Cited by 351Physical Activity and HealthErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The association between sedentary behaviour and risk of anxiety: a systematic review

Open access
Teychenne, Megan, Costigan, Sarah A, Parker, Kate·2015·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research has linked sedentary behaviour (SB) to adverse physical health outcomes in adults and youth. Although evidence for the relationship between SB and mental health outcomes (e.g., depression) is emerging, little is known regarding risk of anxiety. METHODS: A systematic search for original research investigating the association between SB and risk of anxiety was performed using numerous electronic databases. A total of nine observational studies (seven cross-sectional and two longitudinal) were identified. Methodological quality of studies was assessed and a best-evidence synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: One cross-sectional study demonstrated a strong methodological quality, five cross-sectional studies demonstrated a moderate methodological quality and three studies (two cross-sectional one longitudinal) received a weak methodological quality rating. Overall, there was moderate evidence for a positive relationship between total SB and anxiety risk as well as for a positive relationship between sitting time and anxiety risk. There was inconsistent evidence for the relationship between screen time, television viewing time, computer use, and anxiety risk. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence is available on the association between SB and risk of anxiety. However, our findings suggest a positive association (i.e. anxiety risk increases as SB time increases) may exist (particularly between sitting time and risk of anxiety). Further high-quality longitudinal/interventional research is needed to confirm findings and determine the direction of these relationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-015-1843-x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical guidelines for metabolic screening upon initiation or continuation of SGAs recommend that blood pressure, BMI, blood glucose and lipids be checked at least every six months.

    “Currently, clinical guidelines for metabolic screening upon initiation or continuation of SGAs put forth that blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), blood glucose and lipids should be checked at least every six months.[131][132][133]”
  • Positive associations between screen-based sedentary behaviors and emotional disorder symptoms have been previously identified, but much of the work to date is cross-sectional.

    “While positive associations between screen-based sedentary behaviors and emotional disorder symptoms have been previously identified, much of the work to date is cross-sectional (Hoare et al., 2016; Teychenne et al., 2015)”
  • Physical inactivity has been identified as a risk factor for the development of anxiety.

    “Conversely, physical inactivity has been identified as a risk factor for the development of anxiety [53]⁠ as well as for other conditions such as depression [54–56]⁠.”
  • Physical inactivity is a significant but modifiable cardiovascular risk factor that is widespread in people with mental health problems, including anxiety disorders.

    “Factors such as physical inactivity represent a significant, but modifiable cardiovascular risk factor that is widespread in people with mental health problems [107]⁠, including anxiety disorders [25•, 53]⁠.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Taintor Z Rosenthal RN Microprocessor abuse and internet addiction 2009 4 Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teychenne, M., Costigan, S. A., & Parker, K.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Teychenne, Megan
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2015-06-19
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
513-513
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1943532712
Cited by
351
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
sedentary behavior, anxiety, sitting time, screen time, television viewing, computer use, mental health, physical inactivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Humans, Male, Risk Assessment, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review