Cited by 95Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the peer-delivered Thinking Healthy Programme for perinatal depression in Pakistan and India: the SHARE study protocol for randomised controlled trials

Open access
Sikander, Siham, Lazarus, Anisha, Bangash, Omer, Fuhr, Daniela C., Weobong, Benedict, Krishna, Revathi N., Ahmad, Ikhlaq, Weiss, Helen A. +3 more·2015·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rates of perinatal depression (antenatal and postnatal depression) in South Asia are among the highest in the world. The delivery of effective psychological treatments for perinatal depression through existing health systems is a challenge due to a lack of human resources. This paper reports on a trial protocol that aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Thinking Healthy Programme delivered by peers (Thinking Healthy Programme Peer-delivered; THPP), for women with moderate to severe perinatal depression in rural and urban settings in Pakistan and India. METHODS/DESIGN: THPP is evaluated with two randomised controlled trials: a cluster trial in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and an individually randomised trial in Goa, India. Trial participants are pregnant women who are registered with the lady health workers in the study area in Pakistan and pregnant women attending outpatient antenatal clinics in India. They will be screened using the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression symptoms and will be eligible if their PHQ-9 is equal to or greater than 10 (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). The sample size will be 560 and 280 women in Pakistan and India, respectively. Women in the intervention arm (THPP) will be offered ten individual and four group sessions (Pakistan) or 6-14 individual sessions (India) delivered by a peer (defined as a mother from the same community who is trained and supervised in delivering the intervention). Women in the control arm (enhanced usual care) will receive health care as usual, enhanced by providing the gynaecologist or primary-health facilities with adapted WHO mhGAP guidelines for depression treatment, and providing the woman with her diagnosis and information on how to seek help for herself. The primary outcomes are remission and severity of depression symptoms at the 6-month postnatal follow-up. Secondary outcomes include remission and severity of depression symptoms at the 3-month postnatal follow-up, functional disability, perceived social support, breastfeeding rates, infant height and weight, and costs of health care at the 3- and 6-month postnatal follow-ups. The primary analysis will be intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: The trials have the potential to strengthen the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based psychological treatment recommended by the World Health Organisation and delivered by peers for perinatal depression. The trials have the unique opportunity to overcome the shortage of human resources in global mental health and may advance our understanding about the use of peers who work in partnership with the existing health systems in low-resource settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pakistan Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111915 (9 April 2014) India Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02104232 (1 April 2014).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-015-1063-9

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]WHO mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings 2010 Geneva WHO 23741783

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sikander, S., Lazarus, A., Bangash, O., Fuhr, D. C., Weobong, B., Krishna, R. N., Ahmad, I., Weiss, H. A., Price, L., Rahman, A., & Patel, V.
Affiliations
  • Human Development Research Foundation (PK)
  • Sangath (IN)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Sikander, Siham
Venue
Trials
Published
2015-11-25
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
534-534
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2176196946
Cited by
95
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Wellcome Trust (084674, 091834)
  • National Institutes of Health (U19MH95687)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K012126/1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U19MH095687, U19 MH95687)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
perinatal depression, antenatal depression, postpartum depression, cost-effectiveness, Lady Health Workers, South Asia, maternal mental health, depression remission, breastfeeding, infant growth, social support, functional disability, SHARE survey, Pakistan, India, urban and rural areas, PHQ-9
MeSH terms
Peer Influence, Clinical Protocols, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, India, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Pakistan, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Remission Induction, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Thinking, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Perinatal Care, Depression, Postpartum, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review