Cited by 38biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications

Effects of poly(L-lactide-ε-caprolactone) and magnesium hydroxide additives on physico-mechanical properties and degradation of poly(L-lactic acid)

Open access
Kang, Eun Young, Lih, Eugene, Kim, Ik Hwan, Joung, Yoon Ki, Han, Dong Keun·2016·Biomaterials Research

Abstract

Background: Biodegradable poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) is one of the most widely used polymer in biomedical devices, but it still has limitations such as inherent brittleness and acidic degradation products. In this work, PLLA blends with poly(L-lactide-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) and Mg(OH) 2 were prepared by the thermal processing to improve their physico-mechanical and thermal properties. In addition, the neutralizing effect of Mg(OH) 2 was evaluated by degradation study. Results: The elongation of PLLA remarkably increased from 3 to 164.4 % and the glass transition temperature (T g ) of PLLA was slightly reduced from 61 to 52 °C by adding PLCL additive. Mg(OH) 2 in polymeric matrix not only improved the molecular weight reduction and mechanical strength of PLLA, but also neutralized the acidic byproducts generated during polyester degradation. Conclusions: Therefore, the results demonstrated that the presence of PLCL and Mg(OH) 2 additives in PLLA matrix could prevent the thermal decomposition and control degradation behavior of polyester.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40824-016-0054-6

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blends of PLLA with PLCL show improved miscibility compared with PLLA/PCL blends.

    “blends of PLLA with poly( L -lactide-coε -caprolactone) (PLCL) have been developed and show improved miscibility [25-27]”

    From Tuning structural relaxations, mechanical properties, and degradation timescale of PLLA during hydrolytic degradation by blending with PLCL-PEG (2019) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Methods section describes fabricating PLLA/PLCL blends as a homogeneous mixture, supporting that such blends were developed. The Results and Discussion section examines their mechanical and thermal properties, but our copy does not compare their miscibility with PLLA/PCL blends or establish improved miscibility. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Higher humidity accelerates PLCL degradation, thereby reducing its mechanical strength.

    “In addition, humidity also has an effect on the mechanical properties of PLCL, and higher humidity accelerates PLCL degradation, thereby reducing its mechanical strength [62].”

    From Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Methods > Degradation test section describes immersing PLLA and PLLA/PLCL blends in phosphate-buffered saline, while Results and Discussion > PLLA/PLCL blends links lower tensile strength to adding PLCL. Neither section addresses humidity or shows that higher humidity accelerates PLCL degradation and thereby reduces its mechanical strength. Searches for humidity, moisture, and wet conditions found no passage establishing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Seidel A Processing and finishing of polymeric materials Vol. 2 2011 New Jersey, NJ Wiley

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, E. Y., Lih, E., Kim, I. H., Joung, Y. K., & Han, D. K.
Affiliations
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Han, Dong Keun
Venue
Biomaterials Research
Published
2016-03-15
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
7-7
ISSN
  • 1226-4601 (ISSN-L)
  • 2055-7124
OpenAlex
W2302349352
Cited by
38
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Biomaterials Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2014M3C1A3056052, 2014M3A9D3033887)
  • Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (10048019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Keywords
poly(L-lactic acid), magnesium hydroxide, polymer blends, biodegradable polymers, mechanical properties, glass transition temperature, thermal degradation, acidic degradation products, neutralization, molecular weight reduction, biomedical polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review