Cited by 122Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and AccessGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Psychosocial interventions for perinatal common mental disorders delivered by providers who are not mental health specialists in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Clarke, Kelly, King, Michael, Prost, Audrey·2013·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perinatal common mental disorders (PCMDs) are a major cause of disability among women. Psychosocial interventions are one approach to reduce the burden of PCMDs. Working with care providers who are not mental health specialists, in the community or in antenatal health care facilities, can expand access to these interventions in low-resource settings. We assessed effects of such interventions compared to usual perinatal care, as well as effects of interventions based on intervention type, delivery method, and timing. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. We searched databases including Embase and the Global Health Library (up to 7 July 2013) for randomized and non-randomized trials of psychosocial interventions delivered by non-specialist mental health care providers in community settings and antenatal health care facilities in low- and middle-income countries. We pooled outcomes from ten trials for 18,738 participants. Interventions led to an overall reduction in PCMDs compared to usual care when using continuous data for PCMD symptomatology (effect size [ES] -0.34; 95% CI -0.53, -0.16) but not binary categorizations for presence or absence of PCMDs (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.35, 1.080 [corrected]. We found a significantly larger ES for psychological interventions (three studies; ES -0.46; 95% CI -0.58, -0.33) than for health promotion interventions (seven studies; ES -0.15; 95% CI -0.27, -0.02). Both individual (five studies; ES -0.18; 95% CI -0.34, -0.01) and group (three studies; ES -0.48; 95% CI -0.85, -0.11) interventions were effective compared to usual care, though delivery method was not associated with ES (meta-regression β coefficient -0.11; 95% CI -0.36, 0.14). Combined group and individual interventions (based on two studies) had no benefit compared to usual care, nor did interventions restricted to pregnancy (three studies). Intervention timing was not associated with ES (β 0.16; 95% CI -0.16, 0.49). The small number of trials and heterogeneity of interventions limit our findings. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions delivered by non-specialists are beneficial for PCMDs, especially psychological interventions. Research is needed on interventions in low-income countries, treatment versus preventive approaches, and cost-effectiveness. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001541

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing reviews highlight the effectiveness of a number of interventions for peripartum depression, including medication, health promotion interventions and psychological interventions.

    “Existing reviews highlight the effectiveness of a number of interventions for PPD including medication (eg, antidepressant medication), health promotion interventions (eg, educational home visits) and psychological interventions (eg, cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) and interpersonal therapy.16–27”

    From Effectiveness and acceptability of cognitive-behavioural therapy based interventions for maternal peripartum depression: A systematic review, meta-analysis and thematic synthesis protocol (2019) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results (Comparison 2: Interventions by Type versus Usual Care; page unavailable) find benefits from health promotion and psychological interventions for perinatal common mental disorders, and Intervention Content identifies educational home visits, CBT, and IPT as examples. The review does not establish the effectiveness of antidepressant medication, and its pooled outcomes cover perinatal common mental disorders rather than postpartum depression alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • While half the psychiatric outpatients surveyed reported a positive view of mental health apps, only one in four had ever downloaded an app and only one in ten was currently using an app.

    “While half the psychiatric outpatients surveyed reported a positive view of mental health apps, only one in four had ever downloaded an app and only one in ten was currently using an app. 644”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Goldberg D, Huxley P (1992) Common mental disorders: a biosocial model. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
  2. [14]World Health Organization (2010) mhGAP implementation guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. Geneva: World Health Organization. 23741783
  3. [57]Hughes MW (2008) A randomised controlled trial of a perinatal psycho-social interventoin for postnatal depression in Goa, India [PhD dissertation]. London: Kings College London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, K., King, M., & Prost, A.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2013-10-29
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
e1001541
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2006651096
Cited by
122
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10210)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
psychosocial interventions, community-based intervention, prenatal care, low- and middle-income countries, psychological intervention, health promotion interventions, group intervention, individual interventions, intervention timing, access to mental health care, maternal mental health, postpartum depression, postpartum anxiety, perinatal anxiety
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Psychotherapy, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review