Cited by 190Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Machine learning in precision diabetes care and cardiovascular risk prediction

Open access
Oikonomou, Evangelos K., Khera, Rohan·2023·Cardiovascular Diabetology

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are driving a paradigm shift in medicine, promising data-driven, personalized solutions for managing diabetes and the excess cardiovascular risk it poses. In this comprehensive review of machine learning applications in the care of patients with diabetes at increased cardiovascular risk, we offer a broad overview of various data-driven methods and how they may be leveraged in developing predictive models for personalized care. We review existing as well as expected artificial intelligence solutions in the context of diagnosis, prognostication, phenotyping, and treatment of diabetes and its cardiovascular complications. In addition to discussing the key properties of such models that enable their successful application in complex risk prediction, we define challenges that arise from their misuse and the role of methodological standards in overcoming these limitations. We also identify key issues in equity and bias mitigation in healthcare and discuss how the current regulatory framework should ensure the efficacy and safety of medical artificial intelligence products in transforming cardiovascular care and outcomes in diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12933-023-01985-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Oikonomou, E. K., & Khera, R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Khera, Rohan
Venue
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Published
2023-09-25
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
259-259
ISSN
1475-2840 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387012889
Cited by
190
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 5
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Diabetology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, United States (F32HL170592, K23HL153775)
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation,United States (2022060)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
machine learning, artificial intelligence, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular risk prediction, precision medicine, diabetes diagnosis, outcome prediction, phenotyping, diabetes treatment, cardiovascular complications, algorithmic bias, health equity, regulatory framework
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Heart Disease Risk Factors, Artificial Intelligence, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review