CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of different types of CRISPR/Cas-based systems in bacteria

Liu, Zhenquan, Dong, Huina, Cui, Yali, Cong, Lina, Zhang, Dawei·2020·Microbial Cell Factories
DOI 10.1186/s12934-020-01431-zPMC PMC7470686
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As important genome editing tools, CRISPR/Cas systems, especially those based on type II Cas9 and type V Cas12a, are widely used in genetic and metabolic engineering of bacteria. However, the intrinsic toxicity of Cas9 and Cas12a-mediated CRISPR/Cas tools can lead to cell death in some strains, which led to the development of endogenous type I and III CRISPR/Cas systems. However, these systems are hindered by complicated development and limited applications. Thus, further development and optimization of CRISPR/Cas systems is needed. Here, we briefly summarize the mechanisms of different types of CRISPR/Cas systems as genetic manipulation tools and compare their features to provide a reference for selecting different CRISPR/Cas tools. Then, we show the use of CRISPR/Cas technology for bacterial strain evolution and metabolic engineering, including genome editing, gene expression regulation and the base editor tool. Finally, we offer a view of future directions for bacterial CRISPR/Cas technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12934-020-01431-z

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. Choi KR, Lee SY. CRISPR technologies for bacterial systems: current achievements and future directions. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34(7):1180–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.08.002. · DOI
  2. Becker J, Wittmann C. Advanced biotechnology: metabolically engineered cells for the bio-based production of chemicals and fuels, materials, and health-care products. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54(11):3328–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409033. · DOI
  3. Choi KR, Shin JH, Cho JS, Yang D, Lee SY. Systems metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli. EcoSal Plus. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0010-2015. · DOI
  4. Straathof AJ. Transformation of biomass into commodity chemicals using enzymes or cells. Chem Rev. 2014;114(3):1871–908. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400309c. · DOI
  5. Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, Costa F, Shah SA, Saunders SJ, Koonin EV. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(11):722–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3569. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Mohanraju P, Makarova KS, Zetsche B, Zhang F, Koonin EV, van der Oost J. Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Science. 2016;353(aad5147):5147. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5147. · DOI
  7. Wang F, Wang L, Zou X, Duan S, Li Z, Deng Z, Chen S. Advances in CRISPR-Cas systems for RNA targeting, tracking and editing. Biotechnol Adv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.03.016. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, Zhang F. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015;163(3):759–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Goh YJ, Pan M, Sanozky-Dawes R, Barrangou R. Genome editing using the endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas system in Lactobacillus crispatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905421116. · DOI
  10. Ichikawa HT, Cooper JC, Lo L, Potter J, Terns RM, Terns MP. Programmable type III-A CRISPR-Cas DNA targeting modules. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0176221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176221. · DOI
  11. Jiang F, Doudna JA. CRISPR-Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys. 2017;46:505–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010822. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gao P, Yang H, Rajashankar KR, Huang Z, Patel DJ. Type V CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 endonuclease employs a unique mechanism for crRNA-mediated target DNA recognition. Cell Res. 2016;26(8):901–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2016.88. · DOI
  13. Wang H, La Russa M, Qi LS. CRISPR/Cas9 in genome editing and beyond. Annu Rev Biochem. 2016;85:227–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014607. · DOI
  14. Fang H, Li D, Kang J, Jiang P, Sun J, Zhang D. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for de novo biosynthesis of vitamin B12. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4917. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07412-6. · DOI
  15. Standage-Beier K, Zhang Q, Wang X. Targeted large-scale deletion of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-nickases. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4(11):1217–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00132. · DOI
  16. Banno S, Nishida K, Arazoe T, Mitsunobu H, Kondo A. Deaminase-mediated multiplex genome editing in Escherichia coli. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3(4):423–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-017-0102-6. · DOI
  17. Liu Y, Wan X, Wang B. Engineered CRISPRa enables programmable eukaryote-like gene activation in bacteria. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11479-0. · DOI
  18. Tan SZ, Reisch CR, Prather KLJ, O’Toole G. A robust CRISPR interference gene repression system in pseudomonas. J Bacteriol. 2018;200(7):e00575-00517. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00575-17. · DOI
  19. Cress BF, Toparlak OD, Guleria S, Lebovich M, Stieglitz JT, Englaender JA, Koffas MA. CRISPathBrick: modular combinatorial assembly of type II-A CRISPR arrays for dCas9-mediated multiplex transcriptional repression in E. coli. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4(9):987–1000. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00012. · DOI
  20. Ji W, Lee D, Wong E, Dadlani P, Dinh D, Huang V, Lim WA. Specific gene repression by CRISPRi system transferred through bacterial conjugation. ACS Synth Biol. 2014;3(12):929–31. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb500036q. · DOI
  21. Li S, Jendresen CB, Grunberger A, Ronda C, Jensen SI, Noack S, Nielsen AT. Enhanced protein and biochemical production using CRISPRi-based growth switches. Metab Eng. 2016;38:274–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2016.09.003. · DOI
  22. Bikard D, Jiang W, Samai P, Hochschild A, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(15):7429–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt520. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Zheng K, Wang Y, Li N, Jiang FF, Wu CX, Liu F, Liu ZF. Highly efficient base editing in bacteria using a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Commun Biol. 2018;1:32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0035-5. · DOI
  24. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(12):6640–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120163297. · DOI
  25. Jiang Y, Chen B, Duan C, Sun B, Yang J, Yang S. Multigene editing in the Escherichia coli genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(7):2506–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04023-14. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Reisch CR, Prather KL. The no-SCAR (scarless Cas9 assisted recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15096. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15096. · DOI
  27. Xia J, Wang L, Zhu JB, Sun CJ, Zheng MG, Zheng L, Shi L. Expression of Shewanella frigidimarina fatty acid metabolic genes in E. coli by CRISPR/cas9-coupled lambda Red recombineering. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38(1):117–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1956-4. · DOI
  28. Zhao D, Yuan S, Xiong B, Sun H, Ye L, Li J, Bi C. Development of a fast and easy method for Escherichia coli genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15(1):205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0605-5. · DOI
  29. Chen W, Zhang Y, Yeo WS, Bae T, Ji Q. Rapid and efficient genome editing in Staphylococcus aureus by using an engineered CRISPR/Cas9 system. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(10):3790–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b13317. · DOI
  30. Ronda C, Pedersen LE, Sommer MO, Nielsen AT. CRMAGE: CRISPR optimized MAGE recombineering. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19452. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19452. · DOI
  31. Huang H, Zheng G, Jiang W, Hu H, Lu Y. One-step high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Streptomyces. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2015;47(4):231–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmv007. · DOI
  32. Li Y, Lin Z, Huang C, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Tang YJ, Zhao X. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli using CRISPR-Cas9 meditated genome editing. Metab Eng. 2015;31:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.06.006. · DOI
  33. Mougiakos I, Mohanraju P, Bosma EF, Vrouwe V, Finger Bou M, Naduthodi MIS, van der Oost J. Characterizing a thermostable Cas9 for bacterial genome editing and silencing. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1647. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01591-4. · DOI
  34. Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP, Kivisaar M. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(15):5103–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01248-15. · DOI
  35. Bassalo MC, Garst AD, Halweg-Edwards AL, Grau WC, Domaille DW, Mutalik VK, Gill RT. Rapid and efficient one-step metabolic pathway integration in E. coli. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5(7):561–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00187. · DOI
  36. Chung ME, Yeh IH, Sung LY, Wu MY, Chao YP, Ng IS, Hu YC. Enhanced integration of large DNA into E. coli chromosome by CRISPR/Cas9. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(1):172–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26056. · DOI
  37. Altenbuchner J. Editing of the Bacillus subtilis Genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 System. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(17):5421–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01453-16. · DOI
  38. Wasels F, Jean-Marie J, Collas F, Lopez-Contreras AM, Lopes Ferreira N. A two-plasmid inducible CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing tool for Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;140:5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2017.06.010. · DOI
  39. Cobb RE, Wang Y, Zhao H. High-efficiency multiplex genome editing of Streptomyces species using an engineered CRISPR/Cas system. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4(6):723–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb500351f. · DOI
  40. Zhang MM, Wong FT, Wang Y, Luo S, Lim YH, Heng E, Zhao H. CRISPR-Cas9 strategy for activation of silent Streptomyces biosynthetic gene clusters. Nat Chem Biol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2341. · DOI
  41. Bruder MR, Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP. Extending CRISPR-Cas9 technology from genome editing to transcriptional engineering in the genus Clostridium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(20):6109–19. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02128-16. · DOI
  42. Wolf T, Gren T, Thieme E, Wibberg D, Zemke T, Puhler A, Kalinowski J. Targeted genome editing in the rare actinomycete Actinoplanes sp. SE50/110 by using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. J Biotechnol. 2016;231:122–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.05.039. · DOI
  43. Zhang K, Duan X, Wu J. Multigene disruption in undomesticated Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051a using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27943. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27943. · DOI
  44. Cho JS, Choi KR, Prabowo CPS, Shin JH, Yang D, Jang J, Lee SY. CRISPR/Cas9-coupled recombineering for metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab Eng. 2017;42:157–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2017.06.010. · DOI
  45. Liu J, Wang Y, Lu Y, Zheng P, Sun J, Ma Y. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing toolbox for Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0815-5. · DOI
  46. Peng F, Wang X, Sun Y, Dong G, Yang Y, Liu X, Bai Z. Efficient gene editing in Corynebacterium glutamicum using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0814-6. · DOI
  47. Wang Y, Zhang ZT, Seo SO, Lynn P, Lu T, Jin YS, Blaschek HP. Bacterial genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9: deletion, integration, single nucleotide modification, and desirable “clean” mutant selection in Clostridium beijerinckii as an example. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5(7):721–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00060. · DOI
  48. Jia H, Zhang L, Wang T, Han J, Tang H, Zhang L. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-editing tool in Streptomyces rimosus. Microbiology. 2017;163(8):1148–55. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000501. · DOI
  49. Zeng H, Wen S, Xu W, He Z, Zhai G, Liu Y, Sun Y. Highly efficient editing of the actinorhodin polyketide chain length factor gene in Streptomyces coelicolor M145 using CRISPR/Cas9-CodA(sm) combined system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(24):10575–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6931-4. · DOI
  50. McAllister KN, Bouillaut L, Kahn JN, Self WT, Sorg JA. Using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing to generate C. difficile mutants defective in selenoproteins synthesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14672. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15236-5. · DOI
  51. Wang S, Dong S, Wang P, Tao Y, Wang Y. Genome editing in Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 with the CRISPR-Cas9 System. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00233-17. · DOI
  52. Nagaraju S, Davies NK, Walker DJ, Kopke M, Simpson SD. Genome editing of Clostridium autoethanogenum using CRISPR/Cas9. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0638-3. · DOI
  53. Su T, Liu F, Gu P, Jin H, Chang Y, Wang Q, Qi Q. A CRISPR-Cas9 assisted non-homologous end-joining strategy for one-step engineering of bacterial genome. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37895. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37895. · DOI
  54. Tong Y, Charusanti P, Zhang L, Weber T, Lee SY. CRISPR-Cas9 based engineering of actinomycetal genomes. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4(9):1020–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00038. · DOI
  55. Song X, Huang H, Xiong Z, Ai L, Yang S. CRISPR-Cas 9(D10A) nickase-assisted genome editing in Lactobacillus casei. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01259-17. · DOI
  56. Li Q, Chen J, Minton NP, Zhang Y, Wen Z, Liu J, Yang S. CRISPR-based genome editing and expression control systems in Clostridium acetobutylicum and Clostridium beijerinckii. Biotechnol J. 2016;11(7):961–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600053. · DOI
  57. Li K, Cai D, Wang Z, He Z, Chen S. Development of an efficient genome editing tool in Bacillus licheniformis using CRISPR-Cas9 NICKASE. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02608-17. · DOI
  58. Xu T, Li Y, Shi Z, Hemme CL, Li Y, Zhu Y, Zhou J. Efficient genome editing in Clostridium cellulolyticum via CRISPR-Cas9 nickase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(13):4423–31. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00873-15. · DOI
  59. Park J, Shin H, Lee SM, Um Y, Woo HM. RNA-guided single/double gene repressions in Corynebacterium glutamicum using an efficient CRISPR interference and its application to industrial strain. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0843-1. · DOI
  60. Wang Y, Zhang ZT, Seo SO, Lynn P, Lu T, Jin YS, Blaschek HP. Gene transcription repression in Clostridium beijerinckii using CRISPR-dCas9. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113(12):2739–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26020. · DOI
  61. Westbrook AW, Moo-Young M, Chou CP. Development of a CRISPR-Cas9 tool kit for comprehensive engineering of Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(16):4876–95. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01159-16. · DOI
  62. Choudhary E, Thakur P, Pareek M, Agarwal N. Gene silencing by CRISPR interference in mycobacteria. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6267. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7267. · DOI
  63. Singh AK, Carette X, Potluri LP, Sharp JD, Xu R, Prisic S, Husson RN. Investigating essential gene function in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using an efficient CRISPR interference system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(18):e143. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw625. · DOI
  64. Elhadi D, Lv L, Jiang XR, Wu H, Chen GQ. CRISPRi engineering E. coli for morphology diversification. Metab Eng. 2016;38:358–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2016.09.001. · DOI
  65. Peters JM, Colavin A, Shi H, Czarny TL, Larson MH, Wong S, Gross CA. A comprehensive, CRISPR-based functional analysis of essential genes in bacteria. Cell. 2016;165(6):1493–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.003. · DOI
  66. Cleto S, Jensen JV, Wendisch VF, Lu TK. Corynebacterium glutamicum metabolic engineering with CRISPR interference (CRISPRi). ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5(5):375–85. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00216. · DOI
  67. Kim SK, Han GH, Seong W, Kim H, Kim SW, Lee DH, Lee SG. CRISPR interference-guided balancing of a biosynthetic mevalonate pathway increases terpenoid production. Metab Eng. 2016;38:228–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2016.08.006. · DOI
  68. Lv L, Ren YL, Chen JC, Wu Q, Chen GQ. Application of CRISPRi for prokaryotic metabolic engineering involving multiple genes, a case study: controllable P(3HB-co-4HB) biosynthesis. Metab Eng. 2015;29:160–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.03.013. · DOI
  69. Liang JL, Guo LQ, Lin JF, He ZQ, Cai FJ, Chen JF. A novel process for obtaining pinosylvin using combinatorial bioengineering in Escherichia coli. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32(6):102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2062-z. · DOI
  70. Cress BF, Leitz QD, Kim DC, Amore TD, Suzuki JY, Linhardt RJ, Koffas MA. CRISPRi-mediated metabolic engineering of E. coli for O-methylated anthocyanin production. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0623-3. · DOI
  71. Gao C, Wang S, Hu G, Guo L, Chen X, Xu P, Liu L. Engineering Escherichia coli for malate production by integrating modular pathway characterization with CRISPRi-guided multiplexed metabolic tuning. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115(3):661–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26486. · DOI
  72. Kim SK, Seong W, Han GH, Lee DH, Lee SG. CRISPR interference-guided multiplex repression of endogenous competing pathway genes for redirecting metabolic flux in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0802-x. · DOI
  73. Wu J, Zhou P, Zhang X, Dong M. Efficient de novo synthesis of resveratrol by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44(7):1083–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-017-1937-9. · DOI
  74. Wu MY, Sung LY, Li H, Huang CH, Hu YC. Combining CRISPR and CRISPRi systems for metabolic engineering of E. coli and 1,4-BDO biosynthesis. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6(12):2350–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00251. · DOI
  75. Heo MJ, Jung HM, Um J, Lee SW, Oh MK. Controlling citrate synthase expression by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for n-butanol production in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6(2):182–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00134. · DOI
  76. Wu J, Du G, Chen J, Zhou J. Enhancing flavonoid production by systematically tuning the central metabolic pathways based on a CRISPR interference system in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13477. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13477. · DOI
  77. Eid A, Alshareef S, Mahfouz MM. CRISPR base editors: genome editing without double-stranded breaks. Biochem J. 2018;475(11):1955–64. https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20170793. · DOI
  78. Kim JS. Precision genome engineering through adenine and cytosine base editing. Nat Plants. 2018;4(3):148–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0115-z. · DOI
  79. Komor AC, Badran AH, Liu DR. CRISPR-based technologies for the manipulation of eukaryotic genomes. Cell. 2017;168(1–2):20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.044. · DOI
  80. Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu J, Guo Y, Fan L, Ni X, Ma Y. MACBETH: multiplex automated Corynebacterium glutamicum base editing method. Metab Eng. 2018;47:200–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2018.02.016. · DOI
  81. Chen W, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Pi Y, Gu T, Song L, Ji Q. CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and cytidine deaminase-mediated base editing in Pseudomonas species. iScience. 2018;6:222–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.07.024. · DOI
  82. Wang Y, Wang S, Chen W, Song L, Zhang Y, Shen Z, Ji Q. CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-assisted cytidine deaminase enable precise and efficient genome editing in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01834-18. · DOI
  83. Gu T, Zhao S, Pi Y, Chen W, Chen C, Liu Q, Ji Q. Highly efficient base editing in Staphylococcus aureus using an engineered CRISPR RNA-guided cytidine deaminase. Chem Sci. 2018;9(12):3248–53. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sc00637g. · DOI
  84. Zhao D, Li J, Li S, Xin X, Hu M, Price MA, Zhang X. New base editors change C to A in bacteria and C to G in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0592-2. · DOI
  85. Murugan K, Babu K, Sundaresan R, Rajan R, Sashital DG. The revolution continues: newly discovered systems expand the CRISPR-Cas Toolkit. Mol Cell. 2017;68(1):15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.007. · DOI
  86. Liu L, Chen P, Wang M, Li X, Wang J, Yin M, Wang Y. C2c1-sgRNA complex structure reveals RNA-guided DNA cleavage mechanism. Mol Cell. 2017;65(2):310–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.040. · DOI
  87. Zhang J, Hong W, Zong W, Wang P, Wang Y. Markerless genome editing in Clostridium beijerinckii using the CRISPR-Cpf1 system. J Biotechnol. 2018;284:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.040. · DOI
  88. Li L, Wei K, Zheng G, Liu X, Chen S, Jiang W, Lu Y. CRISPR-Cpf1-assisted multiplex genome editing and transcriptional repression in streptomyces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00827-18. · DOI
  89. Hong W, Zhang J, Cui G, Wang L, Wang Y. Multiplexed CRISPR-Cpf1-mediated genome editing in clostridium difficile toward the understanding of pathogenesis of C. difficile infection. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7(6):1588–600. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.8b00087. · DOI
  90. Ao X, Yao Y, Li T, Yang TT, Dong X, Zheng ZT, Guo Y. A multiplex genome editing method for Escherichia coli based on CRISPR-Cas12a. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02307. · DOI
  91. Jiang Y, Qian F, Yang J, Liu Y, Dong F, Xu C, Yang S. CRISPR-Cpf1 assisted genome editing of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15179. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15179. · DOI
  92. Sun B, Yang J, Yang S, Ye RD, Chen D, Jiang Y. A CRISPR-Cpf1-assisted non-homologous end joining genome editing system of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biotechnol J. 2018;13(9):e1700588. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700588. · DOI
  93. Zhang X, Wang J, Cheng Q, Zheng X, Zhao G, Wang J. Multiplex gene regulation by CRISPR-ddCpf1. Cell Discov. 2017;3:17018. https://doi.org/10.1038/celldisc.2017.18. · DOI
  94. Paul B, Montoya G. CRISPR-Cas12a: functional overview and applications. Biomed J. 2020;43(1):8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.10.005. · DOI · Paper page
  95. Zhang JL, Peng YZ, Liu D, Liu H, Cao YX, Li BZ, Yuan YJ. Gene repression via multiplex gRNA strategy in Y. lipolytica. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0909-8. · DOI
  96. Stachler AE, Marchfelder A. Gene repression in haloarchaea using the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas I-B system. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(29):15226–42. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.724062. · DOI
  97. Cheng F, Gong L, Zhao D, Yang H, Zhou J, Li M, Xiang H. Harnessing the native type I-B CRISPR-Cas for genome editing in a polyploid archaeon. J Genet Genomics. 2017;44(11):541–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2017.09.010. · DOI
  98. Zhang J, Zong W, Hong W, Zhang ZT, Wang Y. Exploiting endogenous CRISPR-Cas system for multiplex genome editing in Clostridium tyrobutyricum and engineer the strain for high-level butanol production. Metab Eng. 2018;47:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2018.03.007. · DOI
  99. Richter H, Rompf J, Wiegel J, Rau K, Randau L. Fragmentation of the CRISPR-Cas Type I-B signature protein Cas8b. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2017;1861(11 Pt B):2993–3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.02.026. · DOI
  100. Chang Y, Su T, Qi Q, Liang Q. Easy regulation of metabolic flux in Escherichia coli using an endogenous type I–E CRISPR-Cas system. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15(1):195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0594-4. · DOI
  101. Tarasava K, Liu R, Garst A, Gill RT. Combinatorial pathway engineering using type I-E CRISPR interference. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115(7):1878–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26589. · DOI
  102. You L, Ma J, Wang J, Artamonova D, Wang M, Liu L, Wang Y. Structure studies of the CRISPR-Csm complex reveal mechanism of co-transcriptional interference. Cell. 2019;176(1–2):239–253 e216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.052. · DOI
  103. Taylor DW, Zhu Y, Staals RH, Kornfeld JE, Shinkai A, van der Oost J, Nogales E, Doudna JA. Structures of the CRISPR-Cmr complex reveal mode of RNA target positioning. Science. 2015;348:581–5. · DOI
  104. Makarova KS, Aravind L, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct. 2011;6:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-38. · DOI
  105. Guan J, Wang W, Sun B. Chromosomal targeting by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system can reshape genomes in Staphylococcus aureus. mSphere. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00403-17. · DOI
  106. Gao Z, Herrera-Carrillo E, Berkhout B. Improvement of the CRISPR-Cpf1 system with ribozyme-processed crRNA. RNA Biol. 2018;15(12):1458–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2018.1551703. · DOI
  107. Kleinstiver BP, Sousa AA, Walton RT, Tak YE, Hsu JY, Clement K, Joung JK. Engineered CRISPR-Cas12a variants with increased activities and improved targeting ranges for gene, epigenetic and base editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(3):276–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-018-0011-0. · DOI
  108. Wang L, Wang H, Liu H, Zhao Q, Liu B, Wang L, Luo Y. Improved CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted one-pot DNA editing method enables seamless DNA editing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116(6):1463–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26938. · DOI
  109. Teng F, Cui T, Feng G, Guo L, Xu K, Gao Q, Li W. Repurposing CRISPR-Cas12b for mammalian genome engineering. Cell Discov. 2018;4:63. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-018-0069-3. · DOI
  110. Liu JJ, Orlova N, Oakes BL, Ma E, Spinner HB, Baney KLM, Doudna JA. CasX enzymes comprise a distinct family of RNA-guided genome editors. Nature. 2019;566(7743):218–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0908-x. · DOI · Paper page
  111. Wu J, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Tan Q, He J, Dong M. Rational modular design of metabolic network for efficient production of plant polyphenol pinosylvin. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01700-9. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Z., Dong, H., Cui, Y., Cong, L., & Zhang, D.
ORCID
Zhang, Dawei
Venue
Microbial Cell Factories
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
ISSN
1475-2859
DOI
10.1186/s12934-020-01431-z
PMC
PMC7470686
Cited by
185
References
8
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 31800086)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review