The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of Tissue engineering is a regeneration or replacement of tissues or organs damaged by disease, injury, or congenital anomalies. At present, Tissue engineering repairs damaged tissues and organs with artificial supporting structures called scaffolds. These are used for attachment and subsequent growth of appropriate cells. During the cell growth gradual biodegradation of the scaffold occurs and the final product is a new tissue with the desired shape and properties. In recent years, research workplaces are focused on developing scaffold by bio-fabrication techniques to achieve fast, precise and cheap automatic manufacturing of these structures. Most promising techniques seem to be Rapid prototyping due to its high level of precision and controlling. However, this technique is still to solve various issues before it is easily used for scaffold fabrication. In this article we tested printing of clinically applicable scaffolds with use of commercially available devices and materials. Research presented in this article is in general focused on "scaffolding" on a field of bone tissue replacement. RESULTS: Commercially available 3D printer and Polylactic acid were used to create originally designed and possibly suitable scaffold structures for bone tissue engineering. We tested printing of scaffolds with different geometrical structures. Based on the osteosarcoma cells proliferation experiment and mechanical testing of designed scaffold samples, it will be stated that it is likely not necessary to keep the recommended porosity of the scaffold for bone tissue replacement at about 90%, and it will also be clarified why this fact eliminates mechanical properties issue. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the size of an individual pore could be double the size of the recommended range between 0.2-0.35 mm without affecting the cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Rapid prototyping technique based on Fused deposition modelling was used for the fabrication of designed scaffold structures. All the experiments were performed in order to show how to possibly solve certain limitations and issues that are currently reported by research workplaces on the field of scaffold bio-fabrication. These results should provide new valuable knowledge for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Organization for Standardization
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_16847 · Cited by 12,534
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
Karageorgiou, V., & Kaplan, D. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · Cited by 6,622
The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors
Yang, S., Leong, K.-F., Du, Z., & Chua, C.-K. (2001) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632701753337645 · Cited by 2,234
Poly(lactic acid) modifications
Rasal, R. M., Janorkar, A. V., & Hirt, D. E. (2010) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003 · Cited by 2,204
Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells
Kilian, K. A., Bugarija, B., Lahn, B. T., & Mrksich, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903269107 · Cited by 1,841
Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering
CSIRO Molecular Science, B. 1., & Gunatillake, P. (2003) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v005a01 · Cited by 1,765 · cited 2×
“Besides this, modification with inorganic compounds or proteins follow in order to tailor physico-chemico properties and to improve cell growth or differentiation [4, 17, 21, 22].”
BackgroundMethodRecent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials
Chia, H. N., & Wu, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 · Cited by 1,734
Hutmacher, D. W., Sittinger, M., & Risbud, M. V. (2004) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005 · Cited by 1,121
Bacakova, L., Filova, E., Parizek, M., Ruml, T., & Svorcik, V. (2011) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004 · Cited by 1,000
Scaffold Design for Bone Regeneration
Polo-Corrales, L., Latorre-Esteves, M., & Ramirez-Vick, J. E. (2014) · Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1166/jnn.2014.9127 · Cited by 945
Cited by
Scaffold Techniques and Designs in Tissue Engineering Functions and Purposes: A Review
Eltom, A., Zhong, G., & Muhammad, A. (2019) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2019/3429527 · Cited by 615
Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair
Wei, S., Ma, J.-X., Xu, L., Gu, X.-S., & Ma, X.-L. (2020) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-020-00280-6 · Cited by 406
Hassanajili, S., Karami-Pour, A., Oryan, A., & Talaei-Khozani, T. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109960 · Cited by 346
Natural and Synthetic Polymers for Bone Scaffolds Optimization
Donnaloja, F., Jacchetti, E., Soncini, M., & Raimondi, M. T. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12040905 · Cited by 324
Martin, V., Ribeiro, I. A., Alves, M. M., Gonçalves, L., Claudio, R. A., Grenho, L., Fernandes, M. H., Gomes, P., Santos, C. F., & Bettencourt, A. F. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.056 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregor, A., Filová, E., Novák, M., Kronek, J., Chlup, H., Buzgo, M., Blahnová, V., Lukášová, V., Bartoš, M., Nečas, A., & Hošek, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Engineering
- Published
- 2017-10-16
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-31
- ISSN
- 1754-1611 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2744483079
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 14.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3
- The paper
- Gregor, A., Filová, E., Novák, M., Kronek, J., Chlup, H., Buzgo, M., Blahnová, V., Lukášová, V., Bartoš, M., Nečas, A., & Hošek, J. (2017). Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer. Journal of Biological Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.