiety and depression. Time spent alone was found to attenuate some associations, and further research should explore this.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-018-6321-9

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Flow diagram depicting the children from the ALSPAC cohort included in the present study
Fig. 1 Flow diagram depicting the children from the ALSPAC cohort included in the present studyCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wechsler D. The Wechsler intelligence scale for children—third edition. 3rd ed. San Antonio: TX; 1992.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Khouja, J. N., Munafò, M. R., Tilling, K., Wiles, N. J., Joinson, C., Etchells, P. J., John, A., Hayes, F. M., Gage, S. H., & Cornish, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Bath Spa University (GB)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Khouja, Jasmine N.
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2019-01-17
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
82-82
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914648011
Cited by
161
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 4
FWCI
42.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Space (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (102215/2/13/2, MM_UU_12013/6)
  • Wellcome Trust (102215/2/13/2, 105612/Z/14/Z)
  • Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research (105612/Z/14/Z)
  • University of Bristol (105612/Z/14/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
screen time, computer use, anxiety, depression, youth, adolescents, television viewing, text messaging, time spent alone, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, mental health, sedentary behavior, digital technology use, self-esteem
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Adolescent, Anxiety, Computers, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review