Cited by 299Physical Activity and HealthErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The associations between screen time-based sedentary behavior and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Wang, Xiao, Li, Yuexuan, Fan, Haoliang·2019·BMC Public Health

Abstract

Background: The use of computers/TV has become increasingly common worldwide after entering the twenty-first century and depression represents a growing public health burden. Understanding the association between screen time-based sedentary behavior (ST-SB) and the risk of depression is important to the development of prevention and intervention strategies. Methods: We searched the electronic databases of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was adopted as the pooled measurement. Subgroup analyses were investigated by stratified meta-analyses based on age, gender and reference group (reference category of screen time, e.g. 2 h/day, 4 h/day). Results: There were 12 cross-sectional studies and 7 longitudinal studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the pooled OR was 1.28 with high heterogeneity (I 2 = 89%). Compared to those who reported less SB, persons reporting more SB had a significantly higher risk of depression. When the gender was stratified, the pooled OR was 1.18 in female groups while no significant association was observed in males. Among the 19 studies, 5 studies used a reference group with ST = 2 h/days (pooled OR = 1.46), 9 studies used ≥4 h as a reference group (pooled OR = 1.38), 2 studies used 1 h as a reference group (pooled OR = 1.07) and for the remaining 3 studies, hours of ST were calculated as a continuous variable (pooled OR = 1.04). Conclusions: ST-SB is associated with depression risk and the effects vary in different populations. In addition, valid objective measures of SB should be developed in future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-019-7904-9

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More screen time has been associated with depressive symptoms among children and adolescents in several systematic reviews.

    “More screen time has been associated with depressive symptoms among children and adolescents in several systematic reviews [11, 12, 43–50].”
  • The results of the current review largely align with past systematic reviews, which have concluded that there is a positive association between screen time and depressive symptoms, and a weak association between screen time and both anxiety and self-esteem.

    “The results of the current review largely align with past systematic reviews, which have concluded that there is a positive association between screen time and depressive symptoms (Hoare et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2016;Stiglic & Viner, 2019;Wang et al., 2019), and a weak association between screen time and both anxiety and self-esteem (Stiglic & Viner, 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Li, Y., & Fan, H.
Affiliations
  • Shanxi Medical University (CN)
  • Southern Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Xiao
  • Fan, Haoliang
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2019-11-14
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
1524-1524
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2988909975
Cited by
299
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 14 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Technology Plans to Youth R&D Innovation (QCXM201705)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
screen time, sedentary behavior, depression, depression risk, gender differences, reference groups, television viewing, computer use
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Computers, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Television, Exercise, Young Adult, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review