Cited by 41Reproductive Health and TechnologiesSperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health Studies

Prevalence of depression in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Kiani, Zahra, Fakari, Fahimeh Rashidi, Hakimzadeh, Atena, Hajian, Sepideh, Fakari, Farzaneh Rashidi, Nasiri, Malihe·2023·BMC Public Health

Abstract

Abstract Background Generally, infertile men hide their depression, which can threaten their health and lower their quality of life. Given the role of depression and its impact on people's health, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prevalence of depression in infertile men. Methods This research is a systematic review and meta-analysis based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Using the keywords of "Depression", "Emotional Depression", "Infertility", "Prevalence", and "Epidemiology", all English language articles were searched in international databases (PubMed, Cochran library, Web of sciences, Scopus, Embase, PsyINFO, and Google scholar) by two reviewers independently and without considering the time limit until September 2022. Title, abstract, full text and quality of each study were evaluated by two reviewers independently using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale checklist. The results were analyzed using programming language and R software, and I2 test and Egger's Test were used to check heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively. Results Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic part of this study; and 8 different measurement tools were used to identify depression. Then, based on the possibility of meta-analysis, 18 studies were included in 4 subgroups. Given the heterogeneity of the articles, random effect model was used. The overall prevalence of depression in infertile men was 18.30%. The lowest and highest overall prevalence of depression in men was reported to be 14.04% and 23.63% in the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZDS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) tools, respectively. The overall prevalence of depression among infertile men was reported to be 18.55% and 16.75% using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) tools, respectively. Conclusion Based on the findings of this study, the significant prevalence of depression in infertile men requires a specific attention and planning. The study revealed varying degrees of depression among infertile men, emphasizing the importance of assessing their mental health, specifically in terms of depression, during infertility treatments as a hidden variable. It is strongly recommended to develop training programs for health service providers to effectively utilize diagnostic tools in this particular field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-023-16865-4

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [41]Liu Y-F Fu Z Chen S-W He X-P Fan L-Y The analysis of anxiety and depression in different stages of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in couples in China Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 58 3 649 57 10.2147/NDT.S287198 PMC7920591 33658786 · DOI
  2. [42]Fernandes J Pedro J Costa ME Martins MV Effect of depression and anxiety on sexual functioning in couples trying to conceive with and without an infertility diagnosis Psychol Health 2023 38 1 58 75 10.1080/08870446.2021.1955115 34279131 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiani, Z., Fakari, F. R., Hakimzadeh, A., Hajian, S., Fakari, F. R., & Nasiri, M.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Hajian, Sepideh
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2023-10-11
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
1972-1972
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387529026
Cited by
41
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
depression, male infertility, prevalence, mental health, depression screening, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, DASS, infertility treatment
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, Infertility, Male, Quality of Life, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review