Cited by 70Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentPublic Health Policies and Education

Measurement of sustainment of prevention programs and initiatives: the sustainment measurement system scale

Open access
Palinkas, Lawrence A., Chou, Chih-Ping, Spear, Suzanne E., Mendon, Sapna J., Villamar, Juan, Brown, C. Hendricks·2020·Implementation Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhancing the sustainability of evidence-based prevention programs for mental and behavioral health requires tools for measuring both sustainability determinants and sustainment outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop the Sustainment Measurement System Scale (SMSS) and to assess its reliability and construct validity for measuring both determinants and outcomes of efforts to sustain prevention programs and initiatives. METHODS: A 42-item scale comprised of items identified from qualitative data collected from 45 representatives of 10 programs and 8 SAMHSA program officers was administered to 186 representatives of 145 programs funded by 7 SAMHSA prevention grant initiatives. Cronbach's alphas were used to determine inter-item reliability. Convergent validity was assessed by comparisons of a global measure of sustainment with current SAMHSA-funding status and continued operation in the same form. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparisons of sustainability determinants with whether or not the program had undergone adaptations. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis provided support for a 35-item model fit to the data. Cronbach's alpha was .84 for the sustainment outcome construct and ranged from .70 to .93 for the sustainability determinant constructs. All of the determinant constructs were significantly associated with sustainment outcome individual and global measures for the entire sample (p < 0.01 to 0.001) and for community-based programs and programs with a substance abuse focus (p < 0.05 to 0.001). Convergent validity was supported by significant associations between the global sustainment measure and current SAMHSA funding status and continued operation in the same form (p < 0.001). Four of the sustainability determinant constructs (responsive to community needs; coalitions, partnerships, and networks; organizational staff capability; and evaluation, feedback, and program outcomes) were also significantly associated with current SAMHSA funding status (p < 0.5 to 0.01). With the exception of organizational staff capability, all sustainability determinants were unrelated to program adaptation as predicted. CONCLUSIONS: The SMSS demonstrated good reliability and convergent and discriminant validity in assessing likelihood of sustainment of SAMHSA funded prevention programs and initiatives. The measure demonstrates potential in identifying predictors of program sustainment and as a tool for enhancing the likelihood of successful sustainment through ongoing evaluation and feedback.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-020-01030-x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PSAT is both pragmatic and generalizable to different settings and amongst those in different roles, including both practitioners and research team members.

    “While there have been other measures developed for sustainability capacity in certain areas or to assess sustainment, this capacity focused measure is both pragmatic and generalizable to different settings and amongst those in different roles, including both practitioners and research team members (5).”

    From Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Background (page unavailable) identifies the PSAT as a tool for assessing public-health programs’ capacity for sustainability. It does not say the PSAT is pragmatic or generalizable across settings and roles; the Conclusion’s discussion of broader applicability concerns the SMSS, not the PSAT. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [25]Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health care system for the 21st century 2001 Washington National Academies Press
  2. [26]Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America: Performance measurement: accelerating improvement 2006 Washington DC National Academies Press
  3. [54]Nunnally JC Psychometric theory 1978 2 New York McGraw Hill
  4. [55]Nunnally JC Bernstein IH Psychometric theory 1994 3 New York McGraw Hill

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palinkas, L. A., Chou, C.-P., Spear, S. E., Mendon, S. J., Villamar, J., & Brown, C. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • California State University, Northridge (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Palinkas, Lawrence A.
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
71-71
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082245953
Cited by
70
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R34 DA037516-01A1, P30 DA02878)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
program sustainment, prevention programs, scale development, mental health prevention, sustainability determinants, program adaptation, assessment and feedback, community-based programs, substance use prevention
MeSH terms
Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, United States, United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Reproducibility of Results, Program Evaluation, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review