Cited by 158Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PU.1 regulates Alzheimer’s disease-associated genes in primary human microglia

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microglia play critical roles in the brain during homeostasis and pathological conditions. Understanding the molecular events underpinning microglial functions and activation states will further enable us to target these cells for the treatment of neurological disorders. The transcription factor PU.1 is critical in the development of myeloid cells and a major regulator of microglial gene expression. In the brain, PU.1 is specifically expressed in microglia and recent evidence from genome-wide association studies suggests that reductions in PU.1 contribute to a delayed onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD), possibly through limiting neuroinflammatory responses. METHODS: To investigate how PU.1 contributes to immune activation in human microglia, microarray analysis was performed on primary human mixed glial cultures subjected to siRNA-mediated knockdown of PU.1. Microarray hits were confirmed by qRT-PCR and immunocytochemistry in both mixed glial cultures and isolated microglia following PU.1 knockdown. To identify attenuators of PU.1 expression in microglia, high throughput drug screening was undertaken using a compound library containing FDA-approved drugs. NanoString and immunohistochemistry was utilised to investigate the expression of PU.1 itself and PU.1-regulated mediators in primary human brain tissue derived from neurologically normal and clinically and pathologically confirmed cases of AD. RESULTS: Bioinformatic analysis of gene expression upon PU.1 silencing in mixed glial cultures revealed a network of modified AD-associated microglial genes involved in the innate and adaptive immune systems, particularly those involved in antigen presentation and phagocytosis. These gene changes were confirmed using isolated microglial cultures. Utilising high throughput screening of FDA-approved compounds in mixed glial cultures we identified the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat as an effective attenuator of PU.1 expression in human microglia. Further characterisation of vorinostat in isolated microglial cultures revealed gene and protein changes partially recapitulating those seen following siRNA-mediated PU.1 knockdown. Lastly, we demonstrate that several of these PU.1-regulated genes are expressed by microglia in the human AD brain in situ. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these results suggest that attenuating PU.1 may be a valid therapeutic approach to limit microglial-mediated inflammatory responses in AD and demonstrate utility of vorinostat for this purpose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13024-018-0277-1

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Characterisation of culture conditions for microarray analysis. a Characterisation of primary human mixed glial cultures comprised of pericytes (PDGFRβ), microglia (PU.1), astrocytes (GFAP), and endothelial cells (PECAM1), compared with pericyte-only cultures containing PDGFRβ only, scale bar = 100 μm. b PU.1 knockdown in mixed glial cultures transfected with 50 nM scrambled or PU.1 siRNA for 7 days, scale bar = 100 μm. c Microarray analysis of cell specific genes in scrambled siRNA transfected mixed glial cultures or pericyte-only cultures. d Unbiased hierarchical clustering of the top 250 differentially expressed genes from microarray analysis of mixed glial cultures or pericyte cultures transfected with 50 nM scrambled or PU.1 siRNA for 7 days, n = 3 independent microglial cultures
Fig. 1 Characterisation of culture conditions for microarray analysis. a Characterisation of primary human mixed glial cultures comprised of pericytes (PDGFRβ), microglia (PU.1), astrocytes (GFAP), and endothelial cells (PECAM1), compared with pericyte-only cultures containing PDGFRβ only, scale bar = 100 μm. b PU.1 knockdown in mixed glial cultures transfected with 50 nM scrambled or PU.1 siRNA for 7 days, scale bar = 100 μm. c Microarray analysis of cell specific genes in scrambled siRNA transfected mixed glial cultures or pericyte-only cultures. d Unbiased hierarchical clustering of the top 250 differentially expressed genes from microarray analysis of mixed glial cultures or pericyte cultures transfected with 50 nM scrambled or PU.1 siRNA for 7 days, n = 3 independent microglial culturesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Microarray analysis of PU.1 silencing. a Heatmap generation of the top 180 differentially expressed genes (log2 fold change > 1.5, adjusted p-value < 0.001) with PU.1 siRNA versus control siRNA in mixed glial cultures. Corresponding changes in pericyte-only cultures are shown. b, c Venn diagrams revealing 51 upregulated genes by PU.1 silencing, 26 of which were specific to mixed glial cultures and 129 downregulated genes, 122 of which were specific to mixed glial cultures. d, e Volcano plots displaying log2 fold change versus –log adjusted p-value for all genes (grey) and genes of interest displaying significant reduction (dark red), mild reductions (light red), no change (black), mild induction (light green), or significant induction (dark green) in mixed glial cultures or pericyte only cultures. f Validation of selected genes by qRT-PCR (n = 3 independent microglial cultures) in mixed glial cultures transfected with 50 nM PU.1 siRNA versus control siRNA for 7 days, colour coded by their significance from microarray analysis. Data is displayed as fold change of mRNA genes in PU.1 siRNA treated cultures relative to control siRNA samples as determined by the 2^-ΔΔCt method (g) Log2 fold changes between microarray and qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated good correlation (R2 = 0.75)
Fig. 2 Microarray analysis of PU.1 silencing. a Heatmap generation of the top 180 differentially expressed genes (log2 fold change > 1.5, adjusted p-value < 0.001) with PU.1 siRNA versus control siRNA in mixed glial cultures. Corresponding changes in pericyte-only cultures are shown. b, c Venn diagrams revealing 51 upregulated genes by PU.1 silencing, 26 of which were specific to mixed glial cultures and 129 downregulated genes, 122 of which were specific to mixed glial cultures. d, e Volcano plots displaying log2 fold change versus –log adjusted p-value for all genes (grey) and genes of interest displaying significant reduction (dark red), mild reductions (light red), no change (black), mild induction (light green), or significant induction (dark green) in mixed glial cultures or pericyte only cultures. f Validation of selected genes by qRT-PCR (n = 3 independent microglial cultures) in mixed glial cultures transfected with 50 nM PU.1 siRNA versus control siRNA for 7 days, colour coded by their significance from microarray analysis. Data is displayed as fold change of mRNA genes in PU.1 siRNA treated cultures relative to control siRNA samples as determined by the 2^-ΔΔCt method (g) Log2 fold changes between microarray and qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated good correlation (R2 = 0.75)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Bioinformatic analysis reveals PU.1 as a highly connected hub protein involved in innate and adaptive immunity. a STRING protein-protein interaction network of the top 102 differentially expressed genes specific to mixed glial cultures with PU.1 knockdown implicates PU.1 as a central regulator of altered genes. b Gene ontology analysis demonstrating that PU.1-regulated genes are involved in innate and adaptive immune biological processes. c The majority of PU.1 regulated genes are localized to the extracellular region, MHCII complexes, or aspects of various endocytic pathways. d Molecular functions involved in antigen presentation and actin filament binding were altered by PU.1 silencing
Fig. 3 Bioinformatic analysis reveals PU.1 as a highly connected hub protein involved in innate and adaptive immunity. a STRING protein-protein interaction network of the top 102 differentially expressed genes specific to mixed glial cultures with PU.1 knockdown implicates PU.1 as a central regulator of altered genes. b Gene ontology analysis demonstrating that PU.1-regulated genes are involved in innate and adaptive immune biological processes. c The majority of PU.1 regulated genes are localized to the extracellular region, MHCII complexes, or aspects of various endocytic pathways. d Molecular functions involved in antigen presentation and actin filament binding were altered by PU.1 silencingCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Confirmation of microarray analysis in isolated human brain microglia. a Isolated microglia cultures transfected for 7 days with 50 nM PU.1 siRNA show no change in overall cell number (p > 0.05), (b) no change in the percentage of microglial cells (p > 0.05), (c) efficient knockdown of PU.1 (p < 0.001), (d, g) reduced expression of DAP12 (p < 0.001) and HLA-DR, DP, DQ (p < 0.01) but not CD45 (p > 0.05), (e) non-significant induction in roundness factor (p > 0.0.5), and (f) reduced elongation factor (p < 0.001) compared to a scrambled siRNA control, n = 3–5 independent microglial cultures, scale bar = 100 μm. h qRT-PCR validation of selected genes in isolated microglia cultures transfected with 50 nM PU.1 siRNA versus control siRNA for 7 days, colour coded by their significance from microarray analysis, (i) displayed a significant correlation to changes observed in mixed glial cultures (R2 = 0.55), n = 3 independent microglial cultures. Data is displayed as fold change of mRNA genes in PU.1 siRNA treated cultures relative to control siRNA samples as determined by the 2^-ΔΔCt method. Cytokine secretions from isolated microglia cultures transfected with 50 nM PU.1 siRNA versus control siRNA for 6 days followed by stimulation with vehicle or 10 ng/mL LPS for a further 24 h demonstrated no effect of PU.1 silencing on LPS-induced (j) IL-1β (p > 0.05), (k) TNFα (p > 0.05), (l) IL-6 (p > 0.05), (m) MCP-1 (p > 0.05) but a reduction in (n) IL-8 (p < 0.001). Please note that this is one representative result of three independent experiments. NS = p > 0.05, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, Students t test
Fig. 4 Confirmation of microarray analysis in isolated human brain microglia. a Isolated microglia cultures transfected for 7 days with 50 nM PU.1 siRNA show no change in overall cell number (p > 0.05), (b) no change in the percentage of microglial cells (p > 0.05), (c) efficient knockdown of PU.1 (p < 0.001), (d, g) reduced expression of DAP12 (p < 0.001) and HLA-DR, DP, DQ (p < 0.01) but not CD45 (p > 0.05), (e) non-significant induction in roundness factor (p > 0.0.5), and (f) reduced elongation factor (p < 0.001) compared to a scrambled siRNA control, n = 3–5 independent microglial cultures, scale bar = 100 μm. h qRT-PCR validation of selected genes in isolated microglia cultures transfected with 50 nM PU.1 siRNA versus control siRNA for 7 days, colour coded by their significance from microarray analysis, (i) displayed a significant correlation to changes observed in mixed glial cultures (R2 = 0.55), n = 3 independent microglial cultures. Data is displayed as fold change of mRNA genes in PU.1 siRNA treated cultures relative to control siRNA samples as determined by the 2^-ΔΔCt method. Cytokine secretions from isolated microglia cultures transfected with 50 nM PU.1 siRNA versus control siRNA for 6 days followed by stimulation with vehicle or 10 ng/mL LPS for a further 24 h demonstrated no effect of PU.1 silencing on LPS-induced (j) IL-1β (p > 0.05), (k) TNFα (p > 0.05), (l) IL-6 (p > 0.05), (m) MCP-1 (p > 0.05) but a reduction in (n) IL-8 (p < 0.001). Please note that this is one representative result of three independent experiments. NS = p > 0.05, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, Students t testCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 PU.1-regulated proteins demonstrate microglial expression in the human AD brain. NanoString gene expression analysis of selected microglial genes reveals induction of (a) SPI1 (p < 0.001), (b) TYROBP (p < 0.001), (c) HLA-DRA (p < 0.001), (d) TREM2 (p < 0.05), (e) PTPRC (p < 0.001), and (f) AIF1 (p < 0.01) in human brain MFG tissue derived from neurologically normal (n = 8) or clinically and pathologically confirmed AD tissue (n = 8). Representative images demonstrating microglial localisation of (g) DAP12, (h) HLA-DR, DP, DQ, (i) TREM2, and (j) CD45 with IBA1 in the control and AD brain. Scale bar = 200 μm, inset = 20 μm. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, Students t test
Fig. 5 PU.1-regulated proteins demonstrate microglial expression in the human AD brain. NanoString gene expression analysis of selected microglial genes reveals induction of (a) SPI1 (p < 0.001), (b) TYROBP (p < 0.001), (c) HLA-DRA (p < 0.001), (d) TREM2 (p < 0.05), (e) PTPRC (p < 0.001), and (f) AIF1 (p < 0.01) in human brain MFG tissue derived from neurologically normal (n = 8) or clinically and pathologically confirmed AD tissue (n = 8). Representative images demonstrating microglial localisation of (g) DAP12, (h) HLA-DR, DP, DQ, (i) TREM2, and (j) CD45 with IBA1 in the control and AD brain. Scale bar = 200 μm, inset = 20 μm. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, Students t testCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 High throughput drug screening identified vorinostat as an effective inhibitor of PU.1 that partially mimics the effects of PU.1 silencing. a High throughput drug screening using a drug library containing 1280 FDA-approved compounds at 10 μM for 48 h in mixed glial cultures. ICC and automated image analysis identified the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat as a candidate drug for PU.1 reduction. Please note that this screening experiment was performed using one biological sample. b Confirmation of the PU.1 inhibitory effect (p < 0.001) of 10 μM vorinostat for 48 h in additional mixed glial cultures analysed by ICC and automated image analysis and (c) a mild reduction (p < 0.05) in total cell number (c), n = 2. d ICC analysis demonstrating loss of nuclear PU.1 expression with vorinostat treatment in CD45+ microglia, scale bar = 100 μm. Isolated microglia cultures treated for 24 h with 10 μM vorinostat show (e) a reduction in cell number (p < 0.001), (f) no change in the percentage of microglial cells (p > 0.05), (g, k) efficient knockdown of PU.1 (p < 0.001), (h, k) reduced expression of DAP12 (p < 0.01) but not HLA-DR, DP, DQ (p > 0.05) or CD45 (p > 0.05), and no change in (i) roundness factor or (j) elongation factor compared to vehicle treatment, n = 3–5, scale bar = 100 μm. (l, m) Determination of gene changes following a 24 h treatment with 10 μM vorinostat demonstrated a modest correlation (R2 = 0.47) with genes altered by PU.1 silencing in isolated microglia cultures, n = 3 independent microglial cultures. Data is displayed as fold change of mRNA genes in vorinostat treated cultures relative to vehicle treated samples as determined by the 2^-ΔΔCt method. NS = p > 0.05, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, Students t test
Fig. 6 High throughput drug screening identified vorinostat as an effective inhibitor of PU.1 that partially mimics the effects of PU.1 silencing. a High throughput drug screening using a drug library containing 1280 FDA-approved compounds at 10 μM for 48 h in mixed glial cultures. ICC and automated image analysis identified the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat as a candidate drug for PU.1 reduction. Please note that this screening experiment was performed using one biological sample. b Confirmation of the PU.1 inhibitory effect (p < 0.001) of 10 μM vorinostat for 48 h in additional mixed glial cultures analysed by ICC and automated image analysis and (c) a mild reduction (p < 0.05) in total cell number (c), n = 2. d ICC analysis demonstrating loss of nuclear PU.1 expression with vorinostat treatment in CD45+ microglia, scale bar = 100 μm. Isolated microglia cultures treated for 24 h with 10 μM vorinostat show (e) a reduction in cell number (p < 0.001), (f) no change in the percentage of microglial cells (p > 0.05), (g, k) efficient knockdown of PU.1 (p < 0.001), (h, k) reduced expression of DAP12 (p < 0.01) but not HLA-DR, DP, DQ (p > 0.05) or CD45 (p > 0.05), and no change in (i) roundness factor or (j) elongation factor compared to vehicle treatment, n = 3–5, scale bar = 100 μm. (l, m) Determination of gene changes following a 24 h treatment with 10 μM vorinostat demonstrated a modest correlation (R2 = 0.47) with genes altered by PU.1 silencing in isolated microglia cultures, n = 3 independent microglial cultures. Data is displayed as fold change of mRNA genes in vorinostat treated cultures relative to vehicle treated samples as determined by the 2^-ΔΔCt method. NS = p > 0.05, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, Students t testCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Schematic identifying the contribution of PU.1 to microglial processes. Microglia contain several cell surface receptors implicated in the recognition of various antigenic matter including stressed-but-viable neurons, bacterial and viral pathogens, and misfolded proteins including Aβ1–42. PU.1 silencing in microglia attenuated the expression of receptors involved in phagocytic recognition (TREM2, DAP12, FCGR3A, MRC1, and CLEC7A), antigen processing (CD74, CTSS, and CYBB), and antigen presentation (HLA-DMB, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DRA) and can be pharmacologically reduced by vorinostat. FCγR = Fc gamma receptor, TCR = T-cell receptor
Fig. 7 Schematic identifying the contribution of PU.1 to microglial processes. Microglia contain several cell surface receptors implicated in the recognition of various antigenic matter including stressed-but-viable neurons, bacterial and viral pathogens, and misfolded proteins including Aβ1–42. PU.1 silencing in microglia attenuated the expression of receptors involved in phagocytic recognition (TREM2, DAP12, FCGR3A, MRC1, and CLEC7A), antigen processing (CD74, CTSS, and CYBB), and antigen presentation (HLA-DMB, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DRA) and can be pharmacologically reduced by vorinostat. FCγR = Fc gamma receptor, TCR = T-cell receptorCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 83 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–158 of 158

Metadata

Authors
Rustenhoven, J., Smith, A. M., Smyth, L. C., Jansson, D., Scotter, E. L., Swanson, M. E. V., Aalderink, M., Coppieters, N., Narayan, P., Handley, R., Overall, C., Park, T. I. H., Schweder, P., Heppner, P., Curtis, M. A., Faull, R. L. M., & Dragunow, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Dragunow, Mike
Venue
Molecular Neurodegeneration
Published
2018-08-20
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
44-44
ISSN
1750-1326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888188888
Cited by
155
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Neurodegeneration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Hugh Green Foundation
  • Neurological Foundation of New Zealand
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
PU.1, Alzheimer's disease, microglia, transcription factors, neuroinflammation, vorinostat, histone deacetylase inhibitors, microglial gene expression, antigen presentation, phagocytosis, mixed glial cultures, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Vorinostat, Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Alzheimer Disease, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Trans-Activators, Microglia, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review