Cited by 1Cellular transport and secretionGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 15 of the 19 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

CCDC22 mutations that impair COMMD binding cause attenuated 3C/Ritscher-Schinzel syndrome

Open access

Abstract

The CCC complex, composed of CCDC22, CCDC93, and ten proteins of the COMMD family, coordinates several critical steps required to recycle internalized plasma membrane proteins from endosomes to the cell surface. CCC interacts with Retriever, a trimeric cargo recognition complex comprising VPS35L, VPS26C, and VPS29, and works closely with the WASH complex, a crucial regulator of branched actin polymerization at endosomal membranes. Mutations in genes encoding subunits of these three complexes, CCDC22, VPS35L, and WASHC5, have been linked with a developmental syndrome known as 3 C (cranio-cerebello-cardiac) or Ritscher-Schinzel syndrome. Here, we report a new CCDC22 missense mutation, p.E208K, that results in attenuated 3 C syndrome, without cardiac or neuroanatomical abnormalities. We show that this mutation impairs CCC complex assembly by disrupting a conserved interaction surface required for CCDC22-COMMD4 binding. We also review previously described cases and identify that CCDC22 p.P172R has a similar attenuated phenotype and impairs complex assembly in a similar fashion as p.E208K. The characterization of these mutations adds to our understanding of the clinical and molecular spectrum of these disorders.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A novel CCDC22 missense variant, p.E208K, causes attenuated 3C/Ritscher-Schinzel syndrome in two brothers by impairing CCDC22 binding to the COMMD ring. The previously reported CCDC22 p.P172R variant has a similar attenuated clinical and molecular phenotype, whereas R234C and Y557C did not significantly disrupt CCC/Retriever assembly in the assays used.

Key findings

  • Two male siblings with moderate intellectual disability, seizures beginning at ~18 months, ASD Level 3 in proband #1, cerebral palsy in proband #2, normal cardiac function/no congenital anomalies, stature at the 10th percentile, normal head circumference, and elevated fasting total cholesterol (5.7 mmol/L or 220 mg/dL; 6.1 mmol/L or 236 mg/dL) carried a novel X-linked CCDC22 missense variant, p.E208K (X:49,243,370 G>A; ClinVar SCV005315736).
  • E208K lies at the CCDC22–COMMD4 interface, contacting COMMD4 K180, and significantly reduced CCDC22 binding to COMMD4 and all COMMD ring proteins, as well as CCDC22 dimerization with CCDC93, binding to DENND10, and binding to Retriever subunit VPS35L; quantification was from n = 4 independent experiments, *p < 0.05 by ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction.
  • CCDC22 p.P172R phenocopied E208K, reducing binding to COMMD proteins, CCDC93, DENND10, and VPS35L, while R234C and Y557C caused no statistically significant changes in these interactions.
  • In the clinical comparison table, the E208K cases showed 2/2 intellectual disability, 2/2 seizures, 0/2 congenital heart disease, 2/2 posterior occipital-parietal white matter hypomyelination, and 2/2 digital anomalies; P172R showed 1/1 intellectual disability, 1/1 seizures, and 0/1 congenital heart disease.

Methods

  • Clinical exome sequencing was performed by Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and later trio sequencing by Blueprint Genetics; targeted sequencing was done on maternal relatives, and plasma cholesterol/copper were measured as part of clinical care.
  • Co-evolution among CCC, Retriever, and WASH complex genes was assessed using the machine-learning-based phylogenetic profiling portal MLPP; molecular modeling used a cryo-EM CCC complex model complemented by an experimentally validated AlphaFold2 model.
  • HEK293T cells were transfected with HA-tagged CCDC22 wild-type or mutants E208K, P172R, R234C, and Y557C; interactions were tested by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting, with quantification from n = 4 independent experiments and ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction.

Limitations

  • The authors state that the impact of Y557C is impossible to determine from the cryo-EM structure due to resolution and inherent flexibility, that the mechanism for R234C is lacking, and that the overall function of the COMMD ring and the reason for strict conservation of all ten COMMD proteins remain unknown.
  • Evident from the text: the clinical sample is very small (two affected siblings), and prior variant comparisons rely on single or few reported cases, limiting genotype–phenotype generalization.
  • Evident from the text: functional conclusions rely on overexpression in HEK293T cells and binding assays, without patient-derived cells, rescue experiments, or in vivo models of endosomal recycling or organismal phenotypes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12920-025-02168-7

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 Pedigree and clinical features of two probands with a novel CCDC22 pathogenic variant. (A) Family pedigree, including CCDC22 genotypes of individuals tested. G = wild-type allele, A = mutant allele. (B–F) Clinical features of probands #1 and #2 depicting short stature (B), eyebrow features (C), dental crowding and large maxillary incisors (D), profile appearance (E), external ear dysmorphism (F), and hand abnormalities in proband #2 (G)
Fig. 1 Pedigree and clinical features of two probands with a novel CCDC22 pathogenic variant. (A) Family pedigree, including CCDC22 genotypes of individuals tested. G = wild-type allele, A = mutant allele. (B–F) Clinical features of probands #1 and #2 depicting short stature (B), eyebrow features (C), dental crowding and large maxillary incisors (D), profile appearance (E), external ear dysmorphism (F), and hand abnormalities in proband #2 (G)CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Structural and evolutionary features of CCDC22. (A) Schematic models of CCDC22, highlighting the location of the uncharacterized mutations examined in this study, including the new mutation reported here, E208K. The cartoon on the left depicts the overall organization of the CCC-Retriever complex; the cartoon on the right hides the N-terminal globular domains of COMMD proteins to reveal the interactions between COMMD domains and the CBD domains of CCDC22 and CCDC93; the cartoon on the bottom right indicates the position of the mutations in the CCDC22 polypeptide and is annotated for its key domains. CBD, COMMD binding domain; DBD, DENND10 binding domain; VBD, VPS35L binding domain. (B) Protein sequence alignments of CCDC22 across various animal species. P172, E208, and R234 are highlighted in yellow. Residues conserved in at least 10 of 16 sequences are highlighted in grey. (C) Heatmap showing coevolution of CCC complex, Retriever, and WASH complex encoding genes. Yellow-bordered box highlights genes of interest
Fig. 2 Structural and evolutionary features of CCDC22. (A) Schematic models of CCDC22, highlighting the location of the uncharacterized mutations examined in this study, including the new mutation reported here, E208K. The cartoon on the left depicts the overall organization of the CCC-Retriever complex; the cartoon on the right hides the N-terminal globular domains of COMMD proteins to reveal the interactions between COMMD domains and the CBD domains of CCDC22 and CCDC93; the cartoon on the bottom right indicates the position of the mutations in the CCDC22 polypeptide and is annotated for its key domains. CBD, COMMD binding domain; DBD, DENND10 binding domain; VBD, VPS35L binding domain. (B) Protein sequence alignments of CCDC22 across various animal species. P172, E208, and R234 are highlighted in yellow. Residues conserved in at least 10 of 16 sequences are highlighted in grey. (C) Heatmap showing coevolution of CCC complex, Retriever, and WASH complex encoding genes. Yellow-bordered box highlights genes of interestCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Molecular evaluation of uncharacterized CCDC22 mutations. (A) Structural model highlighting CCDC22 residues in the CBD (P172, E208, and R234) and their relative positioning relative the COMMD protein ring. (B) Immunoprecipitation of CCDC22 in transfected HEK293T cells followed by immunoblotting for the indicated proteins. CCDC22 WT and E208K are compared. EV, empty vector. (C) Structural model depicting CCDC22 Y557, located at the VBD, and its relative position against VPS35L. (D) Immunoprecipitation of CCDC22 in transfected HEK293T cells followed by immunoblotting for the indicated proteins. CCDC22 WT and mutations P172R, R234C, and Y557C, are compared. (E) Bar graphs represent the binding of the CCC complex subunits to the wild-type or mutants of CCDC22. Quantification after normalization to the precipitated bait protein is presented as % compared with the wild-type CCDC22 (n = 4 independent experiments). * p < 0.05 by ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction
Fig. 3 Molecular evaluation of uncharacterized CCDC22 mutations. (A) Structural model highlighting CCDC22 residues in the CBD (P172, E208, and R234) and their relative positioning relative the COMMD protein ring. (B) Immunoprecipitation of CCDC22 in transfected HEK293T cells followed by immunoblotting for the indicated proteins. CCDC22 WT and E208K are compared. EV, empty vector. (C) Structural model depicting CCDC22 Y557, located at the VBD, and its relative position against VPS35L. (D) Immunoprecipitation of CCDC22 in transfected HEK293T cells followed by immunoblotting for the indicated proteins. CCDC22 WT and mutations P172R, R234C, and Y557C, are compared. (E) Bar graphs represent the binding of the CCC complex subunits to the wild-type or mutants of CCDC22. Quantification after normalization to the precipitated bait protein is presented as % compared with the wild-type CCDC22 (n = 4 independent experiments). * p < 0.05 by ANOVA with Dunnett’s correctionCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

22 Own result · 9 Own interpretation · 4 Partly supported · 3 Own method · 2 Supported · 1 Not checked yet · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 18 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 19
24 of 24
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The HEK293T overexpression system used for immunoprecipitation reflects the endogenous behavior of CCDC22 and its interactions.

    “HEK293T cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and l-glutamine. A standard Lipofectamine 2000 transfection protocol was used to transfect plasmids in HEK293T cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The antibodies used in immunoblotting specifically detect their intended target proteins.

    “The antibodies used for immunoblotting are the following: COMMD1 (Novus Biologicals, NBP2-03755), COMMD2 (Custom made, UT-R 42), COMMD3 (Custom made, UT-R 43), COMMD4 (Custom made UT-691), COMMD5 (ProteinTech Group, 67043-1-IG), COMMD6 (Custom made, 051-AP), COMMD7 (Custom made, UT-R 47), COMMD8 (Custom made, UT-GP 135), COMMD9 (Custom made, 192-AP), COMMD10 (Santa Cruz, sc-398798), CCDC93 (Prote”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Singla, A., Rogers, C., Touma, M.-J., El-Najjar, Y., Colley, A., Boesch, D. J., Billadeau, D. D., Gecz, J., Chen, B., & Burstein, E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Hunter Genetics (AU)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Burstein, Ezra
Venue
BMC Medical Genomics
Published
2025-05-30
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
98-98
ISSN
1755-8794 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410895080
Cited by
1
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 DK107733, R35 GM128786)
  • National Science Foundation (CDF 2047640)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
missense mutations, protein-protein interaction, complex assembly, endosomal recycling, WASH complex, Retriever, genotype-phenotype correlation
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Multiple, Female, Humans, Male, Mutation, Protein Binding, Mutation, Missense, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review